Abstract
‘Inclusion’ within education is not a new word. Typically, as educators, we want education to work for all our students and we are required to provide equality within education. Consequently, it is not unusual to hear statements like ‘we are an inclusive school’. However, what exactly does it mean to be an inclusive education provider, on whose terms do we define inclusion, and how do we measure outcomes relative to the goal of being an inclusive school or higher education institute? In this chapter, I reflect on a number of different stories that depict teaching practices and institutional polices that have distanced students from feeling included, as well as those practices and policies which invite students to engage with and enjoy their learning environment. The selected stories are drawn from a number of case studies, namely: children’s and adults’ experiences of education as a student who has an illness and/or disability, work experiences within the education sector when a person has an illness and/or disability, and a tertiary institution’s policy on student attendance. The meta-narrative that emerges from these local stories is that the idea of inclusion is easier to voice and write than actually achieve in practice. An analysis of the competing discursive realities that vie for ascendency within the case studies illustrate why inclusion within education is challenging to action well; despite inclusion education policies being prevalent and/or educators’ intentions towards inclusion being positive. Foucauldian and Freirean concepts have been drawn on in making sense of both the discursive complexity of providing inclusive education and the kinds of systemic actions that enable education to be experienced as equitable and supportive.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ainscow, M. (2005). Developing inclusive education systems: What are the levers for change? Journal of Educational Change, 6(2), 109–124.
Arkwright, J. (2005). Disability: Theorising experiences in the critical analysis of discourse. New Zealand Journal of Disability Studies, 11, 33–55.
Arkwright, J. (2011). Discourse, narrative and agency: A contribution of local stories to disability theory, research and practice. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Arkwright, J. (2014). Policy on attendance at onsite block intensives: A discussion paper. An unpublished paper. Bethlehem Tertiary Institute, Tauranga, New Zealand.
Ballard, K. (1996). Inclusive education in New Zealand: Culture, context and ideology. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26(1), 33–45.
Ballard, K. (2013). Thinking in another way: Ideas for sustainable inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(8), 762–775.
Barton, L. (1993). Labels, markets and inclusive education. In J. Visser & G. Upton (Eds.), Special education in Britain after Warnock (pp. 30–42). London: David Fulton.
Block, P., Brueggemann, W., & McKnight, J. (2016). An other kingdom: Departing the consumer culture. Hoboken: Wiley.
Bourke, P. (2010). Inclusive education reform in Queensland: Implications for policy and practice. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(2), 183–193.
Colley, H., Chadderton, C., & Nixon, L. (2014). Collaboration and contestation in further and higher education partnerships in England: A Bourdieusian field analysis. Critical Studies in Education, 55(2), 104–121.
Davies, B. (1991). The concept of agency: A feminist poststructuralist analysis. Postmodern Critical Theorising, 30, 42–53.
Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20, 43–63.
Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1999). Positioning and personhood. In R. Harré & L. V. Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory (pp. 32–52). Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.
Duckworth, V., Thomas, L., & Bland, D. (2016) Joining the dots between teacher education and widening participation in higher education. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 21(3), 2016.
Foucault, M. (1963). The birth of the clinic. An archaeology of medical perception (trans: Sheridan, A.M., 1997). New York: Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews & other writings (Trans: Gordon, C.). New York: Pantheon.
Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Penguin.
Gerritsen, J. (2016). School-leavers in the money as universities lure students. [online] http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/295806/universities-compete-to-lure-students.
Human Rights Act. (1993). http://www.justice.govt.nz/policy/constitutional-law-and-human-rights/human-rights/domestic-human-rights-protection/human-rights-act-1993.
Mills, C. W. (2000). The sociological imagination. Oxford: University Press.
New Zealand Disability Strategy. (2001). http://www.odi.govt.nz/nzds/.
New Zealand Ministry of Education Official Website. [online] http://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/Principles/Inclusion. Accessed 4 April 2016.
Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. London: MacMillan Education.
Reay, D. (2012). What would a socially just education system look like?: Saving the minnows from the pike. Journal of Education Policy, 27(5), 587–599.
Rutherford, G. (2009). Curriculum matters for all students? Understanding curriculum from the perspectives of disabled students and teacher aides. Curriculum Matters, 5, 90–107.
Rutherford, G. (2011). Doing right by: Teacher aids, disabled students, and relational social justice. Harvard Educational Review, 81(1), 95–118.
Rutherford, G. (2014). Questions of value(s): Neoliberal educational reforms from the perspectives of disabled students and teacher aides. In R. Wills, M. Morton, M. McLean, M. Stephenson & R. Slee (Eds.), Tales from school: Learning disability and state education after administrative reform (pp. 239–254). Rotterdam: Sense. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-893-0_21.
State Services Commission (2016) Lead Toolkit: Toolkit for Employing Disabled People. Report from the New Zealand Ministry of Social Development ISBN: 978-0-947513-04-7 available at: https://www.ssc.govt.nz/sites/all/files/Toolkit-Employing%20Disabled%20People.pdf (accessed 18/12/2017).
Smith, J. (2009). Desiring the kingdom: Worship, worldview and cultural formation. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.
The New Zealand Curriculum. (2007). New Zealand Ministry of Education Official Website. [online] http://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/Principles/Inclusion. Accessed 4 April 2016.
United Nations. (2008). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. United Nations Division for Social Policy and Development website. [online] http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO). (1994). The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. http://www.unesco.org/education/pdf/SALAMA_E.PDF.
Thomas, G. (2013). A review of thinking and research about inclusive education policy with suggestions for a new kind of inclusive thinking. British Educational Research Journal, 39(3), 473–490.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arkwright, J. (2018). Inclusion in Education: ‘A Piggy Back Will Do?’. In: Matthews, C., Edgington, U., Channon, A. (eds) Teaching with Sociological Imagination in Higher and Further Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6725-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6725-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6724-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6725-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)