Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect: Self-Concepts of Gifted Students in a Part-Time Gifted Programme

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Giftedness and Talent

  • 1070 Accesses

Abstract

The optimal learning environment for gifted students has been an issue of debate for many years. Of particular interest to schools is whether or not to group these students together and what the academic, social and emotional effects of such grouping might be. This chapter describes three studies (Niederer, 2011) that examined changes to students’ self-concepts after moving to a gifted class for one day each school week. Study 1 used a case study approach with five gifted students, piloting the methods and materials that were to be used in Studies 2 and 3. In Study 2, 70 gifted students completed both a self-concept and a self-ranking questionnaire before and 6 months after starting a gifted programme for 1 day per week. No overall significant change was found in the students’ self-concepts, although individual students did experience changes. There was a significant positive correlation between changes to individual students’ academic and peer relations self-concepts. For Study 3, 10 students from Study 2 were interviewed: five of them had experienced an improvement in academic self-concept and five had experienced a deterioration in academic self-concept. The five students whose academic self-concepts improved after being in the gifted class were found to have a mastery approach to learning, while the five students whose academic self-concepts deteriorated had a performance approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Benbow, C. P. (1992). Challenging the gifted: grouping and acceleration. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(2), 59–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracken, B. A. (1996). Handbook of self-concept: developmental, social, and clinical considerations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M., & Gavin, D. A. W. (1996). The Shavelson model revisited: testing for the structure of academic self-concept across pre-, early, and late adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M., & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). On the structure of social self-concept for pre-, early, and late adolescents: a test of the Shavelson, Hubner, and Stanton (1976) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 599–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. (2002). Growing up gifted. Columbus: Merrill Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. A. (1966). Campus as a frog pond – application of theory of relative deprivation to career decisions of college men. American Journal of Sociology, 72(1), 17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldhusen, J. F., & Moon, S. M. (1992). Grouping gifted students: issues and concerns. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(2), 63–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, F. (2007). Ten commandments for academic talent development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(2), 93–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M. U. M. (1989). The pursuit of excellence or the search for intimacy? The forced-choice dilemma of gifted youth. Roeper Review, 11(4), 189–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M. U. M. (1998). The ‘Me’ behind the mask: intellectually gifted students and the search for identity. Roeper Review, 20(3), 167–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M. U. M. (2002a). How ability grouping turns big fish into little fish – or does it? Of optical illusions and optimal environments. In W. Vialle & J. G. Geake (Eds.), The gifted enigma: a collection of articles (pp. 131–163). Cheltenham: Hawker Brownlow Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M. U. M. (2002b). Musings: gifted children and the gift of friendship. Understanding Our Gifted, 14(3), 27–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M. U. M. (2003). Musings: giftedness, labeling, and the non-therapeutic dose. Understanding Our Gifted, 15(3), 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (1999). Symbolic interactionism revisited: potential liabilities for the self constructed in the crucible of interpersonal relationships. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45(4), 677–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (1992). Self-concept. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, J. H. (2003). Grouping gifted students. Educational Leadership, 61(2), 89–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huguet, P., Dumas, F., Marsh, H., Regner, I., Wheeler, L., & Suls, J., et al. (2009). Clarifying the role of social comparison in the big-fish-little-pond effect (BFLPE): an integrative study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 156–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireson, J., & Hallam, S. (2009). Academic self-concepts in adolescence: relations with achievement and ability grouping in schools. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 201–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, C. L. C., & Kulik, J. A. (1982). Research synthesis on ability grouping. Educational Leadership, 39(8), 619–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. C. (1992). Meta-analytic findings on grouping programmes. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(2), 73–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, (280–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (1990a). Self description questionnaire - 1: SDQ-I Manual. Sydney: University of Western Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (1990b). The structure of academic self-concept: the Marsh/Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 623–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (2008). Big-fish-little-pond-effect: total long-term negative effects of school-average ability on diverse educational outcomes over 8 adolescent/early adult years. International Journal of Psychology, 43(3–4), 53–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Byrne, B. M., & Shavelson, R. J. (1988). A multi-faceted academic self-concept: its hierarchical structure and its relation to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 366–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Chessor, D., Craven, R., & Roche, L. (1995). The effects of gifted and talented programmes on academic self-concept – the big fish strikes again. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 285–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 133–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. T. (2003). Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept – a cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58(5), 364–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Koller, O., Baumert, J. (2000). Reunification of East and West German School Systems and the big fish little pond effect on academic self-concept. German reunification and self-concept (p. 16). Western Sydney University, Macarthur, Australia. Max-Planck-Institut fuer Bildungsforschung, Berlin, West Germany. Australian Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Koller, O., & Baumert, J. (2001). Reunification of East and West German school systems: longitudinal multilevel modeling study of the big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 321–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., & Parker, J. W. (1984). Determinants of student self-concept – is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don’t learn to swim as well? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(1), 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Papaioannou, A., & Theodorakis, Y. (2006). Causal ordering of physical self-concept and exercise behavior: reciprocal effects model and the influence of physical education teachers. Health Psychology, 25(3), 316–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., & Shavelson, R. J. (1985). Self-concept: its multifaceted, hierarchical structure. Educational Psychologist, 20, 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Seaton, M., Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., Hau, K. T., & O’Mara, A. J., et al. (2008). The big-fish-little-pond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20(3), 319–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., Koller, O., & Baumert, J. (2005). Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: reciprocal effects models of causal ordering. Child Development, 76(2), 397–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., Walker, R., & Debus, R. (1991). Subject-specific components of academic self-concept and self-efficacy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16(4), 331–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neihart, M. (2007). The socioaffective impact of acceleration and ability grouping: recommendations for best practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(4), 330–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niederer, K. (2011). The big fish little pond effect: self-concepts of gifted students in a part-time, gifted program. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Preckel, F., & Brull, M. (2008). Grouping the gifted and talented: are gifted girls most likely to suffer the consequences? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32(1), 54–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preckel, F., & Brull, M. (2010). The benefit of being a big fish in a big pond: contrast and assimilation effects on academic self-concept. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 522–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preckel, F., Gotz, T., & Frenzel, A. (2010). Ability grouping of gifted students: effects on academic self-concept and boredom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 451–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, N. M., Reis, S. M., Neihart, M., & Moon, S. M. (2002). Social and emotional issues facing gifted and talented students: what have we learned and what should we do now? In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson & S. M. Moon (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: what do we know? (pp. 267–288). Waco: Prufrock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, C. M. (2009). The impact of academic self-concept, expectations and the choice of learning strategy on academic achievement: the case of business students. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(5), 523–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, K. B. (2007). Lessons learned about educating the gifted and talented: a synthesis of the research on educational practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(4), 382–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seaton, M., Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2009). Earning its place as a pan-human theory: universality of the big-fish-little-pond effect across 41 culturally and economically diverse countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 403–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seaton, M., Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2010). Big-fish-little-pond effect: generalizability and moderation-two sides of the same coin. American Educational Research Journal, 47(2), 390–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept – validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46(3), 407–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, L. K. (1997). The construct of asynchronous development. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(3–4), 36–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaalvik, E. M., & Hagtvet, K. A. (1990). Academic achievement and self-concept – an analysis of causal predominance in a developmental perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(2), 292–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, A. J. (1998). Programmes for the gifted: to be or not to be. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 22(1), 3–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: a meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 111–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, A. S., Chow, A. P. Y., Chow, P. C. W., Liu, W. P. (2005). Self-concept of gifted students: the reddening and blackening effects. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Consultant in Gifted Education, Auckland, New Zealand

    Kate Niederer

Authors
  1. Kate Niederer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kate Niederer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand

    Nadine Ballam

  2. Faculty of Education, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand

    Roger Moltzen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Niederer, K. (2017). The Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect: Self-Concepts of Gifted Students in a Part-Time Gifted Programme. In: Ballam, N., Moltzen, R. (eds) Giftedness and Talent. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6701-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6701-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6700-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6701-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation