Advertisement

Potential of Beneficial Bacteria as Eco-friendly Options for Chemical-Free Alternative Agriculture

  • Ch. Srinivasarao
  • M. ManjunathEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Plant-microbial interactions are important determinants of crop and soil health. Microbial inoculants, viz. Azotobacter, Azospirillum, Rhizobium, Pseudomonas and Bacillus, have been commonly employed for increasing plant growth and crop yields and improving soil health in rice, wheat, legumes, vegetables and other cropping systems. Around the world, different bacterial isolates have proven their abilities to improve plant growth through colonization of roots, production of plant hormones (such as indole acetic acid, cytokinins), biological nitrogen fixation, organic matter decomposition, solubilization, transformation and mobilization of nutrients and improve fertility of soil, besides controlling plant diseases. This compilation critically analyses the advantages of such biological inputs particularly bacteria, emphasizing their roles and the need to augment the incorporation of such biological inputs by gradually restricting the use of chemical inputs by employing suitable combinations of useful microbes for chemical-free sustainable agricultural production.

Keywords

Plant-microbe interactions PGPR Nutrient enrichment Soil fertility 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, India, for providing necessary facilities towards undertaking this study.

References

  1. Abd-Alla MH (1994) Use of organic phosphorus by Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viceae phosphatases. Biol Fertil Soils 18:216–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Afzal AM, Ashraf SA, Asad FM (2005) Effect of phosphate solubilizing microorganism on phosphorus uptake, yield and yield traits of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in rainfed area. Int J Agric Biol 7:207–209Google Scholar
  3. Ahemad M, Kirbet M (2014) Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: current perspective. J King Saud Uni Sci 26:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amara MAT, Dahdoh MSA (1997) Effect of inoculation with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on yield and uptake of nutrients by wheat grown on sandy soil. Egypt J Soil Sci 37:467–484Google Scholar
  5. Antoun H, Beauchamp J, Goussard N, Chabot R, Lalande R (1998) Potential of Rhizobium and Bradyrhizobium species as plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on non-legumes: Effect on radishes (Raphanus sativus L.) Plant Soil 204:57–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arkhipova TN, Prinsen E, Veselov SU, Martynenko EV, Melentiev AI, Kodoyarova GR (2005) Ability of bacterium Bacillus subtilis to produce cytokinins and to influence the growth and endogenous hormone content of lettuce plants. Plant Soil 272:201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arkhipova TN, Prinsen E, Veselov SU, Martynenko EV, Melentiev AI, Kodoyarova GR (2007) Cytokinin producing bacteria enhance plant growth in drying soil. Plant Soil 292:305–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arshad M, Frankenberger WT Jr (1998) Plant growth-regulating substances in the rhizosphere: microbial production and functions. Adv Agron 62:45–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Asghar HN, Zahir ZA, Arshad M, Khaliq A (2002) Relationship between in vitro production of auxins by rhizobacteria and their growth promoting activities in Brassica juncea. L. Biol Fertil Soils 35:231–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bach E, Seger GDS, Fernandes GDC, Lisboa BB, Passaglia LMP (2016) Evaluation of biological control and rhizosphere competence of plant growth promoting bacteria. Appl Soil Ecol 99:141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bakker PAHM, Pieterse CMJ, Van Loon LC (2007) Induced systemic resistance by fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. Phytopathology 97:239–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bano N, Musarrat J (2004) Characterization of a novel carbofuran degrading Pseudomonas sp. with collateral biocontrol and plant growth promoting potential. FEMS Microbiol Lett 231:13–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Barea JM, Gryndler M, Lemanceau P, Schu¨epp H, Azco’n R (2002) The rhizosphere of mycorrhizal plants. In: Gianinazzi S, Schu¨epp H, Barea JM, Haselwandter K (eds) Mycorrhiza technology in agriculture: from genes to bioproducts. Birkha¨user, Basel, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  14. Barea JM, Azco’n R, Azco’n-Aguilar C (2004) Mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. In: Varma A, Abbott L, Werner D, Hampp R (eds) Plant surface microbiology. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 351–371Google Scholar
  15. Bashan Y, Holguin G (1998) Proposal for the division of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria into two classifications: biocontrol- PGPB (plant growth-promoting bacteria) and PGPB. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1225–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bashan Y, Levanony H (1991) Alterations in membrane potential and in proton efflux in plant roots induced by Azospirillum brasilense. Plant Soil 137:99–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Beck EH, Fettig S, Knake C, Hartig K, Bhattarai T (2007) Specific and unspecific responses of plants to cold and drought stress. J Biosci 32(3):501–510Google Scholar
