Bayesian Optimization of Molecules Adsorbed to Metal Surfaces

Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in the Mathematics of Materials book series (BRIEFSMAMA, volume 3)

Abstract

In the previous chapter, we saw how Bayesian optimization is implemented in practice by considering a diatomic molecule. Of course, there is little point in applying Bayesian optimization to such a simple system, as the full potential energy curve can be quickly calculated using simple quantum chemistry. In this chapter, we consider a more complex situation, consisting of organic molecules adsorbed to a metal surface.

References

  1. 1.
    Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett. 1997;78:1396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hamada I. van der Waals density functional made accurate. Phys Rev B. 2014;89:121103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tkatchenko A, Scheffler M. Accurate molecular van der Waals interactions from ground-state electron density and free-atom reference data. Phys Rev Lett. 2009;102:073005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Todorovic M, Gutmann MU, Corander J, Rinke P. arXiv:1708.09274.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Packwood DM, Hitosugi T. Rapid prediction of molecule arrangements on metal surfaces via Bayesian optimization. Appl Phys Express. 2017;10:065502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cai J. Atomically precise bottom-up fabrication of graphene nanoribbons. Nature. 2010;466:470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Han P, et al. Bottom-up graphene-nanoribbon fabrication reveals chiral edges and enantioselectivity. ACS Nano. 2014;8:9181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Han P, et al. Self-assembly strategy for fabricating connected graphene nanoribbons. ACS Nano. 2015;9:12035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ruffieux P, et al. On-surface synthesis of graphene nanoribbons with zigzag edge topology. Nature. 2016;531:489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Packwood DM, Han P, Hitosugi T. Chemical and entropic control on the molecular self-assembly process. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Akima H, Gabhardt A. Akima: interpolation of irregularly and regularly spaced data. R package version 0.5–12. 2015. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=akima.
  12. 12.
    R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2017. https://www.R-project.org/.
  13. 13.
    Rupp M, et al. Fast and accurate modeling of molecular atomization energies with machine learning. Phys Rev Lett. 2012;108:058301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hansen K, et al. Assessment and validation of machine learning methods for predicting molecular atomization energies. J Chem Theory Comput. 2013;9:3404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bagus PS, Germann K, Woll C. The interaction of C6H6 and C6H12 with noble metal surfaces: electronic level alignment and the origin of the interface dipole. J Chem Phys. 2005;123:183109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Witte G, et al. Vacuum level alignment at organic/metal junctions: “Cushion” effect and the interface dipole. Appl Phys Lett. 2015;87:263502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Integrated Cell-Materials Sciences (iCeMS)Kyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations