Advertisement

Two-Phase Nonlinear Programming Models and Method for Interval-Valued Multiobjective Cooperative Games

  • Fang-Xuan Hong
  • Deng-Feng Li
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 758)

Abstract

In this paper, we define the concepts of interval-valued cores of interval-valued multiobjective n-person cooperative games and satisfactory degree (or ranking indexes) of comparing intervals with the features of inclusion and/or overlap relations. Hereby, the interval-valued cores can be computed by developing a new two-phase method based on the auxiliary nonlinear programming models. The proposed method can provide cooperative chances under the situations of inclusion and/or overlap relations between intervals in which the traditional interval ranking method may not always assure. The feasibility and applicability of the models and method proposed in this paper are illustrated with a numerical example.

Keywords

Cooperative games Core Interval ranking Mathematical programming Satisfactory degree 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.71231003, No.71171055), Social Science Planning Project of Fujian (No. FJ2015B185) and “Outstanding Young Scientific Research Personnel Cultivation Plan of Colleges and Universities in Fujian Province” as well as “Science and Technology Innovation Team of Colleges and Universities in Fujian Province”.

References

  1. 1.
    Bornstein, C.T., Maculan, N., Pascoal, M., Pinto, L.L.: Multiobjective combinatorial optimization problems with a cost and several bottleneck objective functions: an algorithm with reoptimization. Comput. Oper. Res. 39(9), 969–976 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nishizaki, I., Sakawa, M.: Fuzzy and Multiobjective Games For Conflict Resolution. Physica Heidelberg, Boston (2001)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tanino, T.: Multiobjective Cooperative Games with Restrictions on Coalitions Multiobjective Programming and Goal Programming: Theoretical Results and Practical Applications, pp. 167–174. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (2009). doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-85646-7_16 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hu, B.Q., Wang, S.: A novel approach in uncertain programming - part II: a class of constrained nonlinear programming problems with interval objective functions. J. Ind. Manag. Optim. 2(4), 373–385 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li, D.-F., Nan, J.-X., Zhang, M.-J.: Interval programming models for matrix games with interval payoffs. Optim. Methods Softw. 27(1), 1–16 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li, D.-F.: Decision and Game Theory in Management with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-40712-3 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang, S.J., Wan, Z.: Polymorphic uncertain nonlinear programming model and algorithm for maximizing the fatigue life of v-belt drive. J. Ind. Manag. Optim. 8(2), 493–505 (2012)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hu, C.Y., Kearfott, R.B., Korvin, A.D.: Knowledge Processing with Interval and Soft Computing, pp. 168–172. Springer Verlag, London (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ishihuchi, H., Tanaka, M.: Multiobjective programming in optimization of the interval objective function. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 48(2), 219–225 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moore, R.: Methods and Applications of Interval Analysis. SIAM, Philadelphia (1979)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nakahara, Y., Sasaki, M., Gen, M.: On the linear programming problems with interval coefficients. Int. J. Comput. Ind. Eng. 23(1–4), 301–304 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Senguta, A., Pal, T.K.: On comparing interval numbers. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 127(1), 28–43 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Branzei, R., Alparslan Gök, S.Z., Branzei, O.: Cooperative games under interval uncertainty: on the convexity of the interval undominated cores. CEJOR 19(4), 523–532 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alparslan-Gök, S.Z., Branzei, R., Tijs, S.H.: Cores and stable sets for interval-valued games. Cent. Econ. Res. Tilburg Univ. 1, 1–14 (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liming, W., Qiang, Z.: A further discussion on fuzzy interval cooperative games. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 31(1), 1–7 (2016)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liming, W., Qiang, Z.: Sufficient conditions for the non-emptiness of the interval core. Oper. Res. Manag. Sci. 25(4), 1–4 (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sikorski, K.: Bisection is optimal. Numer. Math. 40, 111–117 (1982)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zhicheng College, Fuzhou UniversityFuzhouChina
  2. 2.School of Economics and ManagementFuzhou UniversityFuzhouChina

Personalised recommendations