Skip to main content

Farm Growth in Northeast India and Its Effect on Poverty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 645 Accesses

Part of the book series: India Studies in Business and Economics ((ISBE))

Abstract

Experience of growth in BRICS countries shows that one percentage growth in agriculture is two to three times more effective in poverty reduction when compared to one percentage growth emanating from non-agricultural sectors. State average of sectoral GSDP growth over 2008–09 to 2013–14 shows a recovery of 4.1% per annum as compared to 1.7% per annum during 2000–01 to 2004–05. Six out of the eight Northeastern states of India show higher than all India average performance during this period, viz. Sikkim (9.8%), Tripura (6.1%), Arunachal Pradesh (5.5%), Meghalaya (4.9%), Nagaland (4.9%) and Mizoram (4.3%). State wise analysis of various agricultural parameters and multi-dimensional poverty indicators revealed that each state has a unique relationship in terms of growth in agriculture and poverty. The hypothesis of high farm growth reduced poverty was true for Sikkim, Tripura, Meghalaya and Assam and true in the reverse direction for Manipur. High growth of agriculture was non-inclusive and hence could not have impact on poverty in Arunachal Pradesh and Nagaland. Mizoram with too many population in rural areas depending on agriculture had high farm growth and but increase in rural poverty. However, the state had only 0.094 MPI value in 2011–12. Overall, states with high GSDPA growth observed reduced poverty taking other parameters into account. States with high share of Non-Farm Sector (NFS) and Animal Husbandry (AH) in monthly income of agricultural household had improving rural poverty. Improving performance of agriculture needs to be focused upon reducing poverty, both incidence and intensity of poverty. Among agricultural inputs, irrigation needs to be prioritised, as in ground water resources in northeast India are under-utilized while blessed with sufficient rainfall, which offers scope to install a battery of shallow and deep tube wells to draw ground water during the Rabi season. Further, efforts are to be made to increase production and productivity of high-value crops. Northeastern states have skill and raw materials to engage in self-employment activities, viz. weaving, pottery, cane and bamboo products, etc., and therefore, with the development of agriculture sector, NFS also to be stressed upon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Sikkim joined the Indian union through a referendum in 1975 and was recognized as part of Northeast India in the 1990s.

  2. 2.

    Planning Commission estimates based on Tendulkar Committee methodology.

  3. 3.

    The Global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI), developed in 2010 by the Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative and the United Nations Development Programme, uses different factors to determine poverty beyond income-based lists. It replaced the previous Human Poverty Index. The proportion of the population that is multi-dimensionally poor is the incidence of poverty, or headcount ratio (H). The average proportion of indicators in which poor people are deprived is described as the intensity of their poverty (A). The MPI is calculated by multiplying the incidence of poverty by the average intensity of poverty across the poor (MPI = H × A); as a result, it reflects both the share of people in poverty and the degree to which they are deprive.

References

  • Agriculture Census, 2010–11. (2012). Agriculture census division, Department of agriculture & co-operation, Ministry of Agriculture, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2014. (2015). Oxford University Press: Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger, H. P. (1986). Agricultural mechanization: A comparative historical perspective. The World Bank Research Observer, 1, 27–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Census of India. (2011). Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy Pvt. Ltd. (CMIE). (2015). States of India. Retrieved from: http://statesofindia.cmie.com on June30, 2015.

  • Datt, G., & Ravallion, M. (1996). How important to India’s poor is the sectoral composition of economic growth? The World Bank Economic Review, 10, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of India (2013–14). (2014). Economic survey. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, J., Radelet, S., & Warner, A. (1997). Economic growth and the income of the poor. CAER Discussion Paper No. 36. Harvard Institute for International Development: Cambridge, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India. (2012a). State of Indian agriculture 2011–12. (2012). Ministry of Agriculture, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India. (2012b). Background note and agenda for conference of state ministers and state secretaries in-charge of rural water supply and rural sanitation, Ministry of Drinking Water & Sanitation, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India. (July, 2013). Poverty estimates for 2011–12, Press note on Poverty Estimates, 2011–12. Planning Commission, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India. (2014). Key indicators of situation of agricultural households in India, NSS 70th Round, MoSPI, GoI, December 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazell, P., Ramasamy, C., et al. (1991). The green revolution reconsidered: The impact of high-yielding rice varieties in South India. Baltimore, USA and London, UK: Johns Hopkins University Press for the International Food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agriculture, National Horticulture Board, India Horticulture Database—(2013) (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Agriculture, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Government of India. (2015). Land use statistics. Retrieved from http://eands.dacnet.nic.in/LUS_1999_2004.htm on July 15, 2015.

  • Lipton, M., & Longhurst, R. (1989). New seeds and poor people. London, UK: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI). (2015). India country briefing, multidimensional poverty index data bank. In Oxford poverty and human development initiative. University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pocket Book on Agricultural Statistics. (2013). Ministry of Agriculture, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warr, P. (2001). Poverty reduction and sectoral growth, results from South East Asia. Canberra, Australia: Australia National University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. U. Viswanathan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Viswanathan, K.U., Gupta, A. (2017). Farm Growth in Northeast India and Its Effect on Poverty. In: De, U., Pal, M., Bharati, P. (eds) Inequality, Poverty and Development in India. India Studies in Business and Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6274-2_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6274-2_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6273-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6274-2

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics