Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Surveillance Protocol After Endoscopic Resection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Endoscopy in Early Gastrointestinal Cancers, Volume 2

  • 396 Accesses

Abstract

Due to recent progress in endoscopic treatment, a lot of gastrointestinal cancers or premalignant lesions are successfully removed using this technique and patients’ quality of life is considerably improved as a result. However, the risk of secondary cancers after endoscopic resection is likely higher than that after surgery, because metachronous cancer may develop from the preserved organ. Therefore, appropriate surveillance after endoscopic resection is essential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yamashina T, Ishihara R, Nagai K, et al. Long-term outcome and metastatic risk after endoscopic resection of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:544–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Katada C, Yokoyama T, Yano T, et al. Alcohol consumption and multiple dysplastic lesions increase risk of squamous cell carcinoma in the esophagus, head, and neck. Gastroenterology. 2016;151:860–869 e867.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shimizu Y, Tsukagoshi H, Fujita M, et al. Long-term outcome after endoscopic mucosal resection in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma invading the muscularis mucosae or deeper. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:387–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shimizu Y, Tsukagoshi H, Fujita M, et al. Head and neck cancer arising after endoscopic mucosal resection for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Endoscopy. 2003;35:322–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Muto M, Hironaka S, Nakane M, et al. Association of multiple Lugol-voiding lesions with synchronous and metachronous esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients with head and neck cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:517–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hori K, Okada H, Kawahara Y, et al. Lugol-voiding lesions are an important risk factor for a second primary squamous cell carcinoma in patients with esosphageal cancer or head and neck cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:858–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Katada C, Muto M, Tanabe S, et al. Surveillance after endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Dig Endosc. 2013;25(Suppl 1):39–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pech O, Behrens A, May A, et al. Long-term results and risk factor analysis for recurrence after curative endoscopic therapy in 349 patients with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and mucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s oesophagus. Gut. 2008;57:1200–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Larghi A, Lightdale CJ, Ross AS, et al. Long-term follow-up of complete Barrett’s eradication endoscopic mucosal resection (CBE-EMR) for the treatment of high grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma. Endoscopy. 2007;39:1086–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Saligram S, Chennat J, Hu H, et al. Endotherapy for superficial adenocarcinoma of the esophagus: an American experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:872–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakagawa K, Koike T, Iijima K, et al. Comparison of the long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection for superficial squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus in Japan. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:348–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ono H, Yao K, Fujishiro M, et al. Guidelines for endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer. Dig Endosc. 2016;28:3–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Choi J, Kim SG, Im JP, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:1223–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Abe S, Oda I, Suzuki H, et al. Long-term surveillance and treatment outcomes of metachronous gastric cancer occurring after curative endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy. 2015;47:1113–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tanabe S, Ishido K, Higuchi K, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional endoscopic resection in a single center. Gastric Cancer. 2014;17:130–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Oda I, Oyama T, Abe S, et al. Preliminary results of multicenter questionnaire study on long-term outcomes of curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. Dig Endosc. 2014;26:214–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kosaka T, Endo M, Toya Y, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a single-center retrospective study. Dig Endosc. 2014;26:183–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Choi MK, Kim GH, Park DY, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a single-center experience. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:4250–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goto O, Fujishiro M, Kodashima S, et al. Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer with special reference to validation for curability criteria. Endoscopy. 2009;41:118–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kato M, Nishida T, Yamamoto K, et al. Scheduled endoscopic surveillance controls secondary cancer after curative endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer: a multicentre retrospective cohort study by Osaka University ESD Study Group. Gut. 2013;62:1425–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Uemura N, Okamoto S, Yamamoto S, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection and the development of gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:784–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yoon SB, Park JM, Lim CH, et al. Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on metachronous gastric cancer after endoscopic resection of gastric tumors: a meta-analysis. Helicobacter. 2014;19:243–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fukase K, Kato M, Kikuchi S, et al. Effect of eradication of Helicobacter pylori on incidence of metachronous gastric carcinoma after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer: an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;372:392–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Choi J, Kim SG, Yoon H, et al. Eradication of Helicobacter pylori after endoscopic resection of gastric tumors does not reduce incidence of metachronous gastric carcinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:793–800 e791.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Maehata Y, Nakamura S, Fujisawa K, et al. Long-term effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on the development of metachronous gastric cancer after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:39–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mori G, Nakajima T, Asada K, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for metachronous gastric cancer after endoscopic resection and successful Helicobacter pylori eradication: results of a large-scale, multicenter cohort study in Japan. Gastric Cancer. 2016;19:911–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hahn KY, Park JC, Kim EH, et al. Incidence and impact of scheduled endoscopic surveillance on recurrence after curative endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:628–638 e621.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:687–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Tanaka S, Asayama N, Shigita K, et al. Towards safer and appropriate application of endoscopic submucosal dissection for T1 colorectal carcinoma as total excisional biopsy: future perspectives. Dig Endosc. 2015;27:216–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y, et al. JGES guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc. 2015;27:417–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:844–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Atkin WS, Valori R, Kuipers EJ, et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition—Colonoscopic surveillance following adenoma removal. Endoscopy. 2012;44(Suppl 3):SE151–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Matsuda T, Chiu HM, Sano Y, et al. Surveillance colonoscopy after endoscopic treatment for colorectal neoplasia: from the standpoint of the Asia-Pacific region. Dig Endosc. 2016;28:342–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:343–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sano Y, Fujii T, Matsuda T, et al. Study design and patient recruitment for the Japan Polyp Study. Open Access J Clin Trials. 2014;6:37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kawamura T, Oda Y, Murakami Y, et al. Relationship between frequency of surveillance colonoscopy and colorectal cancer prevention. Dig Endosc. 2014;26:409–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kahi CJ, Boland CR, Dominitz JA, et al. Colonoscopy surveillance after colorectal cancer resection: recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:337–46.; quiz 347.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, Kyoto Second Red Cross Hospital, Kyoto, Japan

    Takuji Kawamura

Authors
  1. Takuji Kawamura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takuji Kawamura .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China

    Philip W. Y. Chiu

  2. Gastrointestinal Center & Institute of minimally-invasive endoscopic care, Sano Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan

    Yasushi Sano

  3. Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Endoscopy Training and Learning Center, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer & Cardiovascular Diseases, Higashinari-ku, Osaka, Japan

    Noriya Uedo

  4. Gastroenterology Department, Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia

    Rajvinder Singh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kawamura, T. (2021). Surveillance Protocol After Endoscopic Resection. In: Chiu, P.W.Y., Sano, Y., Uedo, N., Singh, R. (eds) Endoscopy in Early Gastrointestinal Cancers, Volume 2. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6778-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6778-5_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6777-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6778-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation