Advertisement

Contemporary Change in Sāmoan Indigenous Village Architecture: Sociocultural Dynamics and Implications

  • Micah Van der Ryn
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter highlights the integral role that Indigenous Sāmoan architecture plays within Sāmoan culture and the dynamics and implications of change. From high dome shaped thatch roofs to lower sloped, straight corrugated iron roofs, from open sides to partial or total walls, from round ends to square ends, the author examines the material, economic, and sociocultural factors of how and why these changes through a half century of globalization in the Sāmoan Islands. Sāmoans interpretations and ethnographic observations of the impacts these changes, as well as structural and phenomenological forms of analysis inform the exegesis, which overall aim to strengthen the view of how architecture both reflects and shapes sociocultural processes.

Notes

Acknowledgement

This chapter was written with support from The Wenner-Gren Foundation Hunt Postdoctoral Fellowship. [Grant #9320. Approved 10/4/2016].

References

  1. Allen, A. (1993). Space as social construct: The vernacular architecture of rural Samoa. Ph.D. thesis, Colombia University.Google Scholar
  2. Barnes, S., & Green, R. (2008). From Tongan meeting house to Samoan chapel. The Journal of Pacific History, 43(1), 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blach, M. (1995). The resurrection of the house amongst the Zafimaniry. In J. Hugh-Jones (Ed.), About the house (pp. 69–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1985). The genesis of the concepts of habitus and field. Sociocriticism, 2(2), 11–24.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (2002). Habitus. In J. Hillier & E. Rooksby (Eds.), Habitus: A sense of place: Urban and regional planning and development (pp. 27–34). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  6. Buchli, V. (2002). The material culture reader. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  7. Buchli, V. (2006). Architecture and Modernism. In Handbook of material culture (pp. 255–266).Google Scholar
  8. Buck, P. (Te Rangi Hiroa). (1930). Samoan material culture. Honolulu: Bishop Museum.Google Scholar
  9. Carsten, J., & Hugh-Jones, S. (1995). About the house: Lévi-Strauss and beyond. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Female interviewee, American Samoa. (2005). Interview with Micah Van der Ryn.Google Scholar
  11. Fox, J. (1993). Inside Austronesian houses: Perspectives on domestic designs for living. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
  12. Gell, A. (1998). Art and agency: An anthropological theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  13. Green, R. (2002). A retrospective view of settlement pattern studies in Samoa. In R. Green, T. Ladefoged, & M. Graves (Eds.), Pacific landscapes archaeological approaches (pp. 125–152). Los Osos: Bearsville Press.Google Scholar
  14. Handy, E., Craighill, S., & Handy, W. (1924). Samoan house building, cooking and tattooing. Bulletin No. 5. Honolulu: Bishop Museum.Google Scholar
  15. Howell, S. (1995). The Lio house: Building, category, idea, value. In J. Carsten & S. Hugh-Jones (Eds.), About the house: Lévi-Strauss and Beyond (pp. 149–169). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge & New York.Google Scholar
  16. Janowski, M. (1995). The hearth-group, the conjugal couple and the symbolism of the rice meal among the Kelabit of Sarawak. In J. Caststen & S. Hugh-Jones (Eds.), About the house: Levi-Strauss and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Joyce, R., & Gillespie, S. (2000). Beyond kinship: Social and material reproduction in house societies. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ka’ili, T. (2008). Tauhi Va: Creating beauty through the art of sociospatial relations. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Washington.Google Scholar
  19. Keen, T. (1979). Houses without walls: Samoan social control. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Hawai’i.Google Scholar
  20. Knappett, C. (2005). Thinking through material culture: An interdisciplinary perspective, archaeology, culture, and society. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  21. Krämer, A. (1994). The Samoan Islands: An outline of a monograph giving special consideration to German Samoa. Auckland: Polynesian Press.Google Scholar
  22. La Pérouse, J. (1799). A voyage round the world performed in 1785, 1786, 1787 and 1788 by Boussole & Astolebe (Vols. 1 & 2). London: Hamilton (Reprinted 1968).Google Scholar
  23. Lehman, F., & Herdrich, D. (2002). On the relevance of point field spatiality in Oceania. In G. Bennardo (Ed.), Representing space in Oceania: Culture in language and mind (pp. 179–197). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
  24. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1991). Maison. In P. Bonte. & M. Izard (Eds.), Dictionnaire de L‘ethnologie et de L‘anthropologie (pp. 129–131). Paris: Universitaire de France Presses.Google Scholar
  25. Lilomaiava-Doktor, S. (2009). Beyond migration: Samoan population movement (malaga) and the geography of social space (Vā). The Contemporary Pacific, 21(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Māhina, T. (2002). Tufunga Lalava: The Tongan art of lineal and spatial intersection. In S. Rees (Ed.), Filipe Tohi, genealogy of lines: Hohoko ē tohitohi (pp. 5–9). New Plymouth: Govett-Brewster Art Gallery.Google Scholar
  27. Māhina, T. (2008). From vale (ignorance) to ‘ILO (knowledge) to poto (skill), the Tongan theory of ako (education): Theorising old problems anew. Alternative: An International Journal of Indigenous Scholarship, 4(1), 67–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Man in Faga’itua Village. (2004). Interview with Micah Van der Ryn.Google Scholar
  29. Mauss, M. (1934). Les Techniques du Corps. Journal de Psychologie, 32(3/4), 434–450.Google Scholar
  30. Meleisea, M. (1987). The making of modern Samoa: Traditional authority and colonial administration in the history of Western Samoa. Suva: Institute of Pacific Studies.Google Scholar
  31. Miller, D. (1998). Material cultures: Why some things matter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Miller, D. (2005). Materiality. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moyle, R. (1984). The Samoan journals of John Williams. Canberra: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Neich, R. (1985). Western Samoa material culture: Persistence and change (Vol. 23). National Museum of New Zealand Bulletin.Google Scholar
  35. Oliver, D. (2002). Polynesia in early historic times. Honolulu: Bess Press.Google Scholar
  36. Palmer, T. (2005). Interview with Micah Van der Ryn.Google Scholar
  37. Potauaine, S. (2009). Tatau: Symmetry as conflict-mediation of line-space intersection. In Proceedings of the traction of drawing: 2009 Interstices under Construction Symposium. Auckland: University of Auckland.Google Scholar
  38. Rapoport, A. (1990). The meaning of the built environment: A nonverbal communication approach. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  39. Rapoport, A. (1994). Thirty three papers in environment-behaviour research. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Urban International Press.Google Scholar
  40. Rapoport, A. (2001). Architectural anthropology or environment-behaviour studies? In M. Amerlinck (Ed.), Architectural anthropology (pp. 27–41). Westport, Connecticut & London: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
  41. Refiti, A. L. (2002). Uneven boundaries that do not flatten easily. In J. MacArthur & A. Moulis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Additions to Architectural History: XIXth Annual Conference of the Society of Architectural Historians Australia and New Zealand. Brisbane: SAHANZ.Google Scholar
  42. Refiti, A. L. (2004). The vā body in Pacific thinking. Journal of the Manukau School of Visual Arts, 1, 48–52.Google Scholar
  43. Schultz, E. (1980). Samoan proverbial expressions: Alaga’upu fa’a-Samoa. Auckland: Polynesian Press.Google Scholar
  44. Shore, B. (1982). Sala’ilua: A Samoan mystery. New York: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Soa, A. (2004). Interview with Micah Van der Ryn.Google Scholar
  46. Sutter, F. K. (1971). Samoa: A photographic essay. University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  47. Sutter, F. K. (1984). Amerika Sāmoa: An anthropological photo essay. University of Hawaii Press. Google Scholar
  48. Tilley, C., Keane, W., Kuchler-Gogden, S., & Rowlaids, M. (2005). Handbook of material culture. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  49. Tui Atua, T. (2009). In search of harmony: Peace in the Samoan Indigenous religion. In S. Tamasa’ilau, T. I’uogafa, N. Tofilau, & N. Fuamatu (Eds.), Su’esu’e Manogi: In search of fragrance (pp. 104–114). Apia: National University of Samoa.Google Scholar
  50. Turner, G. (1884). Samoa: A hundred years ago and Long Ago. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  51. UNESCO Office for the Pacific States. (1992). The Samoan Fale. Apia: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  52. Van der Ryn, M. (2008). The measina of architecture in Samoa: An examination of vā in Samoan architecture and sociocultural implications of architectural changes. In Measina a Samoa III. Apia: South Pacific Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  53. Van der Ryn, M. (2012). The difference walls make: Cultural dynamics and implications of change in Samoan architectural traditions and socio-spatial practices (1940–2006). Ph.D. thesis, The University of Auckland.Google Scholar
  54. Van der Ryn, M. (2016). Which way is front?: Spatial orientation complications in contemporary samoan villages. Structure and Dynamics: eJournal of Anthropological and Related Sciences, 9(1).Google Scholar
  55. Vellinga, M. (2007). Anthropology and materiality of architecture. American Ethnologist, 34, 756–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.American Samoa Community CollegeMapusagaUSA

Personalised recommendations