  18. Belimov AA, Ivanchikov YA, Yudkin LV, Khamova OF, Postavskaya SM, Popolzukhina PV, Shmakova AA, Kozlova YG (1999) New strains of associative growth-stimulating bacteria dominating the rhizoplane of barley seedlings: characterization and introduction. Microbiology 68(3):392–397Google Scholar
  19. Berg G, Krechel A, Ditz M, Sikora RA, Ulrich A, Hallmann J (2005) Endophytic and ectophytic potato-associated bacterial communities differ in structure and antagonistic function against plant pathogenic fungi. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 51:215–229Google Scholar
  20. Beneduzi A, Ambrosini A, Passaglia LMP (2012) Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR): their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents. Genet Mol Biol 35(4):1044–1051Google Scholar
  21. Bensalim S, Nowak J, Asiedu SK (1998) A plant growth promoting rhizobacterium and temperature effects on performance of 18 clones of potato. Am J Potato Res 75:145–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bent E, Chanway CP (1998) The growth-promoting effects of a bacterial endophyte on lodgepole pine are partially inhibited by the presence of other rhizobacteria. Can J Microbiol 44:980–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bhardwaj D, Ansari MW, Sahoo RK, Tuteja N (2014) Biofertilizers function as key player in sustainable agriculture by improving soil fertility, plant tolerance and crop productivity. Microb Cell Fact 13:66PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Bishop ML, Chang AC, Lee RWK (1994) Enzymatic mineralization of organic phosphorus in a volcanic soil in Chile. Soil Sci 157:238–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Biswas JC, Ladha JK, Dazzo FB (2000) Rhizobial inoculation influences seedling vigor and yield of rice. Agron J 92:880–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Bloemberg VG, Lugtenberg JJ (2001) Molecular basis of plant growth promotion and biocontrol by rhizobacteria. Curr Opin Plant Biol 4:343–350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Bowen GD, Rovira AD (1999) The rhizosphere and its management to improve plant growth. Adv Agron 66:1–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Brader G, Compant S, Mitter B, Trognitz F, Sessitsch A (2014) Metabolic potential of endophytic bacteria. Curr Opin Biotechnol Sci 27:30–37Google Scholar
  29. Bruto M, Prigent-Combaret C, Muller D, Moënne-Loccoz Y (2014) Analysis of genes contributing to plant-beneficial functions in plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and related Proteobacteria. Sci Rep 4:6261Google Scholar
  30. Buscot F (2005) What are soils? In: Buscot F, Varma S (eds) Microorganisms in soils: roles in genesis and functions. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Cameron RK, Dixon R, Lamb C (1994) Biologically induced systemic acquired resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 5:715–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Chanway CP (1997) Inoculation of tree roots with plant growth promoting soil bacteria: an emerging technology for reforestation. For Sci 43:99–112Google Scholar
  33. Chaturvedi H, Singh V, Gupta G (2016) Potential of bacterial endophytes as plant growth promoting factors. J Plant Pathol Microbiol 7:376. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7471.1000376 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Chen C, Bauske EM, Musson G, Rodriguez-Kabaña R, Kloepper JW (1994) Biological control of Fusarium on cotton by use of endophytic bacteria. Biol Control 5:83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Chin-A-Woeng TF, de Priester W, Van der Bij AJ, Lugtenberg BJ (1997) Description of the colonization of a gnotobiotic tomato rhizosphere by Pseudomonas fluorescens biocontrol strain WCS365, using scanning electron microscopy. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 10:79–86Google Scholar
  36. Chin-A-Woeng TFC, Thomas-Oates JE, Ben LJJ, Bloemberg GV (2001) Introduction of the phzH Gene of Pseudomonas chlororaphis PCL1391 extends the range of biocontrol ability of phenazine-1-carboxylic acid-producing Pseudomonas spp. Strains. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 14(8):1006–1015PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Cohen AC, Travaglia CN, Bottini R, Piccoli PN (2009) Participation of abscisic acid and gibberellins produced by endophytic Azospirillum in the alleviation of drought effects in maize. Bot 87:455–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Compant S, Duffy B, Nowak J, Barka EA (2005a) Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4951–4959PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Compant S, Reiter B, Sessitsch A, Nowak J, Clément C, Barka EA (2005b) Endophytic colonization of Vitis vinifera L. by a plant growth-promoting bacterium, Burkholderia sp. strain PsJN. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:1685–1693PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Costa JM, Loper JE (1994) Characterization of siderophore production by the biological control agent Enterobacter cloacae. Mol Plant Microbe Intract 7:440–448Google Scholar
  41. Costacurta A, Vanderleyden J (1995) Accumulation of phytohormones by plant associated bacteria. Crit Rev Microbiol 21:1–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Creus CM, Sueldo RJ, Barassi CA (2004) Water relations and yield in Azospirillum- inoculated wheat exposed to drought in the field. Can J Bot 82:273–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Datta C, Basu PS (2000) Indole acetic acid production by a Rhizobium species from root nodules of a leguminous shrub, Cajanus cajan. Microbiol Res 155:123–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. de Souza R, Ambrosini A, Luciane M, Passagliac P (2015) Plant growth-promoting bacteria as inoculants in agricultural soils. Genet Mol Biol 38(4):401–419PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Demeyer G, Capieau K, Audenaert K, Buchala A, Métraux JP, Höfte M (1999) Nanogram amounts of salicylic acid produced by the rhizobacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa 7NSK2 activate the systemic acquired resistance pathway in bean. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 12:450–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Donnell PJ, Schmelz E, Block A, Miersch O, Wasternack C, Jones JB et al (2003) Multiple hormones act sequentially to mediate a susceptible tomato pathogen defense response. Plant Physiol 133:1181–1189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Enebak SA, Wei G, Kloepper JW (1997) Effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on loblolly and slash pine seedlings. For Sci 44:139–144Google Scholar
  48. Esitken A, Ercisli S, Karlidag H, Sahin F (2005) Potential use of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in organic apricot production. In: Proceedings of the international science conference on environmentally friendly fruit growing, Tartu-Estonia, September 7–9, pp 90–97Google Scholar
  49. Falardeau J, Wise C, Novitsky L, Avis TJ (2013) Ecological and mechanistic insights into the direct and indirect antimicrobial properties of Bacillus subtilis lipopeptides on plant pathogens. J Chem Ecol 39:869–878PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Fankem H, Ngonkot L, Deubel A, Quinn J, Merbach W, Etoa F, Nwaga D (2008) Solubilization of inorganic phosphates and plant growth promotion by strains of Pseudomonas fluorescens isolated from acidic soils of Cameroon. Afr J Microbiol Res 2:171–178Google Scholar
  51. Farrar K, Bryant D, Cope-selby N (2014) Understanding and engineering beneficial plant–microbe interactions: plant growth promotion in energy crops. Plant Biotechnol J 12(9):1193–1206PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Fatima Z, Saleemi M, Zia M, Sultan T, Aslam M, Riaz-ur-Rehman, Chaudhary MF (2009) Antifungal activity of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria isolates against Rhizoctonia solani in wheat. Afr J Biotechnol 8:219–225Google Scholar
  53. Fernando WGD, Nakkeeran S, Zhang Y (2005) Biosynthesis of antibiotics by PGPR and its relation in biocontrol of plant diseases. In: Siddiqui ZA (ed) PGPR: Biocontrol and biofertilization. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 67–109Google Scholar
  54. Fendrihan S, Constantinescu F, Sicuia OA, Dinu S (2016) Beneficial Bacillus strains improve plant resistance to phytopathogens: a review. Int J Environ Agric Biotechnol (IJEAB) 1(2):137–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Frankenberger WT, Arshad JRM (1995) Phytohormones in soil microbial production and function. Marcel Deker, New York, p 503Google Scholar
  56. Gagné-Bourque F, Bertrand A, Claessens A, Aliferis KA, Jabaji S (2016) Alleviation of drought stress and metabolic changes in timothy (Phleum pratense L.) colonized with Bacillus subtilis B26. Front Plant Sci 7:584PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Gamalero E, Glick BR (2015) Bacterial modulation of plant ethylene levels. Plant Physiol 169:13–22PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Garcia-Gutierrez L, Zeriouh H, Romero D, Cubero J, de Vicente A, Perez-Garcia A (2013) The antagonistic strain Bacillus subtilis UMAF6639 also confers protection to melon plants against cucurbit powdery mildew by activation of jasmonate and salicylic acid-dependent defence responses. Microbial. Biotech 6(3):264–274Google Scholar
  59. George EF, Hall MA, De Klerk GJ (eds) (2008) Plant propagation by tissue culture, 3rd edn. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 104–204Google Scholar
  60. Ghosh S, Penterman JN, Little RD, Chavez R, Glick BR (2003) Three newly isolated plant growth-promoting bacilli facilitate the seedling growth of canola, Brassica campestris. Plant Physiol Biochem 41:277–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Glick BR (1995) The enhancement of plant growth by free living bacteria. Can J Microbiol 41:109–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Glick BR, Liu C, Ghosh S, Dumbroff EB (1997) The effect of the plant growth promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida GR 12–2 on the development of canola seedlings subjected to various stresses. Soil Biol Biochem 29:1233–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Graham PH, Vance CP (2000) Nitrogen fixation in perspective: an overview of research and extension needs. Field Crops Res 65:93–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Gupta G, Parihar SS, Ahirwar NK, Snehi SK, Singh V (2015) Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR): current and future prospects for development of sustainable agriculture. J Microbial Biochem Technol 7:2Google Scholar
  65. Haahtela K, Konkoo R, Laakso T, Williams PH, Korhonem TK (1990) Root associated Enterobacter and Klebsiella in Poa pratensis: Characterization of an iron scavenging system and a substance stimulating root hair production. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 3:358–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Hammerschmidt R, Kuc J (1995) Induced resistance to disease in plants. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Hardarson G (1993) Methods for enhancing symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Plant Soil 152:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Hardoim PR, van Overbeek LS, Berg G, Pirttilä AM, Compant S, Campisano A et al (2015) The hidden world within plants: ecological and evolutionary considerations for defining functioning of microbial endophytes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 79:293–320PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Hayat S, Hayat Q, Alyemeni MN, Wani AS, Pichtel J, Ahmad A (2012) Role of proline under changing environments. Plant Signal Behav 7:1456–1466PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Hegazi NA, Fayez M, Amin G, Hamza MA, Abbas M, Youssef H, Monib M (1998) Diazotrophs associated with non-legumes grown in sandy soils. In: Malik KA, Mirza MS, Ladha JK (eds) Nitrogen fixation with non-legumes. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 209–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Hilali A, Przrost D, Broughton WJ, Antoun A (2001) Effects de I'inoculation avec des souches de Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii sur la croissance du bl'e dans deux sols du Marco. Can J Microbiol 47:590–593PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Horrigan L, Lawrence R, Walker P (2002) How sustainable agriculture can address the environmental and human health harms of industrial agriculture. Environ Health Perspect 110:445–456PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Huang L, Zhang F, Wang W, Zhou Y, Fu B, Li Z (2014) Comparative transcriptome sequencing of tolerant rice introgression line and its parents in response to drought stress. BMC Genomics 15:1026Google Scholar
  74. IARI (2014) Technological options for enhanced productivity and profit. Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110 012, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  75. Jasim B, Jimtha John C, Mathew J, Radhakrishnan EK (2013) Plant growth promoting potential of endophytic bacteria isolated from Piper nigrum. Plant Growth Regul 71(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Kasim WA, Osman ME, Omar MN, Abd El-Daim IA, Bejai S, Meijer J (2013) Control of drought stress in wheat using plant-growth-promoting bacteria. J Plant Growth Regul 32:122–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Katsy EI (2005) In molecular bases of the relationships between associative microorganisms and Ppants. Nauka, Moscow, pp 17–45Google Scholar
  78. Kell C, Schnider U, Maurhofer M, Voisard C, Laville J, Burger U, Wirthner P, Hass D, Defago G (1992) Suppression of root diseases by Pseudomonas fluorescens CHAO: Importance of the bacterial secondary metabolite 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 5:4–13Google Scholar
  79. Kennedy AC (1998) The rhizosphere and spermosphere. In: Sylvia DM, Fuhrmann JJ, Hartel PG, Zuberer DA (eds) Principles and applications of soil microbiology. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, pp 389–407Google Scholar
  80. Kennedy IR, Islam N (2001) The current and potential contribution of asymbiotic nitrogen fixation to nitrogen requirements on farms: a review. Aus J Exp Agric 41:447–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Kennedy IR, Choudhury ATMA, Kecskes ML (2004) Nonsymbiotic bacterial diazotrophs in crop-farming systems: can their potential for plant growth promotion be better exploited? Soil Biol Biochem 36:1229–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Khalid A, Arshad M, Zahir ZA (2004) Screening plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for improving growth and yield of wheat. J App Microbiol 96(3):473–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Kloepper JW (1993) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria as biological control agents. In: Metting FB Jr (ed) Soil microbial ecology-applications in agricultural and environmental management. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 255–274Google Scholar
  84. Kloepper JW, Lifshitz K, Zablotowicz RM (1989) Free-living bacterial inocula for enhancing crop productivity. Trends Biotechnol 7:39–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Kloepper JW, Rodriguez-Kabana R, Zehnder GW, Murphy J, Sikora E, Fernandez C (1999) Plant root-bacterial interactions in biological control of soilborne diseases and potential extension to systemic and foliar diseases. Aus J Plant Pathol 28:27–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Kloepper JW, Ryu CM, Zhang SA (2004) Induced systemic resistance and promotion of plant growth by Bacillus spp. Phytopathol 94(11):1259–1266Google Scholar
  87. Kucey RMN, Janzen HH, Leggett MM (1989) Microbially mediated increase in plant-available phosphorus. Adv Agron 42:199–228Google Scholar
  88. Kumar M, Prasanna R, Bidyarani N, Babu S, Mishra KBK, Adak A, Jauhari S, Yadav K, Singh R, Saxena AK (2013) Evaluating the plant growth promoting ability of thermotolerant bacteria and cyanobacteria and their interactions with seed spice crops. Scient Hortic. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2013.09.014
  89. Lal R (2003) Soil erosion and the global carbon budget. Environ Int 29:437–450Google Scholar
  90. Lal R, Blum WH, Valentine C, Stewart BA (eds) (1997) Methods for assessment of soil degradation. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  91. Lalande R, Bissonnette N, Coutlée D, Antoun H (1989) Identification of rhizobacteria from maize and determination of their plant-growth promoting potential. Plant Soil 115:7–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Lambrecht M, Okon Y, Vande Broek A, Vanderleyden J (2000) Indole-3-acetic acid: a reciprocal signaling molecule in bacteria plant interactions. Trends Microbiol 8:298–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Lareen A, Burton F, Schäfer P (2016) Plant root-microbe communication in shaping root microbiomes. Plant Mol Biol 90:575–587PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Lee SW, Cooksey DA (2000) Genes expressed in Pseudomonas putida during colonization of a plant-pathogenic fungus. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:2764–2772PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Lee S, Flores-Encarnacion M, Contreras-Zentella M, Garcia-Flores L, Escamilla JE, Kennedy C (2004) Indole-3-acetic acid biosynthesis is deficient in Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus strains with mutations in cytochrome C biogenesis genes. J Bacteriol 186:5384–5391PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Loper JE, Schroth MN (1986) Influence of bacterial source of indole-3-acetic acid of root elongation of sugar beet. Phytopathology 76:386–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Lugtenberg B, Kamilova F (2009) Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 63:541–556Google Scholar
  98. Lugtenberg BJJ, Kravchenko LV, Simons M (1999) Tomato seed and root exudates sugars: composition, utilization by Pseudomonas biocontrol strains and role in rhizosphere colonization. Environ Microbiol 1:439–446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Manjunath M, Prasanna R, Sharma P, Nain L, Singh R (2011) Developing PGPR consortia using novel genera Providencia and Alcaligenes along with cyanobacteria for wheat. Arch Agron Soil Sci 57(8):873–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Manjunath M, Saha S, Venkataravanappa V, Rai AB (2015) Role of soil microbes in sustainable soil health and agricultural production. In: Roy AK (ed) Emerging technologies of the 21st century. New India Publishing Agency, New Delhi, pp 213–223Google Scholar
  101. Manjunath M, Kanchan A, Ranjan K, Venkatachalam S, Prasanna R, Ramakrishnan B, Hossain F, Nain L, Shivay YS, Rai AB, Singh B (2016) Beneficial cyanobacteria and eubacteria synergistically enhance bioavailability of soil nutrients and yield of okra. Heliyon e00066:1–28Google Scholar
  102. Manske GGB, Ortiz-Monasterio JI, Van Ginkel M, Gonzalez RM, Fischer RA, Rajaram S, Vlek PLG (2001) Importance of P uptake efficiency versus P utilization for wheat yield in acid and calcareous soils in Mexico. Eur J Agron 14:261–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Marulanda A, Porcel R, Barea JM, Azco’n R (2007) Drought tolerance and antioxidant activities in lavender plants colonized by native drought-tolerant or drought-sensitive Glomus species. Microbial Ecol 54:543–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Maurhofer M, Hase C, Meuwly P, Metraux JP, Defago G (1994) Induction of systemic resistance of tobacco to tobacco necrosis virus by the root-colonizing Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHAO : influence of the gacA gene and of pyoverdine production. Phytopathology 84:139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Mayak S, Tirosh T, Glick BR (2004a) Plant growth-promoting bacteria confer resistance in tomato plants to salt stress. Plant Physiol Biochem 42:565–572PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Mayak S, Tirosh T, Glick BR (2004b) Plant growth-promoting bacteria confer resistance to water stress in tomato and pepper. Plant Sci 166:525–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Minorsky PV (2008) On the inside. Plant Physiol 146:323–324PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Mitter B, Pfaffenbichler N, Sessitsch A (2016) Plant–microbe partnerships in 2020. Microbial Biotechnol 9(5):635–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Naiman AD, Latronico A, Salamone EG (2009) Inoculation of wheat with Azospirillum brasilense and Pseudomonas fluorescens: impact on the production and culturable rhizosphere microflora. Eur J Soil Biol 45:44–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Nain L, Rana A, Joshi M, Shrikrishna JD, Kumar D, Shivay YS, Paul S, Prasanna R (2010) Evaluation of synergistic effects of bacterial and cyanobacterial strains as biofertilizers for wheat. Plant Soil 331:217–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Nannipieri P, Ascher J, Ceccherini MT, Landi L, Pietramellara G, Renella G (2003) Microbial diversity and soil functions. Eur J Soil Sci 54:655–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Napier R, Venis MA (1995) Auxin action and auxin-binding proteins. New Phytol 129:167–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Negi S, Ivanchenko MG, Muday GK (2008) Ethylene regulates lateral root formation and auxin transport in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 55:175–187Google Scholar
  114. Ngumbi E, JKloepper J (2016) Bacterial-mediated drought tolerance: current and future prospects. Appl Soil Ecol 105:109–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Nowak J (1998) Benefits of in vitro ‘biotization’ of plant tissue cultures with microbial inoculants. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 34:122–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. O’Connell PF (1992) Sustainable agriculture—a valid alternative. Outlook Agric 21:5–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Oberson E, Frossard Bühlmann C, Mayer J, Mader P, Luscher A (2013) Nitrogen fixation and transfer in grass-clover leys under organic and conventional cropping systems. Plant Soil 371:237–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Okon Y, Labandera-Gonzalez CA (1994) Agronomic applications of Azospirillum: an evaluation of 20 years world-wide field inoculation. Soil Biol Biochem 26:1591–1601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Oteino N, Lally RD, Kiwanuka S, Lloyd A, Ryan D, Germaine KJ, Dowling DN (2015) Plant growth promotion induced by phosphate solubilizing endophytic Pseudomonas isolates. Front Microbiol 6:745. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00745 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Pace NR (1997) A molecular view of microbial diversity in the biosphere. Sci 276:734–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Park M, Kim C, Yang J, Lee H, Shin W, Kim S, Sa T (2005) Potential of bacterial indole acetic acid to induce adventitious shoots in plant tissue culture. Microbiol Res 160(2):127–133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Patten CL, Glick BR (1996) Bacterial biosynthesis of indole-3- acetic acid. Can J Microbiol 42:207–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Pereg L, McMillan M (2015) Scoping the potential uses of beneficial microorganisms for increasing productivity in cotton cropping systems. Soil Biol Biochem 80:349–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Persello-Cartieaux F, Nussaume L, Robaglia C (2003) Tales from the underground: molecular plant–rhizobacteria interactions. Plant Cell Environ 26:189–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. CMJ, Zamioudis C, Berendsen RL, Weller DM, Van Wees SCM, Bakker PAHM (2014) Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes. Annu Rev Phytopathol 52:347–375Google Scholar
  126. Pieterse CMJ, Zamioudis C, Berendsen RL, Weller DM, Van Wees SCM, Bakker PAHM (2014) Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes. Annu Rev Phytopathol 52:347–375Google Scholar
  127. Pirttila A, Joensuu P, Pospiech H, Jalonen J, Hohtola A (2004) Bud endophytes of Scots pine produce adenine derivatives and other compounds that affect morphology and mitigate browning of callus cultures. Physiol Plant 121:305–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Poi SC, Kabi MC (1979) Effect of Azotobacter inoculation on growth and yield of jute and wheat. Ind J Agric Sci 49:478–480Google Scholar
  129. Polyanskaya LM, Vedina OT, Lysak LV, Zvyagintsev DG (2002) The growth promoting effect of Beijerinckia mobilis and Clostridium sp. cultures on some agricultural crops. Microbiol 71(1):109–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Prasanna R, Babu S, Rana A, Kabi SR, Chaudhary V, Gupta V, Kumar A, Shivay YS, Nain L, Pal RK (2013a) Evaluating the establishment and agronomic proficiency of cyanobacterial consortia as organic options in wheat-rice cropping sequence. Exp Agric 49:416–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Prasanna R, Kumar A, Babu S, Chawla G, Chaudhary V, Singh S, Gupta V, Nain L, Saxena AK (2013b) Deciphering the biochemical spectrum of novel cyanobacterium based biofilms for use as inoculants. Biol Agric Hortic 29(3):145–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Prasanna R, Sharma E, Sharma P, Kumar A, Kumar R, Gupta V, Pal RK, Shivay YS, Nain L (2013c) Soil fertility and establishment potential of inoculated cyanobacteria in rice crop grown under non-flooded conditions. Paddy Water Environ 11:321–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Puente ME, Bashan Y, Li CY, Lebsky VK (2004) Microbial populations and activities in the rhizoplane of rock-weathering desert plants. Root colonization and weathering of igneous rocks. Plant Biol 6:629–642PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Ramadan EM, Abdel Hafez AA, Hassan EA, Saber FM (2016) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and their potential for biocontrol of phytopathogens. Afr J Microbiol Res 10:486–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Ramamoorthy V, Viswanathan R, Raguchandar J, Prakasham T, Samiyappan R (2001) Induction of systemic resistance by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in crop plants against pest and diseases. Crop Prot 20:1–11Google Scholar
  136. Reid A, Greene SE (2012) How microbes can help feed the world? Report of American Academy of Microbiology Colloquium, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  137. Rodriguez H, Fraga R, Gonzalez T, Bashan Y (2006) Genetics of phosphate solubilization and its potential applications for improving plant growth promoting bacteria. Plant Soil 287:15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Salimpour S, Khavazi K, Nadian H, Besharati H, Miransari M (2010) Enhancing phosphorous availability to canola (Brassica napus L.) using P solubilizing and sulfur oxidizing bacteria. Aus J Crop Sci 4(5):330–334Google Scholar
  139. Sandhya V, Ali SZ, Grover M, Reddy G, Venkateswarlu B (2010) Effect of plant growth promoting Pseudomonas spp. on compatible solutes, antioxidant status and plant growth of maize under drought stress. Plant Growth Regul 62:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Schulz B, Boyle C (2006) What are endophytes? In: Schulz BJE, Boyle CJC, Sieber TN (eds) Microbial root endophytes. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Sergeeva E, Liaimer A, Bergman B (2002) Evidence for production of the phytohormone indole-3- acetic acid by cyanobacteria. Planta 215:229–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Shahab S, Ahmed N, Khan NS (2009) Indole acetic acid production and enhanced plant growth promotion by indigenous PSBs. Afri J Agri Res 4:1312–1316Google Scholar
  143. Shaharoona B, Naveed M, Arshad M, Zahir A (2008) Fertilizer-dependent efficiency of Pseudomonads for improving growth, yield, and nutrient use efficiency of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 79:147–155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Singh HP, Sharma KL, Venkateswarulu B, Neelavani K (1999) Fertilizer use in rainfed areas: problems and potentials. Fert News 44:27–38Google Scholar
  145. Smith K, Handelsman J, Goodman RM (1999) Genetic basis in plants for interactions with disease-suppressive bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:4786–4790PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Srinivasarao C, Venkateswarlu B, Lal R, Singh AK, Kundu S, Vittal KPR, Balaguruvaiah G, Vijaya Shankar Babu M, Ravindra Chary G, Prasadbabu MBB, Reddy Y (2012a) Soil carbon sequestration and agronomic productivity of an Alfisol for a groundnut based system in a semi arid environment in South India. Eur J Agron 43:40–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Srinivasarao C, Venkateswarlu B, Lal R, Singh AK, Kundu S, Vittal KPR, Ramachandrappa BK, Gajanan GN (2012b) Long-term effects of crop residues and fertility management on carbon sequestration and agronomic productivity of groundnut–finger millet rotation on an Alfisol in southern India. Int J Agric Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2012.662392
  148. Srinivasarao C, Venkateswarlu B, Lal R, Singh AK, Kundu S, Vittal KPR, Sharma SK, Sharma RA, Jain MP, Ravindra Chary G (2012c) Sustaining agronomic productivity and quality of a Vertisolic Soil (Vertisol) under soybean-safflower cropping system in semi-arid central India. Can J Soil Sci 92(5):771–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Srinivasarao C, Venkateswarlu B, Lal R, Singh AK, Kundu S (2013a) Sustainable management of soils of dryland ecosystems of India for enhancing agronomic productivity and sequestering carbon. In: Sparks DL (ed) Advances in agronomy, vol 121. Academic, Burlington, pp 253–329Google Scholar
  150. Srinivasarao C, Venkateswarlu B, Lal R, Singh AK, Kundu S (2013b) Sustainable management of soils of dryland ecosystems of India for enhancing agronomic productivity and sequestering carbon. Adv Agron 121:254–329Google Scholar
  151. Srinivasarao C, Lal R, Prasad JVNS, Gopinath KA, Singh R, Jakkula VS, Sahrawat KL, Venkteswarulu B, Sikka AK, Virmani SM (2015) Potential and challenges in rainfed farming in India. Adv Agron 133:113–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Srinivasrao Ch, Ravindra Chary G, Venkateswarulu B, Vittal KPR, Prasad JVNS, Kundu S, Singh SR, Gajanan GN, Sharma RA, Patel JJ, Deshpande AN, Balaguravaiah G (2009) Carbon sequestration strategies in rainfed production systems of India, Central Research Institute for DRyland Agriculture, ICAR, Hyderabad-500059, India p 102Google Scholar
  153. Srivastava S, Yadav A, Seem K, Mishra S, Chaudhary V, Srivastava CS (2008) Effect of high temperature on Pseudomonas putida NBRI0987 biofilm formation and expression of stress sigma factor RpoS. Curr Microbiol 56:453–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Steenhoudt O, Vanderleyden J (2000) Azospirillum, a free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterium closely associated with grasses: genetic, biochemical and ecological aspects. FEMS Microbiol Rev 24:487–506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Strobel G, Daisy B, Castillo U, Harper J (2004) Natural products from endophytic microorganisms. J Nat Prod 67:257–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Strzelczyk E, Pokojska-Burdziej A (1984) Production of auxins and gibberellin-like substance by mycorrhizal fungi, bacteria and actinomycetes isolated from soil and the mycorrhizosphere of pine (Pinus silvestris L.) Plant Soil 81:185–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Tien TM, Gaskins MH, Hubbel DH (1979) Plant growth substances produced by Azospirillum brasilense and their effect on growth of pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L.) Appl Environ Microbiol 37:1016–1024PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  158. Timms-Wilson TM, Ellis RJ, Renwick A, Rhodes DJ, Mavrodi DV, Weller DM, Thomashow LS, Bailey MJ (2000) Chromosomal insertion of phenazine-1-carboxylic-acid biosynthetic pathway enhances efficacy of damping-off disease control by Pseudomonas fluorescens. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 13:1293–1300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Timmusk S, Wagner EGH (1999) The plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Paenibacillus polymyxa induces changes in Arabidopsis thaliana gene expression: a possible connection between biotic and abiotic stress responses. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 12:951–959PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Timmusk S, Nicander B, Granhall U, Tillberg E (1999) Cytokinin production by Paenibacillus polymyxa. Soil Biol Biochem 31(13):1847–1852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Timmusk S, Abd El-Daim IA, Copolovici L, Tanilas T, Kannaste A, Behers L, Niinemets U (2014) Drought-tolerance of wheat improved by rhizosphere bacteria from harsh environments: enhanced biomass production and reduced emissions of stress volatiles. PLoS One 9:e96086PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Turan MA, Gulluce MB, Cakmakci RC, Oztas TA, Sahin FD (2010) The effect of PGPR strain on wheat yield and quality parameters. 19th World Congress of soil science, soil solutions for a changing world 1–6 August 2010, Brisbane, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  163. Van Loon LC (1997) Induced resistance in plants and the role of pathogenesis related proteins. Eur J Plant Pathol 103:753–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Van Loon LC, Bakker PAHM, Pieterse CMJ (1998) Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 36:453–483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Vig AC, Singh NT (1983) Yield and P uptake by wheat as affected by P fertilization and soil moisture regime. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 4:21–29Google Scholar
  166. Wakelin S, Warren R, Harvey P, Ryder M (2004) Phosphate solubilization by Penicillium spp. closely associated with wheat roots. Bio Fertil Soils 40:36–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. Welbaum GE, Sturz AV, Dong ZM, Nowak J (2004) Managing soil microorganisms to improve productivity of agro-ecosystems. Crit Rev Plant Sci 23:175–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Wu J, Baldwin I (2009) Herbivory-induced signalling in plants: perception and action. Plant Cell Environ 32:1161–1174Google Scholar
  169. Xiong L, Zhu JK (2002) Salt tolerance. In: Somerville C, Meyerowitz E (eds) The Arabidopsis book. American Society of Plant Biologists, Rockville, pp 1–22Google Scholar
  170. Xinxian L, Xuemei C, Yagang C, Woon-Chung W, Zebin W, Qitang W (2011) Isolation and characterization endophytic bacteria from hyperaccumulator Sedum alfredii Hance and their potential to promote phytoextraction of zinc polluted soil. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 27:1197–1207Google Scholar
  171. Yang CJ, Zhang XG, Shi GY, Zhao HY, Chen L, Tao K, Hou TP (2011) Isolation and identification of endophytic bacterium W4 against tomato Botrytis cinerea and antagonistic activity stability. Afr J Microbiol Res 5(2):131–136Google Scholar
  172. Zabihi HR, Savaghebi GR, Khavazi K, Ganjali A, Miransari M (2011) Pseudomonas bacteria and phosphorous fertilization, affecting wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield and P uptake under greenhouse and field conditions. Acta Physiol Plant 33:145–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. Zakharychev VV (1999) Phytohormones, their analogues and antagonists as herbicides and regulators of plant growth, RKhTU im, MoscowGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland AgricultureHyderabadIndia
  2. 2.ICAR-National Academy of Agriculture Research ManagementHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations