Advertisement

Contemporary Urban Indigenous Placemaking in Canada

  • Sarem Nejad
  • Ryan Walker
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter examines contemporary trends in Indigenous placemaking in Canada, discussing cases from the cities of Ottawa, Calgary, Saskatoon, and Winnipeg. In these cities Indigenous cultures are being infused into the design and programming of public spaces, although shortcomings exist. Key concepts from the academic literature on place, placemaking, and urban design are discussed, setting up a point of departure for our analysis of Canadian cities. The chapter concludes by highlighting some important principles for Indigenous-inclusive placemaking in Canadian cities that would increase the visibility of Indigenous cultures in the built environment.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work discussed in this chapter was funded by an Insight Grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, held by the second author. We are grateful to two anonymous referees and the editors for their constructive feedback on the chapter. Finally, we thank all of the people who shared their knowledge and ideas with us about projects from Ottawa, Winnipeg, Saskatoon and Calgary.

References

  1. Alderman, D. (2000). A street fit for a king: Naming places and commemoration in the American South. Professional Geographer, 52, 672–684.Google Scholar
  2. Alderman, D. (2003). Street names and the scaling of memory: The politics of commemorating Martin Luther King, Jr within the African American community. Area, 35, 163–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alfred, T. (2009). Colonialism and state dependency. Journal of Aboriginal Health, 5, 42–60.Google Scholar
  4. Algonquins of Ontario Negotiation Team. (2016). Algonquins of Ontario: Renewed Hope—A Journey of Survival, Rebuilding and Self-sufficiency. 3.Google Scholar
  5. Andersen, C. (2009). Critical Indigenous studies: From difference to density. Cultural Studies Review, 15(2), 80–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Artibise, A. (1975). Winnipeg: A social history of urban growth, 1874–1914. Montreal-Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Artibise, A. (1977). Winnipeg: An illustrated history. Toronto: J. Lorimer in Association with the National Museum of Man.Google Scholar
  8. Augé, M. (1995). Non-places: Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  9. Azaryahu, M. (1996). The power of commemorative street names. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 14, 311–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Banivanua Mar, T., & Edmonds, P. (2010). Making settler colonial space: Perspectives on race, place and identity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Behrendt, L. (2009). Home: The importance of place to the dispossessed. South Atlantic Quarterly, 108(1), 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Westport: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  14. Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian meditations. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  16. Burley, D. (2013). Rooster Town: Winnipeg’s lost Métis suburb, 1900–1960. Urban History Review, 42(1), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chakasim, K. J., (2017). Original teachings: “Grandfathered into” an architecture of reconciliation. Presentation at Architecture Canada’s International Indigenous Architecture and Design Symposium: Reconciliation, Place-Making, and Identity. Ottawa, 27 May.Google Scholar
  18. City of Winnipeg. (2011). Aboriginal persons highlights. Winnipeg: City of Winnipeg.Google Scholar
  19. Cooper, S. (2009). The meeting place: Examining the relationship between colonialism and planning at The Forks, Winnipeg. (Master’s thesis, University of Manitoba).Google Scholar
  20. Cresswell, T. (2004). Place: A short introduction. Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  21. Crowshoe, L. (2015). Paskapoo slopes: Accommodating blackfoot cultural heritage. Heritage, XVIII(3), 16–19.Google Scholar
  22. Dafoe, C. (1998). Winnipeg, heart of the continent. Winnipeg: Great Plains Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Dovey, K. (1999). Framing places: Mediating power in built form. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dovey, K. (2010). Becoming places: Urbanism/architecture/identity/power. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Ens, G. (1996). Homeland to hinterland: The changing worlds of the Red river Métis in the nineteenth Century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  26. Environics. (2010). Urban Aboriginal peoples study-main report. Toronto: Environics Institute.Google Scholar
  27. Environics. (2011). Urban Aboriginal peoples study: Winnipeg report. Toronto: Environics Institute.Google Scholar
  28. FitzMaurice, K., McCaskill, D., & Cidro, J. (2012). Urban aboriginal people in Toronto: A summary of the 2011 Toronto aboriginal research project (TARP). In D. Newhouse, K. FitzMaurice, T. McGuire-Adams, & D. Jette (Eds.), Well-being in the urban aboriginal community: Fostering biimaadiziwin, a national research conference on urban aboriginal peoples. Toronto: Thompson Educational Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. Glenn, D. (2017). Contribution to Plenary Discussion at Architecture Canada’s International Indigenous Architecture and Design Symposium: Reconciliation, Place-Making, and Identity. Ottawa, 27 May.Google Scholar
  30. Goheen, P. (1998). Public space and the geography of the modern city. Progress in Human Geography, 22(4), 479–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grenfell, M. (2008). Pierre Bourdieu: Key concepts. Stockfield: Acumen.Google Scholar
  32. Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. New Left Review, 53, 23–40.Google Scholar
  33. Hillier, B. (2007). Non-discursive regularities. In B. Hillier (Ed.), Space is the machine; a configurational theory of architecture. London: Space syntax.Google Scholar
  34. HTFC Planning and Design. (1993). Oodena Celebration Circle Interpretive Design. www.htfc.mb.ca/projects/oodena-celebration-circle/. Accessed 25 November 2016.
  35. Huck, B., & Flynn, C. (2003). A continental crossroads. In B. Huck (Ed.), Crossroads of the continent: A history of the forks of the red and Assiniboine rivers (pp. 46–65). Winnipeg: Heartland Associates Inc. and Forks North Portage Partnership.Google Scholar
  36. Jacobs, J. (1996). Edge of empire; Postcolonialism and the city. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  38. Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on cities. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  39. Legg, S. (2007). Reviewing geographies of memory/forgetting. Environment and Planning A, 39, 456–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lynch, N., & Ley, D. (2010). The changing meanings of urban places. In T. Bunting, P. Filion, & R. Walker (Eds.), Canadian cities in transition: New directions in the twenty-first century (4th ed.). Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Madanipour, A. (2003). Public and private spaces of the city. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Madanipour, A. (2005). Public spaces of European cities. Nordic Journal of Architectural Research, 1, 7–16.Google Scholar
  43. Madanipour, A. (2006). Roles and challenges of urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 11(2), 173–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Malone, G. (2007). Ways of belonging: Reconciliation and Adelaide’s public space Indigenous cultural markers. Geographical Research, 45(2), 158–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Massey, D. (1994). Space, place, and gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  46. Matunga, H. (2013). Theorizing indigenous planning. In R. Walker, T. Jojola, & D. Natcher (Eds.), Reclaiming indigenous planning (pp. 3–32). Montreal-Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  47. McGaw, J., Pieris, A., & Potter, E. (2011). Indigenous place-making in the city: Dispossessions, occupations and implications for cultural architecture. Architectural Theory Review, 16(3), 296–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mitchell, D. (2003). The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. New York & London: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  49. Newhouse, D. (2011). Urban life: Reflections of a middle-class Indian. In H. Howard & C. Proulx (Eds.), Aboriginal peoples in Canadian cities: Transformations and continuities (pp. 23–38). Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Norberg-Schulz, C. (1980). Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture. New York: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
  51. Office of the Treaty Commissioner. (2016). Saskatoon public library names new branch to honour Métis, 27 November. www.otc.ca/blog/blog_details/saskatoon_public_library_names_new_branch_to_honour_mtis.html?page=1. Accessed 2 April 2017.
  52. Ottawa Sun. (2013). No Common Sense in Changing LeBreton Station to Pimisi: Editorial, 20 August. www.ottawasun.com/2013/08/20/no-common-sense-in-changing-lebreton-station-to-pimisi. Accessed 2 April 2017.
  53. Parks Canada. (2009). The Forks National Historic Site of Canada. www.pc.gc.ca/eng/lhn-nhs/mb/forks/natcul/histo.aspx. Accessed 31 March 2017.
  54. Peters, E. (2005). Indigeneity and marginalisation: Planning for and with urban Aboriginal communities in Canada. Progress in Planning, 63, 327–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Peters, E. (2015). Aboriginal people in Canadian cities. In P. Filion, M. Moos, T. Vinodrai, & R. Walker (Eds.), Canadian cities in transition: Perspectives for an urban age (5th ed., pp. 364–378). Don Mills: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Porter, L. (2010). Unlearning the colonial cultures of planning. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  57. Porter, L. (2013). Coexistence in cities: The challenge of indigenous urban planning in the twenty-first century. In R. Walker, T. Jojola, & D. Natcher (Eds.), Reclaiming indigenous planning (pp. 283–310). Montreal-Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. London: Pion.Google Scholar
  59. Rose-Redwood, R. (2008). From number to name: Symbolic capital, places of memory and the politics of street renaming in New York City. Social and Cultural Geography, 9(4), 431–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sandercock, L. (2003). Cosmopolis II; Mongrel cities: Cities in the 21st century. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  61. Schilling, R. (1983). Gabriel’s children. Local 11, Saskatoon: Saskatoon Métis Society.Google Scholar
  62. Shaw-Collinge, T. (2017). Urban engagements with Indigenous people. Presentation at Architecture Canada’s International Indigenous Architecture and Design Symposium: Reconciliation, Place-Making, and Identity. Ottawa, 27 May.Google Scholar
  63. Shaw, W. (2007). Cities of whiteness. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shoval, N., & Strom, E. (2009). Inscribing universal values into the urban landscape: New York, Jerusalem, and Winnipeg as case studies. Urban Geography, 30(2), 143–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Silver, J. (2006). In their own voices: Building urban aboriginal communities. Halifax: Farnwood Publishing.Google Scholar
  66. Simpson, L. (2011). Dancing on our turtle’s back: Stories of Nishnaabeg re-creation, resurgence and a new emergence. Winnipeg: ARP Books.Google Scholar
  67. St. John, P. (2003). The Forks today. In B. Huck (Ed.), Crossroads of the continent: A history of the Forks of the Red and Assiniboine Rivers (pp. 146–175). Winnipeg: Heartland Associates Inc. and Forks North Portage Partnership.Google Scholar
  68. Stanger-Ross, J. (2008). Municipal colonialism in Vancouver: City planning and the conflict over Indian Reserves, 1928–1950s. The Canadian Historical Review, 89(4), 541–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stewart, P. (2015). Indigenous architecture through indigenous knowledge. (Ph.D. thesis), University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  70. The Forks. (1993). Oodena Celebration Circle. http://www.theforks.com/uploads/ck/files/AboutOodena.pdf. Accessed 11 November 2016.
  71. The Forks North Portage Partnership. (2009). Building connections 2010–2020. Winnipeg: The Fork North Portage Partnership.Google Scholar
  72. Tomiak, J. (2016). Unsettling Ottawa: Settler colonialism, indigenous resistance, and the politics of scale. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 25(1), 8–21.Google Scholar
  73. Troupe, C. (2009). Métis women: Social structure, urbanization and political activism, 1850–1980. (MA thesis, University of Saskatchewan).Google Scholar
  74. Tuan, Y.-F. (1974). Topophilia: A study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc.Google Scholar
  75. Tuan, Y.-F. (1977). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis & London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  76. Walker, R. (2013). Increasing the depth of our civic identity: Future seeking and place making with Aboriginal communities. In E. Peters & C. Andersen (Eds.), Indigenous in the city: Contemporary identities and cultural innovation (pp. 151–165). Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  77. Walker, R., Berdahl, L., Lashta, E., Newhouse, D., & Belanger, Y. (2017). Public attitudes towards indigeneity in Canadian prairie urbanism. The Canadian Geographer, 61(2), 212–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wall, K. (2012). The gallery and the Inukshuk: Everyday creativity and cultural production as leisure practices. Leisure/Loisir, 36(1), 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wansborough, M., & Mageean, A. (2000). The role of urban design in cultural regeneration. Journal of Urban Design, 5(2), 181–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wilson, K., & Peters, E. (2005). You can make a place for it: Remapping urban first nations spaces of identity. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23, 395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of SaskatchewanSaskatoonCanada

Personalised recommendations