Advertisement

Evaluating Dynamic, Regional, and Economic Impacts of the Tokai Earthquake

  • Hiroyuki ShibusawaEmail author
Chapter
  • 301 Downloads
Part of the New Frontiers in Regional Science: Asian Perspectives book series (NFRSASIPER, volume 11)

Abstract

Natural disasters result in economic losses. In this study, a dynamic spatial computable general equilibrium model is constructed to investigate the negative economic impacts of an earthquake. In our model, Japan is subdivided into 47 regions, which are all connected by transportation networks. The model is of a decentralized economy with utility-maximizing consumers and value-maximizing firms in a dynamic context. The model embodies both spatial and dynamic aspects, i.e., commodity flows among regions and the dynamics of regional investments. The model is calibrated for the 47 regions’ economies using a multi-regional input–output table for Japan. We estimate the impacts of a hypothetical earthquake, which is expected to occur in the near future, on the regional economy (taking the Tokai region of Japan as a case study). The simulation results show both dynamic and spatial economic impacts before and after an earthquake. This study suggests that the economic impacts of such a disaster should be evaluated based on both ex-ante and ex-post criteria.

Keywords

Disaster protection Indirect economic impacts Tokai earthquake Dynamic spatial CGE modeling 

Notes

Acknowledgement

I would like to thank Y. Miyata for collaboration to the early stage of this work. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 16 K13141. This is also supported by Joint Usage and Research Center, Research Center for San-En-Nanshin Regional Collaboration, Aichi University.

References

  1. Abel AB, Blanchard OJ (1983) An inter temporal model of saving and investment. Econometrica 51:675–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ando M (1975) Possibility of a major earthquake in the Tokai District, Japan and its pre-estimated Seismotectonic effects. Tectonophysics 25:9–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borglin A (2004) Economic dynamics and general equilibrium. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bröckera J, Korzhenevych A (2013) Forward looking dynamics in spatial CGE modeling. Econ Model 31:389–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Central Disaster Prevention Council (2003) Estimated damages from the Tokai Earthquake. Cabinet office in Japan 1–18 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  6. Ciesecke J (2002) Explaining regional economic performance: an historical application of a dynamic multi-regional CGE model. Pap Reg Sci 81:247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ciesecke J (2003) Targeting regional output with state government fiscal instruments: a dynamic multi-regional CGE analysis. Aust Econ Pap 42:214–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dixit PB, Jorgenson DW (2013) Handbook of computable general equilibrium modelling, vol 1A and 1B. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  9. Donaghy KP (2009) CGE modeling in space. In: Capello R, Nijkamp P (eds) Regional dynamics and growth, advances in regional economics. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 731–799Google Scholar
  10. Ellson RW, Milliman RJ, Roberts RB (1984) Measuring the regional economic effects of earthquakes and earthquake perditions. J Reg Sci 24:559–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hitomi K and Bunditsakulchai P (2008) Development of multi-regional input output table for 47 Prefectures in Japan. Socio-Economic Research Center, Rep. No. Y07035, CRIEPI (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  12. Kehoe TJ, Srinivasan TN, Whalley J (2005) Frontiers in Applied General Equilibrium Modeling. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koike A and Ueda T (2005) Economic damage assessment of catastrophe by using spatial general computable general equilibrium analysis. Proceedings of the 19th Pacific Regional Science ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  14. McGregor PG, Swales K, Yin YP (1995) Migration equilibria in regional economies: a multi-period CGE analysis of an improvement in local amenities. In: CJM J, den Bergh V, Nijkamp P, Rietveld P (eds) Recent advances in spatial equilibrium modeling: methodology and applications. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  15. McKibbin W and Wilcoxen P GCUBED (1992) A dynamic multi-sector general equilibrium growth model of the global economy. Brookings Discussion Papers in International Economics, No. 97Google Scholar
  16. Mogi K (1970) Recent horizontal deformation of the earth’s crust and tectonic activity in Japan (1). Bull Earth Res Inst, Tokyo Univ 48:413–430Google Scholar
  17. Mogi K (1985) Temporal variation of crustal deformation during the days preceding a thrust-type great earthquake – the 1944 Tonankai earthquake of magnitude 8.1, Japan. PAGEOPH 122:765–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Okuyama Y, Chang SE (2004) Modeling spatial and economic impacts of disasters. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Oosterhaven J, Knaap T (2003) Spatial economic impacts of transport infrastructure investments, transport projects, Programmes and policies. In: Pearman A, Mackie P, Nellthorp J (eds) Evaluation needs and capabilities. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 87–110Google Scholar
  20. Rose A, Liao S (2005) Modeling regional economic resilience to disasters: a computable general equilibrium analysis of water service distributions. J Reg Sci 45(1):75–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rose A, Benavides J, Chang S, Szczesniak P, Lim D (1997) The regional economic impact of an earthquake: direct and indirect effects of electricity lifeline disruptions. J Reg Sci 37(3):437–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sato H (1970) Crustal movements associated with the 1994 Tonankai earthquake. J Geodetic Soc Japan 15:177–180. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  23. Shibusawa H, Miyata Y (2011) Evaluating the dynamic and spatial economic impacts of an earthquake: a CGE application to Japan. Reg Sci Inq 3(2):13–25Google Scholar
  24. Shibusawa H, Yamaguchi M, Miyata Y (2009) Evaluating the impacts of a disaster in the Tokai region of Japan: a dynamic spatial CGE model approach. Stud Reg Sci 39:539–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shoven J, Whalley J (1992) Applying general equilibrium. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Sohn J, Kim TJ, Hewings JD, Lee JS, Jang SG (2003) Retrofit priority of transport network links under an earthquake. J Urban Plann Dev 129(4):195–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Taniguchi H (2007) An risk evaluation of economic damage loss caused by earthquake in large cities. Annual meeting of Japanese Association for Applied Economics. Chuo University, Tokyo, pp 1–12. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  28. Tatano H, Tsuchiya S (2008) A framework for economic loss estimation due to seismic transportation network disruption: a spatial computable general equilibrium approach. Nat Hazards 44:253–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Toyoda T, Kochi A (1997) Hanshin-Awaji Daishinsai ni yoru sangyo higai no suikei [estimation of economic damages in the industrial sector by the great Hanshin-Awaji earthquake]. J Econ Bus Adm 176(2):1–15. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  30. Tsuchiya S, Tatano H, Okada N (2003) Transport-related economic losses with the Tokai earthquake warning declaration by a spatial computable general equilibrium approach. J Soc Saf Sci 5:319–325. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  31. World Bank and United Nations (2010) Natural hazards, unnatural disasters: the economics of effective prevention, World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  32. Xie W, Li N, Wu J-D, Hao X-L (2014) Modeling the economic costs of disasters and recovery: analysis using a dynamic computable general equilibrium model. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 14:757–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Toyohashi University of TechnologyToyohashiJapan

Personalised recommendations