Skip to main content

Learning Theory and Experiments in Neuroeconomics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Behavioral Economics

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Business and Economics ((STBE))

  • 3030 Accesses

Abstract

Learning is an important factor in decision making under a novel or unstable environment. Reinforcement learning theory is a promising framework as a computational model of the brain in the process of the decision making in humans and animals. The hypothesis of dopamine in learning signals has been established by a huge amount of experimental evidence in animal neurophysiology and human imaging studies. The quest for the detailed neural mechanism of decision making is the first step to develop an economic theory that can explain real human behavior including individual preference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For Bayesian learning (also called rational learning) in economics, see, e.g., a survey paper by Evans and Honkapohja (1999).

  2. 2.

    The technical term is “Markovian decision problem.”.

References

  • Chikama, M., McFarland, N. R., Amaral, D. G., & Haber, S. N. (1997). Insular cortical projections to functional regions of the striatum correlate with cortical cytoarchitectonic organization in the primate. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 17(24), 9686–9705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. W., & Honkapohja, S. (1999). Learning dynamics. In Taylor, J. B., & Woodford, M (Eds.), Handbook of macroeconomics, Volume 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glimcher, P. W., & Fehr, E. (2013). Neuroeconomics decision making and the brain (2nd ed.). Amsterdam; Boston: Elsevier/Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClure, S. M., Berns, G. S., & Montague, P. R. (2003). Temporal prediction errors in a passive learning task activate human striatum. Neuron, 38, 339–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Doherty, J. P., Dayan, P., Friston, K., Critchley, H., & Dolan, R. J. (2003). Temporal difference models and reward-related learning in the human brain. Neuron, 38(2), 329–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, W., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (1997). A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science, 275(5306), 1593–1599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. Cambridge, Massachusetts: B.F. Skinner Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998). Reinforcement learning. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, S. C., Doya, K., Okada, G., Ueda, K., Okamoto, Y., & Yamawaki, S. (2004). Prediction of immediate and future rewards differentially recruits cortico-basal ganglia loops. Nature Neuroscience, 7(8), 887–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence; experimental studies. New York: The Macmillan Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masao Ogaki .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ogaki, M., Tanaka, S.C. (2017). Learning Theory and Experiments in Neuroeconomics. In: Behavioral Economics. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6439-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6439-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6438-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6439-5

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics