Advertisement

Intelligent Twitter Spam Detection: A Hybrid Approach

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 18)

Abstract

Over the years there has been a large upheaval in the social networking arena. Twitter being one of the most widely-used social networks in the world has always been a key target for intruders. Privacy concerns, stealing of important information and leakage of key credentials to spammers has been on the rise. In this paper, we have developed an Intelligent Twitter Spam Detection System which gives the precise details about spam profiles by identifying and detecting twitter spam. The system is a Hybrid approach as opposed to single-tier, single-classifier approaches which takes into account some unique feature sets before analyzing the tweets and also checks the links with Google Safe Browsing API for added security. This in turn leads to better tweet classification and improved as well as intelligent twitter spam detection.

Keywords

Twitter Spam Machine learning Google safe browsing Hybrid classifiers 

References

  1. 1.
    Stringhini, G., Kruegel, C., Vigna, G.: Detecting spammers on social networks. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, pp. 1–9. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sala, A., Cao, L., Wilson, C., Zablit, R., Zheng, H., Zhao, B.: Measurement-calibrated graph models for social network experiments. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW’10), pp. 861–870. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ahmed, F., Muhammad, A.: An MCL-based approach for spam profile detection in online social networks. In: 2012 IEEE 11th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications, pp. 1–7Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Halim, Z., Gul, M., ul Hassan, N., Baig, R., Rehman, S., Naz, F.: Malicious users’ circle detection in social network based on spatio-temporal co-occurrence. In: 2011 International Conference on Computer Networks and Information Technology (ICCNIT), pp. 35–39, July 2011Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Perez, C., Lemercier, M., Birregah, B., Corpel, A.: SPOT 1.0: scoring suspicious profiles on Twitter. In: 2011 International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), pp. 377–381. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tian, X., Guang, Y., Peng-yu, L.: Spammer detection on Sina micro-blog. In: 2014 (21st) International Conference on Management Science and Engineering, pp. 1–6, 17–19 August 2014Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Qunyan, Z., et al.: Duplicate detection for identifying social spam in microblogs. In: 2013 IEEE International Congress on Big Data (BigData Congress) (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Amleshwaram, A.A., et al.: CATS: characterizing automation of Twitter spammers. In: 2013 Fifth International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks, New York. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen, C., et al.: Battling the internet water army: detection of hidden paid posters. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Joshi, S., et al.: Detection of spam tweets by using machine learning. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. Softw. Eng. 7(4). ISSN: 2277 128XGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information TechnologyMIT College of EngineeringPuneIndia
  2. 2.Department of Computer EngineeringMAEER’s MITPuneIndia
  3. 3.MIT School of Telecom & Management StudiesPuneIndia

Personalised recommendations