Skip to main content

Policy Options for Reducing Water for Agriculture in Saudi Arabia

Part of the Water Resources Development and Management book series (WRDM)

Abstract

As populations and economies grow, a megatrend that will increasingly affect both developed and emerging economies is the policy trade -off between managing water resources and achieving food security objectives. This policy trade-off is very relevant in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, which represent some of the most water scarce regions of the world and are also intent on achieving food security through domestic agriculture production. We offer a case study on the policy options for reducing water consumption while maintaining food security and farmer welfare in the GCC’s largest country, Saudi Arabia . Specifically, we explore how crop substitution can reduce aggregate water use without compromising the current level of food security or farmer welfare. Additionally, we assess the potential social implications of crop substitution options in order to better understand the political feasibility of various policy choices. The results suggest that if water usage is to be minimised while maintaining food production and farmer welfare , then the primary candidates for reduction are crops or livestock with large water intensity and low revenue and/or low production. Eliminating these types of crops would yield higher water savings than moderate reductions across a large portfolio of crops at the lowest political cost.

Keywords

  • Saudi Arabia
  • Water conservation
  • Food security
  • Linear programme
  • Political bargaining

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 12.1

Sources FAO (2015), Min. of Agriculture (2014)

Fig. 12.2
Fig. 12.3
Fig. 12.4
Fig. 12.5

References

  • Almarai Farming Division (2010) Farming in the desert [PDF slideshow]. Retrieved from http://www.organicpastoral.co.nz/site/organic/images/Desert.pdf

  • Al-Shayaa MS, Baig MB, Straquadine GS (2012) Agricultural extension in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: difficult present and demanding future. J Anim Plant Sci 22(1):239–246. ISSN: 1018-7081

    Google Scholar 

  • Arab Organization for Agricultural Development (2013) Arab agriculture statistics year book (vol 33). Retrieved 2015 from League of Arab States Arab Organization for Agriculture Development website: http://www.aoad.org/

  • Arrow KJ (1950) A difficulty in the concept of social welfare. J Polit Econ 58(4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ (1951) Social choice and individual values. Yale University Press, New Haven (1963, second edition)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bankes S, Wise B (2015) Non-spatial probabilistic condorcet election methodology. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.02509

  • Becker GS (1983) A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. Q J Econ 98:371–400

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Berger J (2010) Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Black D (1948) On the rationale of group decision-making. J Polit Econ 56:23–34

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • British Petroleum (2015) BP statistical review of world energy. Retrieved from British Petroleum website: http://www.bp.com

  • Brown A, Matlock D (2011) A review of water scarcity indices and methodologies (White Paper #106). University of Arkansas: The Sustainability Consortium

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge J, King C (2015) Bunge, Saudi venture to buy 50.1% stake in Canadian Wheat Board. Wall Street J. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com

  • Caritat MJAN (1785) Essay on the application of analysis to the probability of majority decisions

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin PJ (1992) Probabilistic voting theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs A (1957) An economic theory of political action in a democracy. J Polit Econ 65(2):135–150

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Enelow JM, Hinich MJ (1990) Advances in the spatial theory of voting. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2002) The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2001. FAO, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2015) Food and Agriculture Data [FAOSTAT]. Retrieved Aug 11, 2015, from http://faostat.fao.org

  • General Authority for Statistics Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (2015) Annual yearbook 2015. Retrieved 2015 from The General Authority for Statistics website: https://www.stats.gov.sa/en

  • Gustafson RL (1958) Implications of recent research on optimal storage rules. J Farm Econ 40(2):290–300

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling H (1929) Stability in competition. Econ J 39:41–57

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys A (2011) The report: Saudi Arabia 2010. Oxford Business Group, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman TW (2010) Saudi Arabia’s quest for food security. Middle East Policy 17(1):123–231. doi:10.1111/j.14754967.2010.00428.x

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Matar W, Murphy F, Pierru A, Rioux B, Wogan D (2017) Efficient industrial energy use: the first step in transitioning Saudi Arabia’s energy mix. Energy Policy 105:80–92

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY (2010) The green, blue and grey water footprint of farm animals and animal products. Volume 2: Appendices. UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education

    Google Scholar 

  • Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY (2012) The blue water footprint of electricity from hydropower. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 22:123–231. doi:10.5194/hess-16-179-2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agriculture (2014) Agriculture statistical year book, Issue #27. Agricultural Research and Development Affairs, Saudi Arabia. Retrieved 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Moench M (2002) Water and the potential for social instability: livelihoods, migration and the building of society. Nat Resour Forum 26(3):195–204. doi:10.1111/0165-0203.00021

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mousa H (2015) Grain and feed annual (GAIN Report No. SA1502). USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, U.S. Embassy Riyadh

    Google Scholar 

  • Multsch S, Al-Rumaikhani YA, Frede HG, Breuer L (2013) A site-specific agricultural water requirement and footprint estimator (SPARE: WATER 1.0). Geosci Model Dev Discuss 6(1):645–684. doi:10.5194/gmdd-6-645-2013

  • Negishi T (1972) General equilibrium theory and international trade. North-Holland Publishing Company

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadik A, El-Solh M, Saab N (2014) Food security: challenges and prospects. Arab Environment 7, Retrieved from http://www.afedonline.org/Report2014/E/p01-11%20eng%20preface.pdf

  • Sen A (1982) The food problem: theory and policy. Third World Q 4(3):447–459. doi:10.1080/01436598208419641

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent P (2008) Saudi Arabia: an environmental overview. Taylor & Francis/Belkema, The Netherlands

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wise B, Lester L, Efird B (2015) Multi-dimensional bargaining in KTAB. KAPSARC, Saudi Arabia

    Google Scholar 

  • Woertz E (2013) Oil for food: the global food crisis and the Middle East. Oxford University Press, United Kingdom

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2015) World development indicators, [DataBank]. Retrieved Aug, 2, 2015, from http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?Code=SP.POP.TOTL&id=af3ce82b&report_name=Popular_indicators&populartype=series&ispopular=y#

  • World Trade Organization (2011) Trade policy review report by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (Report Paper No. 256). Retrieved from World Trade Organization website: https://www.wto.org

  • Zermelo, E. (1928). Die Berechnung der Turnier-Ergebnisse als ein Maximumproblem der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Math Z 29, 1929, S. pp 436–460

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mathieu Carey and Berenice Garcia Tellez for their research assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Napoli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Table 12.3 includes production values referenced from Saudi Arabia Ministry of Agriculture, Water Footprint data from (Multsch et al. 2013). Revenue data were extracted from the FAO’s statistics database (FAO 2015). Data exceptions include Water footprint data for cabbages, eggs, fresh fruits, milk (cow, camel and goat), meat (camel, chicken cow, goat and sheep) , honey, nuts, and pulses), which extracted from (Mekonnen and Hoekstra 2010).

Table 12.3 Data input for linear programming model

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Napoli, C., Wise, B., Wogan, D., Yaseen, L. (2018). Policy Options for Reducing Water for Agriculture in Saudi Arabia. In: Biswas, A., Tortajada, C., Rohner, P. (eds) Assessing Global Water Megatrends. Water Resources Development and Management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6695-5_12

Download citation