Advertisement

Selection and Performance of Self-Help Groups in West Bengal: A Case Study

Chapter
Part of the India Studies in Business and Economics book series (ISBE)

Abstract

Our country is experimenting with Self-Help Groups for over 20 years. After the NABARD, panchayats started experimentation with self-help groups in their own way since l999. Swarojgar Yojana, world’s greatest credit-based poverty alleviation scheme relying on self-help was first announced in 1997 to glorify 50 years of independence. Swarnajayanti Gram Swarojgar Yojana (SGSY), microcredit-based scheme, came into effect from April, 1999. This scheme was planned to promote group loans, encourage small-scale savings and group enterprises to develop agency in some predetermined stages. The District cells and the panchayats worked in cooperation with the local level banks to organize the groups and implement the programme at the local level. Many studies have tried to investigate the progress of the self-help groups and their impact on rural livelihood and female empowerment during the last decade. In our micro-level study, we shall try to probe into the factors which play key role in involving the rural households with the self-help groups. The chapter tried to find out the determinants of association with these groups in two different districts at the village panchayat level on the basis of primary survey. Our findings suggest that not only economic factors but social and political factors play an important role in determining association of rural households to the SGSY programme.

Keywords

SGSY SHGs Beneficiary Panchayats Political Social 

References

  1. Alsop, R., Krishna, A., & Sjoblom, D. (2000). Are gram panchayats inclusive? Report of a study conducted in Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh. Background Paper No. 3 of the World Bank’s unpublished Overview of Rural Decentralization in India. 3, World Bank.Google Scholar
  2. Bagchee, S. (1987). Poverty alleviation programmes in seventh plan: an appraisal. Economic and Political Weekly, 22(4), 139–148.Google Scholar
  3. Bardhan, P., & Mookherjee, D. (2004). Poverty alleviation efforts of West Bengal panchayats. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(9), 965–974.Google Scholar
  4. Behar, A. (2003). Madhya Pradesh: Experiment with direct democracy, time for reappraisal. Economic and Political Weekly, 38(20), 1927–1929.Google Scholar
  5. Dutrey, A. P. (2007). Successful targeting? Reporting efficiency and costs in targeted poverty alleviation programmes. Social Policy and Development Programme Paper Number 35, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, November 2007.Google Scholar
  6. Ghatak, M., & Ghatak, M. (2002). Recent reforms in the panchayat system in West Bengal towards greater participatory governanace? Economic and Political Weekly, 37(1), 45–57.Google Scholar
  7. Kaladhar, K. (1997). Microfinance in India: Design, structure and governance. Economic and Political weekly, 32(42), 2687–2706.Google Scholar
  8. Khandelwal, A. K. (2007). Microfinance development strategy for India. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(13), 1127–1135.Google Scholar
  9. Kurian, N. J. (1987). Anti-poverty programme: A reappraisal. Economic and Political Weekly, 24(12), A13–A20.Google Scholar
  10. Nambiar, M. (2001). Making the gram sabha work. Economic and Political Weekly, 36(33), 3114–3117.Google Scholar
  11. Rath, N. (1985). Garibi hatao: Can IRDP do it? Economic and Political Weekly, 20(6), 238–246.Google Scholar
  12. Roy, D. (2007). Mid-term evaluation of the composition and working of Swarnajayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana in 24 Parganas South District (West Bengal), study supported by Planning Commission, Government of India.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of KalyaniKalyaniIndia
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsHaldia Government CollegeHaldiaIndia

Personalised recommendations