Digital Participation Among Children in Rural Areas

  • Carin RoosEmail author
  • Christina Olin-SchellerEmail author
Part of the International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development book series (CHILD, volume 22)


This chapter problematizes the experience of digital participation and growing up in rural areas. The chapter modifies the relatively uniform picture of children as digital natives. It describes how children in different ways use, and refrain from using, digital tools and how these practices relate to inclusion and exclusion in peer relations. The study takes an ethnographic approach by employing observations, interviews and visual methods. Data collection was carried out over 2 years in a school (preschool to grade 6) in a rural area in Sweden. The participants were qualified educators other staff, and their students aged 1–12 and parents. In this chapter we use a sub-corpus of data consisting of 31 interviews with children (aged 7–12) and 2 with parents. The study shows that few of the children can be described as digital natives, while the majority relegated digital tools and the Internet to the periphery across settings. There were important differences between children with high and low social activity. Children with low social activity and few friends outside the family seldom used digital tools or rarely used them for interaction, although they developed alternative means of communication. This finding suggests implications for these children’s chances to develop digital inclusion, learning opportunities and – by extension – their opportunities to be involved in community development. The rural community in which they lived can be described as a subculture in which children can feel safe and be protected from, as the adults expressed it, the digitalized, unsafe world.


  1. Ainscow, M., Dyson, A., Goldrick, S., & West, M. (2012). Making schools effective for all: Rethinking the task. School Leadership & Management, 32(3), 197–2013. Scholar
  2. Andersson, M., & Jansson, A. (2012). Landsbygdens globalisering: Medier, identitet och social förändring i nätverkssamhällets marginaler [Rural globalisation: Media, identity and social change in the periphery of network society]. Göteborg: Daidalos.Google Scholar
  3. Besser, H. (2001). The next digital divides. The Digital Divide Spring 2001, 1(2), 1–4. Retrieved from Scholar
  4. Casey, L., Bruce, B. C., Martin, A., Hallissy, M., Reynolds, A., Brown, C., & Coffey, L. (2009). Digital literacy: New approaches to participation and inquiry learning to foster literacy skills among primary school children. Dublin: Centre for Research and Innovation in Learning and Teaching, National College of Ireland.Google Scholar
  5. Cremin, H., Mason, C., & Busher, H. (2011). Problematising pupil voice using visual methods: Findings from a study of engaged and disaffected pupils in an urban secondary school. British Educational Research Journal, 37(4), 585–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Drotner, K. (1992). Modernity and media panics. In M. Skovmand & K. Schröder (Eds.), Media cultures. Reappraising transnational media (pp. 42–62). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Drotner, K. (1999). Dangerous media? Panic discourses and dilemmas of modernity. Pedagogica Historica, 35(3), 593–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Drotner, K., & Kobbernagel, C. (2014). Toppling hierarchies? Media and information literacies, ethnicity, and performative media practices. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(4), 409–428. Scholar
  9. Drotner, K., Brun Jensen, K., Poulsen, I., & Schröder, K. (1996). Medier och kultur: En grundbok i medieanalys och medieteori. [Media and culture: A book on media analysis and media theory]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  10. Harper, D. (1986). Meaning and work. A study in photo elicitation. International Journal of Visual Sociology, 2(2), 20–43.Google Scholar
  11. Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Helsper, E. J. (2010). Gendered internet use across generations and life stages. Communication Research, 37(3), 352–374. Scholar
  13. Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: Where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503–520. Scholar
  14. Jenkins, H. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Retrieved from:
  15. Koster, M., Nakken, H., JanPijl, S., & van Houten, E. (2009). Being part of the peer group: A literature study focusing on the social dimension of inclusion in education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 13(2), 117–140. Scholar
  16. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2008). Digital literacies – Concepts, policies and practices. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  17. Lapenta, F. (2011). Some theoretical methodological views on photo-elicitation. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels (Eds.), The Sage handbook of visual research methods (pp. 201–213). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lim, S. S. (2013). On mobile communication and youth “deviance”: Beyond moral, media and mobile panics. Mobile Media & Communication, 1(1), 96–101. doi:
  20. McIntyre, D., Pedder, D., & Rudduck, J. (2005). Pupil voice: Comfortable and uncomfortable learnings for teachers. Research Papers in Education, 20(2), 149–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Olin-Scheller, C., & Roos, C. (2015). Barn och barndom i nätskugga. [Children and childhood in the shadow of the internet]. Nordic Studies in Education, 35(1), 37–50.Google Scholar
  22. Olin-Scheller, C., & Tanner, M. (2015). Street smart i klassrummet? Högstadielevers användning av smarta telefoner i undervisningens mellanrum. [Street smart in the classroom? Upper secondary school students’ uses of smart phones in the gaps of teaching] KAPET, Karlstads universitets Pedagogiska Tidskrift, 11(1), 23–44.Google Scholar
  23. Piškur, B., Danïels, R., Jongmans, M. J., Ketelaar, M., Smeets, R., Norton, M., & Beurskens, A. (2014). Participation and social participation: Are they distinct concepts? Clinical Rehabilition, 28(3), 211–220.
  24. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Richard, V. M., & Lahman, M. K. E. (2015). Photo-eliciting: Reflexivity on methods, analysis, and graphic protraits. International Journal of Research & Methods in Education, 38(1), 3–22. Scholar
  26. Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Skolverket. (2000). Utbildningsvillkor i glesbygd [Educational conditions in rural environments]. Stockholm: Skolverket.Google Scholar
  28. Smahel, D., Helsper, E. J., Barbovschi, M., & Dedkova, L. (2012) Meeting online strangers among European children. Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Developmental Psychology (pp. 419–422). Bologna, Italy.Google Scholar
  29. Tapscott, D. (1996). The digital economy: Promise and peril in the age of networked intelligence. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  30. Trondman, M. (1999). Kultursociologi i praktiken [Cultural Sociology in practice]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  31. Trondman M. (2003). Unga vuxna: Kulturmönster och livschanser: En empirisk översikt [e-book] [Young adults: Culture and life conditions]. Växjö: Växjö University.Google Scholar
  32. van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Society and discourse: How social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. van Dijk, T. A., & Hacker, K. (2003). The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. The Information Society, 19(4), 315–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Weiner, G., & Öhrn, E. (2009). En talande tystnad: Om frånvaro och närvaro i forskning om utbildning och kön.[Talking silence: About absence and presence in research on education and gender]. In I. Wernersson (Ed.), Genus i förskola och skola: förändringar i policy, perspektiv och praktik [Gender in preschool and school: Changes in policy, perspective and practice] (pp. 157–170). Göteborg: Göteborgs Universitet.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Karlstad UniversityKarlstadSweden

Personalised recommendations