Abstract
The evaluation results of China Judicial Transparency Index for 2015 show that judicial openness in China is rapidly improving as pushed by the Supreme People’s Court (SPC). Although some courts are latecomers to the development of judicial administration, they have enforced higher level of transparency in information disclosure. Some courts have made a breakthrough in information disclosure of the judgment documents that ought not to be published online. Some have been paying great attention to the disclosure of judicial statistics and have partially made publicly available the information about judicial reform. Nevertheless, several issues around judicial openness are also found, such that similar disclosure platforms are being developed redundantly, the accuracy of information disclosure is low, payment for the disclosure of judicial information is required, data disclosure is still at a preliminary stage, and the transparency in judicial reform requires further improvement. Judicial openness must be promoted by accommodating to big data application requirements and adopting the top-down design with a public-oriented mindset. The courts are required to construct intensive disclosure platforms, progressively develop work mechanisms for information disclosure upon application, abandon the idea of seeking profit from the disclosure of public information, introduce the relief mechanism for judicial openness and build a judicial big data.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Head of the Project Team: He Tian, Professor of the Institute of Law of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. Team members: Yanbin Lv, Wang Xiaomei, Li Yanjie, Xu Bin, Liu Yanpeng, Zhao Qianling, Ma Xiaofang, Wang Xu, Liu Di, Yang Qin, Cao Yanan, Zhang Duo, Zhao Fan, Zhou Zhen, Ning Yan, Xu Lei, Liu Yongli, Zhang Yu, Song Junjie. This report was written by Wang Xiaomei, who is an Associate Professor of the Institute of Law of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. Also special thanks to a number of scholars, judges and attorneys for their support and assistance with the development and optimization of evaluation indicators, researches and drafting of this report.
- 2.
At the end of 2013, Guangzhou Intermediate People’s Court had 641 employees on the staffing quota list, including 577 employed by government departments and 64 by government affiliated institutions. The actual number of employees was 857 at the year end, including 607 in-service staff, 22 retired senior executives and 228 retirees. The 857 people were paid out of the fiscal and budgetary appropriations (subsidies), including 607 in-service staff (544 working in administrative, procuratorial or judicial organs and 63 in the institutions affiliated to these organs), 22 retired senior executives and 228 retirees. In addition, there were 186 people who were not included in the staffing quota list, such as contractors or people employed on a long-term basis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. and Social Sciences Academic Press
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Li, L., Tian, H., Lv, Y. (2018). China Judicial Transparency Index Report (2015). In: Li, L., Tian, H., Lv, Y. (eds) China’s Rule of Law Index 2017. Research Series on the Chinese Dream and China’s Development Path. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6907-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6907-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6906-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6907-9
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)