Skip to main content

Prolegomenon

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Legislation of Tort Liability Law in China
  • 399 Accesses

Abstract

In the process of enacting draft legislation, significant differences between China’s government departments and jurisprudential circles were noted in several specific issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Sun (1994).

  2. 2.

    Zhou (2004).

  3. 3.

    Zeng (2001a).

  4. 4.

    Du (2000).

  5. 5.

    Zhang (2005).

  6. 6.

    Bodenheimer (2004).

  7. 7.

    Larenz (2005).

  8. 8.

    Yang (1999).

  9. 9.

    Liang (1995).

  10. 10.

    Huang (2001).

  11. 11.

    Liang (1995), 321.

  12. 12.

    Xiong (2004).

  13. 13.

    Collected works of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, Volume 1, at 16–17 (People’s Press, 1956).

  14. 14.

    Coleman (2001).

  15. 15.

    Sun and Zhu (2004).

  16. 16.

    Berman (1983).

  17. 17.

    Zhou (2005).

  18. 18.

    Xu (2006).

  19. 19.

    Schwartz (1990).

  20. 20.

    Su (2002).

  21. 21.

    Wang (2004a).

  22. 22.

    Article 3 of the Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court of Some Issues concerning the Application of Law for the Trial of Cases on Compensation for Personal Injury.

  23. 23.

    Article 83 of the Second Draft of Tort Liability Law of the People’s Republic of China.

  24. 24.

    Shi (2008).

  25. 25.

    Christian Von Bar (2004a).

  26. 26.

    Luo (2005).

  27. 27.

    Christian Von Bar (2004a).

  28. 28.

    Zhang (2007a).

  29. 29.

    Article 26–30 of the Second Draft of the Tort Liability Law of People’s Republic of China.

  30. 30.

    Wang (2003a).

  31. 31.

    Clegg (1994).

  32. 32.

    Christian Von Bar (2004a), 743.

  33. 33.

    Chen (2002).

  34. 34.

    Ellis (1982).

  35. 35.

    Chen (2002).

  36. 36.

    Christian Von Bar (2004b).

  37. 37.

    Wang (2003b).

  38. 38.

    See Xu (2002), Pan and Cheng (1995), Yang (2005), Wang (2004b).

  39. 39.

    Liang (1997).

  40. 40.

    Sun et al. (1982).

  41. 41.

    Zhang (2007b).

  42. 42.

    Wang (2003b), 306.

  43. 43.

    Guan (2003).

  44. 44.

    Zeng (2001b).

  45. 45.

    Hu (2003).

References

  • Berman HJ (1983) Law and revolution: the formation of the Western legal tradition. Harvard University Press, pp 55–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodenheimer E (2004) Jurisprudence: the philosophy and method of the law (trans: Deng ZL). China University of Political Science and Law Press, pp 413–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen FC (2002) The system of punitive damages in American law. Nat Taiwan Univ Law J 31(5)

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian Von Bar (2004a) The common European law of torts, vol I, (trans: Zhang XB). The Law Press, p 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian Von Bar (2004b) The common European law of torts, vol II, (trans: Jiao MH) The Law Press, p 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg R (ed) (1994) State civil justice reform. National Legal Center for the Public Interest

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman J (2001) Tort law and tort theory: preliminary reflections on method. In: Postema GJ (ed) Philosophy and the law of torts, Cambridge University Press, pp 187–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Du CM (2000) On freedom in legal category. Stud Law Bus 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis DD (1982) Fairness and efficiency in the law of punitive damages. S Cal L Rev 55(1):3

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan LH (2003) The confirmation and compensation for moral damages. The People’s Court Press, pp 57, 275

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu P (2003) On the system of moral damages compensation. China University of political Science and Law Press, pp 128–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang MR (2001) Method of jurisprudence and modern civil law. China University of Political Science and Law Press, p 462

    Google Scholar 

  • Larenz K (2005) Methodology of jurisprudence (trans: Chen Ai’e). The Commercial Press, p 279

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang HX (1995) The hermeneutics of civil law. China University of Political Science and Law Press, p 316

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang HX (1997) From modern civil law to comtemporary civil law: a review on civil law in the twenty century. In: Review on civil and commercial law, The Law Press, p 250

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo JZ (trans) (2005) The French civil code. The Law Press, pp 1073 and 1081

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan TL, Cheng KY (1995) Tort Law. The Tianjin People’s Press, p 24

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz B (1990) The legal history of the United States (trans: Wang J et al.) China University of Political Science and Law Press, pp 65–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi JY (2008) The challenge of modern and contemporary law and its countermeasure. Appl Law 8

    Google Scholar 

  • Su YQ (2002) Rediscussion on the general tort. In: The autonomy on private law in new century. China University of Legal Science and Law Press, pp 304 and 306

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun GH (ed) (1994) The textbook on jurisprudence. China Renmin University Press, p 83

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun GH, Zhu JW (2004) Jurisprudence. China Renmin University Press, pp 61–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun GH et al (eds) (1982) The basic theories of legal science. The Law Press, p 45

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang LM (2003a) On the system of punitive damages in the US. In: Zhang XB (ed) Review on tort law, The People’s Court Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZJ (2003b) Monetory compensation for time waste and non-property damages, In: The theories of civil law and case study, China University of Political Science and Law, p 167

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang LM (2004a) On tort law, vol 1. China Renmin University Press, p 685

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang LM (2004b) On tort law. China University of Political Science and Law Press, p 85

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong XL (2004) “Social public interest” in private law. In: Wang LM et al. (eds.) China Court Press, p 105

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu CX (2002) The current situation of tort liability law in China: observation and review. Polit Legal Forum 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu AG (2006) The historical discussion on tort liability law. Legal Sci 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang RS (1999) Methodology of jurisprudence. China University of Political Science and Law Press, p 175

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang LX (2005) Tort liability law. The People’s Court Press, p 40

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng SX (2001a) The contemporary general principle of civil law and its future. China University of Political Science and Law Press, p 10

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng SX (2001b) The theory of compensation law, China University of Political Science and Law Press, pp 379–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B (2005) Weighing interests in modern legislation: from the perspective of methodological individualism, Ph.D. Dissertation, Jilin University, pp 13–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XB (2007a) On the component of tort liability. The Law Press, pp 172 and 179

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang XB (2007b) The relation between the right to claim the employment injury insurance and the right to claim the general compensation. China Legal Sci 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou WS (2004) On legal interests. Legal Sci 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou N (2005) The original theories on Roman law. The Commercial Press, p 842

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinbao Zhang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zhang, X. (2018). Prolegomenon. In: Legislation of Tort Liability Law in China. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6961-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6961-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6960-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6961-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics