Advertisement

Socio-Economic and Environmental Performance Across North-Eastern States of India

Chapter
Part of the India Studies in Business and Economics book series (ISBE)

Abstract

The Northeastern region of India consists of eight states—Sikkim, Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland and Tripura. Their performance has similarities as well as dissimilarities under different socio-economic and environmental parameters. They have wide divergence in per capita income but by and large have low inequality in income distribution. The incidence of poverty in five of the eight states is lower than the national average. Six out of eight states have a lower infant mortality rate than the national average. Six out of eight states have a higher literacy rate than the national average. The Environmental Performance Index based on air pollution, water quality, forests, waste management and climate change varies from 0.43 to 0.75 across these states against a national average of 0.58. This chapter analyses the socio-economic and environmental performance of Northeastern states.

Keywords

Income and environment Growth and environment Sustainable development Environmental performance Socio-Economic performance Northeast India 

References

  1. Chandrasekharan, I., Kumar, R. S., Raghunathan, S., & Chandrasekharan, S. (2013). Construction of environmental performance index and rankings of States. Current Science, 104(4), 435–439.Google Scholar
  2. Government of India. (2014, June). Report of the Expert Group to Review the Methodology for Measurement of Poverty. Planning Commission, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  3. Government of India. (2014, July 3). Databook Compiled for Use of Planning Commission. Planning Commission, New Delhi. Retrieved from http://planningcommission.gov.in.
  4. Government of India. (2015). Statewise land use classification in India (2010–11 to 2012–13)—Part I, II & III. Ministry of Agriculture, New Delhi. Retrieved from http://www.indiaagristat.com/table/agriculture/2/landuse19502013/448932/7201/data.aspx.
  5. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 49, 1–28.Google Scholar
  6. Stern, D. I. (2004). The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets Curve. World Development, 32(8), 1419–1439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Rural ManagementAnandIndia

Personalised recommendations