Dynamics of Forest Resources: Some Empirical Testing on Assam’s Forest Cover

  • Gunjan Kumar
Part of the India Studies in Business and Economics book series (ISBE)


Unlike exhaustible resources, forest is one of the renewable resources having regeneration capacity. However the environmental effects of the deforestation as a consequence of rising consumption and economic growth is not ignorable. Therefore, it is essential to understand the dynamic behaviour of forest cover for their conservation and sustainable forest management. This chapter uses Pontryagin’s maximum principle to formulate the optimal control path of forests. Mathematical softwares like MATLAB and Mathematica have been used to depict the behavioural trend of forests. Some empirical testing and calculations have been made by using the data of Assam’s forest cover for illustrative purpose. However the outcomes are constrained by data availability. The chapter finds that any slight change in the stock leads to a change in the whole behaviour of the forest cover over time and there is a specific rate of regeneration and specific consumption/harvest rate for every quantity of stock, which may keep the stock of forests constant. A small decline in regeneration and a small increase in consumption may lead to notable deforestation. Impatience (discounting the future utility with higher rates) in planning may result lesser consumption and lower stock in future. Extraction of the rents from the renewable resources should be equal to the natural rate of growth of the resources and these rents should be invested in their regeneration wherever possible.


Forests Harvesting Stock Regeneration 


  1. Arrow, K., Bolin, B., Costanza, R., Dasgupta, P., Folke, C., Holling, C. S., Jansson, B. O., Levin, S., Mäler, K. S., Perrings, C., & Pimentel, D. (1995). Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Ecological Economics, 15(2), 91–95.Google Scholar
  2. Asheim, G. B. (2011). Hartwick’s rule. Department of economics, University of Oslo. Retrieved from: Accessed 4 April 2014.
  3. Bretschger, L., & Smulders, S. (2007). Sustainable resource use and economic dynamics. Environmental & Resource Economics, 36(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s10640-006-9043-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Department of environment and forests, Assam. Retrieved from: Accessed 1 December 2014.
  5. Farzin, Y. H. (2010). Sustainability, optimality, and development policy. Review of Development Economics, 14(2), 262–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feenstra, T., Cesar, H., & Kort, P. (1999). Optimal control theory in environmental economics. Handbook of environmental and resource economics (pp. 1099–1107). School of Economics and Management, Netherlands organisation for scientific research (NWO) (No. 348cc100-2fb4-45b5-91ff-d0fa5120fe64).Google Scholar
  7. GEO: Global Environmental Outlook-03, United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved from: Accessed 3 December 2014.
  8. Hediger, W. (2009). Sustainable development with stock pollution. Environment and Development Economics, 14(06), 759–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. India State of Forest Reports. 2001–2013. Forest Survey of India, Dehradoon.Google Scholar
  10. Khatniar, B., Barua, A., & Talukdar, R. (2012). Dwindling forests in Assam, India: causes and remedies. The Clarion, 1(2), 154–167.Google Scholar
  11. Pezzey, J., & Toman, M. A. (2002). The economics of sustainability: a review of journal articles. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  12. Shone, R. (2002). Economic Dynamics: Phase diagrams and their economic application. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Humanities and Social SciencesIndian Institute of TechnologyGuwahatiIndia

Personalised recommendations