Abstract
The fifth relational extension is: “[building from the first four extensions] there is a productive—rather than merely critical—space to theorize organizing activity.” This does not imply that the relational research program advances without critiquing. Through the engagement with the underlying generative principles of scholarship, as outlined in the previous four chapters, the program is concerned with advancing knowledge claims in relation to alternate positions. In this chapter, I argue that parallel monologues—a failure to engage with alternate positions—are a major issue in educational administration scholarship. My argument concerns the ontological insecurity of educational administration (particularly “leadership”), and I offer the relational program as a basis for a social epistemology for educational administration, one that offers a productive space to theorize.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bachelard, G. (1984[1934]). The new scientific spirit (P. A. Heelan, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press. [Originally published as Le nouvel esprit scientique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France].
Baron, G., & Taylor, W. (Eds.). (1969). Educational administration and the social sciences. London: The Athlone Press.
Bates, R. J. (1980). Educational administration, the sociology of science, and the management of knowledge. Educational Administration Quarterly, 16(2), 1–20.
Bates, R. J. (2010). History of educational leadership and management. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGraw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 724–730). Oxford: Elsevier.
Berger, P. (1966). Invitation to sociology: A humanistic perspective. Harmondsworth: Pelican.
Blackmore, J. (1999). Troubling women: Feminism, leadership and educational change. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Blackmore, J. (2010). Disrupting notions of leadership from feminist post-colonial positions. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 13(1), 1–6.
Boyan, N. J. (Ed.). (1988). Handbook of research on educational administration. New York, NY: Longman.
Burgess, D., & Newton, P. (Eds.). (2015). Educational administration and leadership: Theoretical foudnations. New York, NY: Routledge.
Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life. London: Heinemann.
Bush, T. (2017). The rise and rise of leadership. In G. Lakomski, S. Eacott, & Evers, C. W. (Eds.), Questioning leadership: New directions for educational organizations (pp. 58–69). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Campbell, R. F. (1979). Fifteenth anniversary perspective: A critique of the educational administration quarterly. Educational Administration Quarterly, 15(3), 1–19.
Campbell, R. F., & Newell, L. J. (1973). A study of professors of educational administration. Columbus, OH: University Council for Educational Administration.
Cherkowski, S., Currie, R., & Hilton, S. (2012). Who should rank our journals … and based on what? Journal of Educational Administration, 50(2), 206–230.
Coladarci, A., & Getzels, J. W. (1955). The use of theory in educational administration. Palo Atlo, CA: Stanford University Press.
Crevani, L., Lindgren, M., & Packendorff, J. (2010). Leadership, not leaders: On the study of leadership as practice and interactions. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26(1), 77–86.
Culbertson, J. A. (1988). A century’s quest for a knowledge base. In N. J. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 3–26). New York, NY: Longman.
Denis, J. L., Langley, A., & Rouleau, L. (2010). The practice of leadership in the messy world of organizations. Leadership, 6(1), 67–88.
Dewey, J. (1902). The educational situation. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Donmoyer, R. (2001). Evers and Lakomski’s search for leadership’s holy grail (and the intriguing ideas they encountered along the way). Journal of Educational Administration, 39(6), 554–572.
Drath, W. H., et al. (2008). Direction, alignment, commitment: Toward a more integrative ontology of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(6), 635–653.
Durkheim, E. (1982). The rules of sociological method (W. D. Halls, Trans.). New York, NY: Free Press. [Originally published as Les régles de la méthode sociologique (Paris: F. Alcan)].
Eacott, S. (2009). A review of Australian publications in educational leadership journals. Leading & Managing, 15(1), 14–28.
Eacott, S. (2013). Rethinking “leadership” in education: A research agenda. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 45(2), 113–125.
Eacott, S. (2014). The changing nature of Australian educational leadership research publications. Leading & Managing, 20(1), 93–105.
Eacott, S. (2015). Educational leadership relationally: A theory and methodology for educational leadership, management and administration. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
Eacott, S. (2016). Fluctuations in value: The shifting worth of journal articles in educational administration. Critical Studies in Education.
English, F. W. (2001). What paradigm shift? An interrogation of Kuhn’s idea of normalcy in the research practice of educational administration. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4(1), 29–38.
English, F. W. (2003). The postmodern challenge to the practice of educational administration. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
English, F. W. (2006). The unintended consequences of a standardized knowledge base in advancing educational leadership preparation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(3), 461–472.
English, F. W. (Ed.). (2011). The SAGE handbook of educational leadership: Advances in theory, research and practice (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Evers, C. W., & Lakomski, G. (1991). Knowing educational administration: Contemporary methodological controversies in educational research. London: Pergamon Press.
Evers, C. W., & Lakomski, G. (1996). Exploring educational administration. Oxford: Elsevier.
Ewing, J. L. (1975). The first five years: A progress report on the CCEA. Journal of Educational Administration, 13(1), 70–76.
Fitz, J. (1999). Reflections on the field of educational management studies. Educational Management and Administration, 27(3), 313–321.
Fitzgerald, T., & Gunter, H. M. (2008). Educational administration and history part 2: Academic journals and the contribution of JEAH. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 40(1), 23–40.
Greenfield, T. B. (1973). Organizations as social inventions. Paper presented at the 58th Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Greenfield, T. B. (1974). Theory in the study of organizations and administrative structures: A new perspective. Paper presented at the Third International Intervisitation Program on Educational Administration, Bristol, England.
Greenfield, T. B., & Ribbins, P. (Eds.). (1993). Greenfield on educational administration: Towards a humane science. London: Routledge.
Griffiths, D. E. (1985). Administrative theory in transition. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.
Griffiths, D. E. (1988). Administrative theory. In N. J. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 7–51). New York, NY: Longman.
Griffiths, D. E. (1997). The case for theoretical pluralism. Educational Management and Administration, 25(4), 371–380.
Gronn, P. (1982). Neo-Taylorism in educational administration? Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(4), 17–35.
Gronn, P. (1984). On studying administrators at work. Educational Administration Quarterly, 20(1), 115–129.
Gronn, P. (1987). Obituary for structured observation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 23(2), 78–81.
Gronn, P. (2008). The state of Denmark. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 40(2), 173–185.
Gronn, P. (2017). Silos, bunkers, and their voices. In G. Lakomski, S. Eacott, & C. W. Evers (Eds.), Questioning leadership: New directions for educational organizations (pp. 192–201). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Gunter, H. M. (2000). Thinking theory: The field of educational management in England and Wales. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(4), 623–635.
Gunter, H. M. (2001). Critical approaches to leadership in education. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 2(2), 94–108.
Gunter, H. M. (2002). Purposes and positions in the field of educational management. Educational Management and Administration, 30(1), 7–26.
Gunter, H. M. (2010). A sociological approach to educational leadership. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(4), 519–527.
Gunter, H. M. (2013). Researching and conceptualizing the field. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 45(2), 201–212.
Gunter, H. M. (2016). An intellectual history of school leadership practice and research. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Gunter, H. M., & Ribbins, P. (2002). Leadership studies in education: Towards a map of the field. Educational Management and Administration, 30(4), 387–416.
Haas, E., et al. (2007). Assessing influence on the field. An analysis of citations to Educational Administration Quarterly, 1979–2003. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(4), 494–512.
Hage, J. (1980). Theories of organization: Form, process, and transformation. New York, NY: Wiley.
Haller, E. J. (1968). The interdisciplinary ideology in educational administration: Some preliminary notes on the sociology of knowledge. Educational Administration Quarterly, 4(1), 61–77.
Hallinger, P. (2013). A conceptual framework for systematic reviews of research in educational leadership and management. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 126–149.
Hallinger, P., & Bryant, D. A. (2013a). Mapping the terrain of research on educational leadership and management in East Asia. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(5), 618–637.
Hallinger, P., & Bryant, D. A. (2013b). Review of research publications on educational leadership and management in Asia: A comparative analysis of three regions. Oxford Review of Education, 39(3), 307–328.
Hayes, D. K. (1966). The national conference of professors of educational administration: A stimulator and forum for professors. Journal of Educational Administration, 4(1), 3–11.
Hills, J. (1978). Problems in the production and utilization of knowledge in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 14(1), 1–12.
Immegart, G. L. (1990). What is truly missing in advanced preparation in educational administration? Journal of Educational Administration, 28(3), 5–13.
Kelly, S. (2014). Towards a negative ontology of leadership. Human Relations, 67(8), 905–922.
Kmetz, J. T., & Willower, D. J. (1982). Elementary school principals’ work behavior. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(4), 62–78.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lakomski, G. (2005). Managing without leadership: Towards a theory of organizational functioning. Oxford: Elsevier.
Lakomski, G., Eacott, S., & Evers, C. W. (Eds.). (2017). Questioning leadership: New directions for educational organizations. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Locke, K., & Golden-Biddle, K. (1997). Constructing opportunities for contribution: Structuring intertextual coherence and ‘problematizing’ in organizational studies. The Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 1023–1062.
Martin, W. J., & Willower, D. J. (1981). The managerial behavior of high school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 17(1), 69–90.
Maxcy, S. J. (1993). Postmodern school leadership: Meeting the crisis in educational administration. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Mayo, R. C., Zirkel, P. A., & Finger, B. A. (2006). Which journals are educational leadership professionals choosing? Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(5), 806–811.
McCarthy, M. M., & Kuh, G. D. (1997). Continuity and change: The educational leadership professoriate. Tempe, AZ: University Council for Educational Administration.
Mulford, B. (2007). Overview of research on Australian educational leadership 2001–2005 (Vol. 40). Sydney: Australian Council for Educational Leaders.
Murphy, J., & Louis, K. S. (Eds.). (1999). Handbook of research on educational administration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Niesche, R. (2011). Foucault and educational leadership: Disciplining the principal. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Niesche, R. (2014). Deconstructing educational leadership: Derrida and Lyotard. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Oplatka, I. (2009). The field of educational administration: A historical overview of scholarly attempts to recognize epistemological identities, meanings and boundaries from the 1960s onwards. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(1), 8–35.
Oplatka, I. (2010). The legacy of educational administration: A historical analysis of an academic field. Berlin: Peter Lang.
Oplatka, I. (2012). Fifty years of publication: Pondering the legacies of the Journal of Educational Administration. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(1), 34–56.
Park, S. H. (2001). Epistemological underpinnings of theory developments in educational administration. Australian Journal of Education, 45(3), 237–248.
Pounder, D. G., & Johnson, B. (2007). Reflections on EAQs past, present, and future. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(2), 259–272.
Ribbins, P., & Gunter, H. M. (2002). Mapping leadership studies in education: Towards a typology of knowledge domains. Educational Management and Administration, 30(4), 359–385.
Richardson, J. W., & McLeod, S. (2009). Where should educational leadership authors publish to get noticed by the top journals in the discipline? Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(3), 631–639.
Riffel, J. A. (1986). The study of educational administration: A developmental point of view. Journal of Educational Administration, 24(2), 152–172.
Rodríguez-Ruiz, Ó. (2009). The citation indexes and the quantification of knowledge. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(2), 250–266.
Rowan, B., & Miskel, C. G. (1999). Institutional theory and the study of educational organizations. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 359–383). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Samier, E. (2006). Educational administration as a historical discipline: An apologia pro vita historia. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 38(2), 125–139.
Samier, E. (2013). Where have the disruptions fone? Educational administration’s theoretical capacity for analyzing or fomenting disruption. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 16(2), 234–244.
Samier, E. (Ed.). (2016). Ideologies and educational leadership. London: Routledge.
Scott, W. R. (1981). Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Smyth, J. (2008). Australia’s great disengagement with public education and social justice in educational leadership. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 40(3), 221–233.
Taylor, W. (1969). Issues and problems in training the school administrator. In G. Baron & W. Taylor (Eds.), Educational administration and the social sciences (pp. 97–123). London: Athlone Press.
Thomas, A. R. (1971). Commonwealth Council for Educational Administration: A new centre for educational leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 9(2), 128–134.
Thomas, A. R. (1986). Seeing isn’t believing? Neither is hearing? In defense of observational studies. Educational Administration Quarterly, 22(1), 29–48.
Thomas, A. R. (2010). Educational leadership as a field of study: Professional journals, 1994–2006. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGraw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (pp. 731–739). Oxford: Elsevier.
Thomas, A. R., Willis, Q., & Phillipps, D. (1981). Observational studies of Australian school administrators: Methodological issues. Australian Journal of Education, 25(1), 55–72.
Thomson, P. (2001). How principals lose ‘face’: A disciplinary tale of educational administration and modern managerialism. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 22(1), 5–22.
Thrupp, M., & Willmott, R. (2003). Educational management in managerialist times: Beyond the textual apologists. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Tschannen-Moran, M., Firestone, W. A., Hoy, W. K., & Moore Johnson, S. (2000). The write stuff: A study of productive scholars in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(3), 358–390.
Tyack, D., & Hansot, E. (1982). Managers of virtue: Public school leadership in America, 1820–1980. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Waite, D. (1998). Editorial: On the occasion of the inaugural issue of the International Journal of Leadership in Education. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1(1), 91–93.
Waite, D. (2002). “The paradigm wars” in educational administration: An attempt at transcendence. International Studies in Educational Administration, 30(1), 66–81.
Waite, D., & Bogotch, I. (Eds.). (2017). The Wiley international handbook of educational leadership. Malden, MA: Wiley.
Walker, W. G. (1976). Foreword. International Review of Education, 22(4), 421–428.
Walton, J. (1955). The theoretical study of educational administration. The Harvard Educational Review, 25(3), 169–178.
Wang, Y., & Bowers, A. J. (2016). Mapping the field of educational administration research: A journal citation network analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(3), 242–269.
Wang, Y., Bowers, A. J., & Fikis, D. J. (2017). Automated text data mining analysis of five decades of educational leadership research literature. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(2), 289–323.
Wilkinson, J., & Eacott, S. (2013). Outsiders within? Deconstructing the educational administration scholar. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 16(2), 191–204.
Willower, D. J. (1981). Educational administration: Some philosophical and other considerations. Journal of Educational Administration, 19(2), 115–139.
Willower, D. J. (1983). Analogies gone awry: Replies to Hills and Gronn. Educational Administration Quarterly, 19(1), 35–47.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eacott, S. (2018). Productive Thinking. In: Beyond Leadership. Educational Leadership Theory. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6568-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6568-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6567-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6568-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)