Advertisement

Family Farming in Amazon: Solution to Food and Regional Competitiveness

  • Alex Rotta Romani
  • Flávio de São Pedro Filho
  • Jeoval Batista da Silva
  • Janilene Vasconcelos de Melo
  • Jayashree Patil-Dake
Chapter
Part of the India Studies in Business and Economics book series (ISBE)

Abstract

The present study aims at strategies for competitive farming with sustainability. The research is based on “Theory U.” The study is of a qualitative nature, prepared through the Content Analysis Method, supported by bibliographical sources, to face empirically the strategy required to the sustainability with focus on competitive advantage. It is based upon three specific objectives. (1) To raise/craft the basic competitive strategies in the familiar farming activities (2) To analyze the operability of the strategies found in face of the perspective sustainability (3) To structure subsides to required innovation in socio-environmental sustainability with focus on family farming. It is observed that the adaptation of generators model of competitive advantage according to the theoretical concepts of Triple Bottom Line can direct the consecution of sustainable competitive advantages in the familiar farming activity.

Keywords

Amazon Business competitiveness Family agriculture Innovation Sustainability 

References

  1. Altieri, M. (2012). Agroecology: Scientific basis to a sustainable agriculture. São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro: Expressão Popular.Google Scholar
  2. Brito, R. P., & Brito, L. A. L. (2012). Competitive advantage and performance: a value creation approach. Journal of Contemporary Management, 16(3), 360–380. Available at http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rac/v16n3/v16n3a03.pdf. Accessed 8 October 2016.
  3. Brito, R. P., Yang, D. J., & Brito, L. A. L. (2012). Competitive advantage, creation of value and its effect on the performance (p. 52). São Paulo: ERA, São Paulo.Google Scholar
  4. Bowman, C., & Ambrosini, V. (2000). Value creation versus value capture: towards a coherent definition of value in strategy. British Journal of Management, 11(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  5. Coff, R. W. (2010). The coevolution of rent appropriation and capability development. Strategic Management Journal, 31(7), 711–733.Google Scholar
  6. Leão, J., & Avelino, A. (2014). Scientific innovation for an institutional development: Case study at the Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Acre—IFAC. Dissertation (Master in Administration). Post-Graduation Program—Master in Administration (PPGMAD) of the Federal University of Rondônia—UNIR, Porto Velho.Google Scholar
  7. Lima, O. C., & Silva, W. S. (2012). Family farming: Analysis from the theoretical framework of the authors about the national family farming strengthening program. Brasília: PRONAF.Google Scholar
  8. Mascarenhas, M. P., & Alex, W. (2013). Triple bottom line of sustainability: An analysis at the national companies producers of oils and fats. São Paulo: REUNIR.Google Scholar
  9. Minotti, P. F. (2014). Sustainability strategies: The environmental dimension in participating organizations of the clean development mechanism. Dissertation presented to the Post-Graduation Program in Administration of the Paulista University. São Paulo: UNESP.Google Scholar
  10. Mozzato, A. R., & Grzybovski, D. (2011). Content Analysis and qualitative data analysis technique in the administration field: Potential and challenge. Curitiba: ANPAD.Google Scholar
  11. Orsato, R. (2012). Strategies of sustainability: When does it worth to be green? Quality mark. São Paulo: EBAPE.Google Scholar
  12. Romani, A. R. (2013). Influences of the business compensation plan in satisfying the sales area employees. Work of course conclusion in administration at the Federal University of Rondônia. Porto Velho: UNIR.Google Scholar
  13. Santos, A. M. S., & Mitja, D. (2012). Family farming and local development: The challenges for an economic-ecologic sustainability at the Community of Palmares II, Parauapebas, PA. INTERAÇÕES, Campo Grande, 13(1), 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Scharmer, O. (2010). ‘The Blind Spot of Institutional Leadership: How To Create Deep Innovation Through Moving from Egosystem to Ecosystem Awareness’ presented in World Economic Forum Annual Meeting of the New Champions 2010 Tianjin, People’s Republic of China, 13-15 September.Google Scholar
  15. Siena, O. (2007). Methodology of the scientific research: Methodology of scientific research: Elements for preparation and presentation of academic works. Porto Velho: PPGMAD.Google Scholar
  16. Souza, G. R., & Cordeiro, J. S. (2010). Cognitive mapping and balanced score card strategic management of municipal solid waste. Management of production. São Carlos: UNESP.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alex Rotta Romani
    • 1
  • Flávio de São Pedro Filho
    • 1
  • Jeoval Batista da Silva
    • 1
  • Janilene Vasconcelos de Melo
    • 2
  • Jayashree Patil-Dake
    • 3
  1. 1.Research Group in Management of Innovation and Technology (GEITEC/UNIR)Federal University of Rondônia (UNIR)Porto VelhoBrazil
  2. 2.Federal University of RondôniaPorto VelhoBrazil
  3. 3.KPB Hinduja CollegeMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations