Prolegomenon

Chapter

Abstract

In the process of enacting draft legislation, significant differences between China’s government departments and jurisprudential circles were noted in several specific issues.

References

  1. Berman HJ (1983) Law and revolution: the formation of the Western legal tradition. Harvard University Press, pp 55–56Google Scholar
  2. Bodenheimer E (2004) Jurisprudence: the philosophy and method of the law (trans: Deng ZL). China University of Political Science and Law Press, pp 413–414Google Scholar
  3. Chen FC (2002) The system of punitive damages in American law. Nat Taiwan Univ Law J 31(5)Google Scholar
  4. Christian Von Bar (2004a) The common European law of torts, vol I, (trans: Zhang XB). The Law Press, p 22Google Scholar
  5. Christian Von Bar (2004b) The common European law of torts, vol II, (trans: Jiao MH) The Law Press, p 22Google Scholar
  6. Clegg R (ed) (1994) State civil justice reform. National Legal Center for the Public InterestGoogle Scholar
  7. Coleman J (2001) Tort law and tort theory: preliminary reflections on method. In: Postema GJ (ed) Philosophy and the law of torts, Cambridge University Press, pp 187–188Google Scholar
  8. Du CM (2000) On freedom in legal category. Stud Law Bus 1Google Scholar
  9. Ellis DD (1982) Fairness and efficiency in the law of punitive damages. S Cal L Rev 55(1):3Google Scholar
  10. Guan LH (2003) The confirmation and compensation for moral damages. The People’s Court Press, pp 57, 275Google Scholar
  11. Hu P (2003) On the system of moral damages compensation. China University of political Science and Law Press, pp 128–131Google Scholar
  12. Huang MR (2001) Method of jurisprudence and modern civil law. China University of Political Science and Law Press, p 462Google Scholar
  13. Larenz K (2005) Methodology of jurisprudence (trans: Chen Ai’e). The Commercial Press, p 279Google Scholar
  14. Liang HX (1995) The hermeneutics of civil law. China University of Political Science and Law Press, p 316Google Scholar
  15. Liang HX (1997) From modern civil law to comtemporary civil law: a review on civil law in the twenty century. In: Review on civil and commercial law, The Law Press, p 250Google Scholar
  16. Luo JZ (trans) (2005) The French civil code. The Law Press, pp 1073 and 1081Google Scholar
  17. Pan TL, Cheng KY (1995) Tort Law. The Tianjin People’s Press, p 24Google Scholar
  18. Schwartz B (1990) The legal history of the United States (trans: Wang J et al.) China University of Political Science and Law Press, pp 65–66Google Scholar
  19. Shi JY (2008) The challenge of modern and contemporary law and its countermeasure. Appl Law 8Google Scholar
  20. Su YQ (2002) Rediscussion on the general tort. In: The autonomy on private law in new century. China University of Legal Science and Law Press, pp 304 and 306Google Scholar
  21. Sun GH (ed) (1994) The textbook on jurisprudence. China Renmin University Press, p 83Google Scholar
  22. Sun GH, Zhu JW (2004) Jurisprudence. China Renmin University Press, pp 61–64Google Scholar
  23. Sun GH et al (eds) (1982) The basic theories of legal science. The Law Press, p 45Google Scholar
  24. Wang LM (2003a) On the system of punitive damages in the US. In: Zhang XB (ed) Review on tort law, The People’s Court PressGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang ZJ (2003b) Monetory compensation for time waste and non-property damages, In: The theories of civil law and case study, China University of Political Science and Law, p 167Google Scholar
  26. Wang LM (2004a) On tort law, vol 1. China Renmin University Press, p 685Google Scholar
  27. Wang LM (2004b) On tort law. China University of Political Science and Law Press, p 85Google Scholar
  28. Xiong XL (2004) “Social public interest” in private law. In: Wang LM et al. (eds.) China Court Press, p 105Google Scholar
  29. Xu CX (2002) The current situation of tort liability law in China: observation and review. Polit Legal Forum 1Google Scholar
  30. Xu AG (2006) The historical discussion on tort liability law. Legal Sci 1Google Scholar
  31. Yang RS (1999) Methodology of jurisprudence. China University of Political Science and Law Press, p 175Google Scholar
  32. Yang LX (2005) Tort liability law. The People’s Court Press, p 40Google Scholar
  33. Zeng SX (2001a) The contemporary general principle of civil law and its future. China University of Political Science and Law Press, p 10Google Scholar
  34. Zeng SX (2001b) The theory of compensation law, China University of Political Science and Law Press, pp 379–380Google Scholar
  35. Zhang B (2005) Weighing interests in modern legislation: from the perspective of methodological individualism, Ph.D. Dissertation, Jilin University, pp 13–15Google Scholar
  36. Zhang XB (2007a) On the component of tort liability. The Law Press, pp 172 and 179Google Scholar
  37. Zhang XB (2007b) The relation between the right to claim the employment injury insurance and the right to claim the general compensation. China Legal Sci 2Google Scholar
  38. Zhou WS (2004) On legal interests. Legal Sci 2Google Scholar
  39. Zhou N (2005) The original theories on Roman law. The Commercial Press, p 842Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Renmin University of China Law School, China Legal Science Journals PressBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations