The Postcolonial Paradox and Feminist Solidarity

Chapter

Abstract

Postcolonial feminists critique the universalization of women globally, for applying Western standards of emancipation on all women and describing non-western, women of colour as the “other”. However, this postcolonial dilemma resulted in a postcolonial anxiety that resorted to pluralism and fragmented women into smaller identity groups. This chapter examines the postcolonial paradox and anxiety in the experiences of people involved in transnational movement from the “one-third world” accessing surrogacy in the “two-third world”. This chapter observes this postcolonial paradox among the intended parents who accessed surrogacy in Gujarat, India, through interviews and participant observations. Women in India participate in surrogacy to enhance their economic conditions and as their body parts are comparatively more remunerative than men. A choice between “poverty” or surrogacy cannot be prescribed as “liberty”. Intended parents had escaped the stricter surrogacy regulations in their home country in expectation of procedural ease, lesser rights for surrogate mothers (SMs), and more control over the surrogacy process in India. These motivations of intended parents are inherently exploitative. The experience of intended parents and the surrogacy markets reveal that it is neither the imperial Global North-South nor the re-oriental South-South patterns that can describe the holistic phenomenon of surrogacy in India. Surrogacy practices has also revealed the classist, sexist, racist elements and violation of women’s bodies that is common in both the Global North and Global South and yet some academics and feminists fail to note these bridging factors. There is, hence, a need for global feminists to form an alliance based on a reproductive justice framework that aims to reduce forms of inequalities that transects class, race, gender, sexuality, disability, age, and immigration status in critique of practices that exploit such vulnerability.

Keywords

Postcolonial paradox Re-orientalism Neo-colonialism Otherness Reproductive care chain Cultural relativism 

References

  1. Arlamovsky, Maria. 2016. Future baby. NGF: Nikolaus Geyrhalter Filmproduktion.Google Scholar
  2. Berkowitz, Jonathan M., and Jack W. Snyder. 1998. Racism and sexism in medically assisted conception. Bioethics 12 (1): 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhalla, Nita, and Mansi Thapiyal. 2013. Foreigners are flocking to India to rent wombs and grow surrogate babies. Reuters, Business Insider. http://www.businessinsider.com/india-surrogate-mother-industry-2013-9?IR=T. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  4. CADAC, CLF, CoRP. 2016. Assisi of 2 February 2016 for the universal abolition of surrogacy. Coordination of Associations for the right to abortion and contraception, CLF Coordination Lesbienne en France, CoRP—Collectif pour le Respect de la Personne.Google Scholar
  5. Che, Liberta. 2017. Bando universale, atti del convegno alla Camera. Che Liberta. http://www.cheliberta.it/2017/03/30/atti-incontro-maternita-al-bivio/#.WNzUzXaBf58.facebook. Accessed 14 Aug 2017.
  6. Dahl, E. 2007. The 10 most common objections to sex selection and why they are far from conclusive: A western perspective. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 14: 158–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dhawan, Nikita. 2009. Postkoloniale Theorie. In Raumwissenschaften, ed. S. Günzel, M. Castro Varela, and S. Randeria, 308–323. Frankfurt Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  8. Esteva, G., and S.P. Madhu. 1998. Grassroots post-modernism: Remaking the soil of cultures. London: Zed.Google Scholar
  9. Fernandes, L. 2013. Transnational feminism in the United States: Knowledge, ethics, and power. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fudge, J. 2011. Global care chains, employment agencies, and the conundrum of jurisdiction: Decent work for domestic workers in Canada. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 23: 235–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fulfer, Katy. 2017. Cross-border reproductive travel, neocolonialism, and Canadian Policy. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 10 (1): 225–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grewal, Inderpal, and Caren Kaplan. 1994. Introduction: Transnational feminist practices and questions of postmodernity. In Scattered hegemonies: Postmodernity and transnational feminist practices, ed. Inderpal Grewal and Caren Kaplan, 1–36. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gupta, J.A. 2006. Towards transnational feminisms some reflections and concerns in relation to the globalization of reproductive technologies. European Journal of Women’s Studies 13: 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hochschild, A.R. 2000. The nanny chain. The American Prospect 3: 32–36.Google Scholar
  15. Hochschild, Arlie. 2011. Emotional life on the market frontier. The Annual Review of Sociology 37: 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huggan, Graham. 1997. The neocolonialism of postcolonialism: A cautionary note. Links and Letters 4: 19–24.Google Scholar
  17. Langlois, A. 2009. Normative and theoretical foundations of human rights. In Human rights: Politics and practise, ed. M. Goodhart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Malpani, A. 1998. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of the embryo for preconceptional sex selection: Right or wrong? Obstetrics and Gynaecology Today 3: 486–490.Google Scholar
  19. Mies, M., and V. Shiva. 1993. Ecofeminism. London: Zed.Google Scholar
  20. Mohanty, C.T. 1986. Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Boundary 2 (12): 333–358.Google Scholar
  21. Mohanty, C.T. 2003. “Under western eyes” revisited: Feminist solidarity through anticapitalist struggles. Signs 28: 499–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mohanty, C.T. 2013. Transnational feminist crossings: On neoliberalism and radical critique. Signs 38: 967–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Narayan, U. 1998. Essence of culture and a sense of history: A feminist critique of cultural essentialism. Hypatia 13: 86–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. NDTV. 2015. Women selling bodies to earn livelihood: Minister Anupriya Patel on surrogacy bill. NDTV. http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/women-selling-bodies-to-earn-livelihood-minister-on-surrogacy-bill-1453387. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  25. Ong, Aihwa. 1987. Spirits of resistance and capitalist discipline: Factory women in Malaysia. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  26. Pande, A. 2010. Commercial surrogacy in India: Manufacturing a perfect mother-worker. Signs 35: 969–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Patil, V. 2013. From patriarchy to intersectionality: A transnational feminist assessment of how far we’ve really come. Signs 38 (4): 847–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Perappadan, Bindu Shajan. 2015. A Setback for surrogacy in India. The Hindu. http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/a-setback-for-surrogacy-in-india/article7927730.ece. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  29. Rao, Nagesh. 2000. ‘Neocolonialism’ or ‘globalization’: Postcolonial theory and the demands of political economy. Interdisciplinary Literary Studies 1 (2): 165–184.Google Scholar
  30. Raymond, J.G. 1993. Women as wombs: Reproductive technologies and the battle over women’s freedom. San Francisco: Harper.Google Scholar
  31. Robertson, J.A. 2001. Preconception gender selection. American Journal of Bioethics 1: 2–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rose, N., and C. Novas. 2003. Biological citizenship. In Blackwell companion to global anthropology, ed. A. Ong and S. Collier. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  33. Rothman, B.K. 2000. Recreating motherhood. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Rudrappa, Sharmila. 2012. India’s reproductive assembly line. Contexts 11 (2): 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rudrappa, S., and C. Collins. 2015. Altruistic agencies and compassionate consumers: Moral framing of transnational surrogacy. Gender & Society 29: 937–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Said, Edward. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  37. Saravanan, S. 2016. Liberty for whom: Reproductive justice and surrogacy arrangements in India surrogacy: Situating France within the world—Representations, regulations, and experiences, 17–18 Nov, Paris.Google Scholar
  38. Saravanan, S., and R.R. Ranadive. 2010. Mother anonymous (documentary). India: Frame of Mind Communications Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai and Asia and Europe in a Global Context, University of Heidelberg, Germany.Google Scholar
  39. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1988. Can the Subaltern Speak? In Marxism and the interpretation of culture, ed. Cary Nelson, 271–313. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tong, Rosemarie. 2009. Feminist thought: A more comprehensive introduction. Philadelphia: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  41. Tyagi, R. 2014. Understanding postcolonial feminism in relation with postcolonial and feminist theories. International Journal of Language and Linguistics 1: 45–50.Google Scholar
  42. Walley, C. 1997. Searching for “voices”: Feminism, anthropology, and the global debate over female genital operations. Cultural Anthropology 12: 405–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Whittaker, A., and C. Leng. 2016. Flexible bio-citizenship and international medical travel: Transnational mobilities for care in Asia. International Sociology 31 (3): 286–304.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anthropology, South Asia InstituteHeidelberg UniversityHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations