Environment, Health, and New Technologies

Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Economics book series (BRIEFSECONOMICS)

Abstract

This chapter presents a comprehensive review of the literature covering various facets of environmental regulations. The multidimensional association of environmental regulation with economic growth, innovation, and industrial competitiveness are laid down. The cost of regulation is considered as a major reason for the decline in industrial production. This is not only due to the institutional cost of regulation but also because of the cost imposed on firms as a result of restricted resource use. The results of studies investigating the Porter hypothesis are balanced almost equally on both sides of the inconclusive induced innovation debate. The innovation economics literature still has not gained ground in studying innovation activity, particularly environmental innovation, in developing countries. Lack of reliable, comprehensive, and accessible macroeconomic and innovation related studies was certainly one of the reasons few years ago. With the emergence of India, China, and Brazil as new economic powerhouses, new variants of policymaking, governance, and regulatory intervention are surfacing. This section attempts to bring focus on the neglected but critical issue of environmental regulation and innovation in economies, which are currently in a phase of economic, social, and technological transition.

References

  1. Babool, B., & Reed, M. (2010). The impact of environmental policy on international competitiveness in manufacturing. Applied Economics, 42, 2317–2326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrett, S. (1994) Strategic environmental policy and intrenational trade. Journal of Public Economics, 54 (3), 325–338.Google Scholar
  3. Bhatnagar, S., & Cohen, M. A. (1997). The Impact of Environmental Regulation on Innovation: A Panel Data Study, Vanderbilt University (Tennessee) Working Paper.Google Scholar
  4. Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2004). Trade, Growth, and the Environment, Journal of Economic Literature, XLII, 771.Google Scholar
  5. Dean, J., Lovely, M., & Wang, H. (2009). Are Foreign Investors Attracted to Weak Environmental Regulations? Evaluating the Evidence from China, Journal of Development Economics, 90, 1–13.Google Scholar
  6. Feichtinger, G., Hartl, R.F., Kort, P.M., & Veliov, V.M. (2005). Environmental Policy, the Porter Hypothesis and the Composition of Capital: Effects of Learning and Technological Progress, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 50(2), 434–446.Google Scholar
  7. Gabel, H. L., & Sinclair-Desgagne, B. (1998). The firm, its routines, and the environment. In H. Folmer & T. Tietenberg (Eds.), The international yearbook of environmental and resource economics 1998/1999: A survey of current issues. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  8. Greenstone, M., & Syverson, C. (2012). The effects of environmental regulation on the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing. Department of Economics working paper, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  9. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1993). Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement, in Peter M. Garber, ed., The U.S.Mexico free trade agreement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1356.Google Scholar
  10. Jaffe, A.B., & Palmer, K. (1997). Environmental Regulation and Innovation: A Panel Data Study. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(4), 610–6.Google Scholar
  11. Jaffe, A. B., Peterson, S. R., Portney, P. R., & Stavins, R. N. (1995). Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What does the evidence tell us? Journal of Economic Literature, 33(1), 132–163.Google Scholar
  12. Jorgenson, D. W., & Wilcoxen, P. J. (1990). Environmental Regulation and U.S. Economic Growth The Rand Journal of Economics, 21(2), 314–340.Google Scholar
  13. Kalt, J. (1988). The political economy of protectionism: Tariffs and retaliation in the timber industry, in R. Baldwin, ed., Trade policy issues and empirical analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 339–364.Google Scholar
  14. Lanjouw, J.O., & Mody, A. (1996). Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology, Research Policy, 25(4), 549–571.Google Scholar
  15. Larson, B., Nicolaide, E., Zu’b, B.A., Sukka, N., Larak, K., Matouss, M.S., Zaim, K., & Chouchani, C. (2002). The Impact of Environmental Regulations on Exports: Case Study Results from Cyprus, Jordan, Morocco, Syria, Tunisia, and Turkey, World Development, 30(6), 1057–1072.Google Scholar
  16. Leibenstein, H. (1966). Allocative efficiency vs. X-efficiency. American Economic Review, 56, 392–415.Google Scholar
  17. Lyon, T.P. (1995). Regulatory hindsight review and innovation by electric utilities. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 7(3), 233–254.Google Scholar
  18. Pickman, H. (1998). The effect of environmental regulation on environmental innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 7 (4), 223–233.Google Scholar
  19. Porter, M. E. (1991). Americas green strategy. Scientific American, 264(4), 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ratnayake, R. (1998). Do stringent environmental regulations reduce international competitiveness? Evidence from an inter-industry analysis. International Journal of Economics of Business, 5(1), 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rauscher, M. (1994). On Ecological Dumping. Oxford Economic Papers, 46, 822–840.Google Scholar
  23. Stewart, Richard B. (1993). Environmental regulation and international competitiveness. Yale Law Journal, 102(8), 2039–2106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tobey, J. A. (1990). The effects of domestic environmental policies on patterns of world trade: An empirical test. Kyklos, 2, 191–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. UNEP. (2012). The Emissions Gap Report 2012, United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi.Google Scholar
  26. Ulph, A. (1996). Environmental Policy and International Trade when Governments and Producers Act Strategically. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30(3), 265–281.Google Scholar
  27. Xu, X. (2002). International Trade and Environmental Regulation: Time Series Evidence and Cross Section Test. Environmental and Resource Economics, 17, 233–257.Google Scholar
  28. Xepapadeas, A. & Zeeuw,  D. A. (1999). Environmental Policy and Competitiveness: The Porter Hypothesis and the Composition of Capital. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 37, 165–182.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jindal Global Law SchoolO.P. Jindal Global UniversitySonipatIndia

Personalised recommendations