Skip to main content

Public Debt and Economic Growth in India: Evidence from Granger Causality Test

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 318 Accesses

Part of the book series: India Studies in Business and Economics ((ISBE))

Abstract

In the eve of inconclusive controversy over the “cause-effect” relationship between public debt and economic growth, this paper tries to examine this dynamic relationship empirically for the Indian economy over the period of 1980–1981 to 2015–2016. This paper applies the time-series techniques like unit root test, VAR lag selection criteria, Johansen cointegration test, VECM, VEC granger causality test, impulse response function, and variance decomposition function. The application of Johansen test on first order integrated series shows the presence of long-run cointegration among variables like domestic debt, external debt, and economic growth. The VECM model found the statistically significant and negative coefficient of error correction term in external debt equation expressing the restoration of the long-run equilibrium at the rate of 6.83% every year between growth, domestic debt, and external debt. The infliction of the VEC Granger causality test noticed that there is no feedback relationship among the variables in short run, but there exists the unidirectional causality from economic growth and domestic debt to external debt in long run. The result of impulse response function and variance decomposition function also confirms the long-run causality from growth and domestic debt to external debt. Therefore, these empirical results suggest that reliance on debt for development purposes is not a safe option, even though the presence of no feedback relationship among the said variables in short runs. So, Indian economy should ensure higher growth rate while accumulating public debt and should extend its efforts to increase the revenue to finance the development expenditure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The FRBM act brought the formalization in the fiscal discipline through the mechanism of slashing down the deficit in fiscal indicators like revenue deficit, fiscal deficit and primary deficit and, thereby, maintaining the sustainability and transparency in fiscal discipline.

  2. 2.

    Classical economists like J.B. Say, Adam Smith, Ricardo, Malthus, J.S. Mill, Bastable, Paul Leroy–Beaulieu, etc.

  3. 3.

    Debt overhang is the condition of an organization (for example, a business, government, or family) that has existing debt so great that it cannot easily borrow more money, even when that new borrowing is actually a good investment that would more than pay for itself. Simply, it asserts that if there is a possibility that countries’ future debt will be more than its repayment abilities.

  4. 4.

    The crowding out effect is an economic theory stipulating that rises in public sector spending drive down or even eliminate private sector spending. Again, if govt will go for higher ED and if the greater share of public debt (foreign capital) is used to treat the debt obligations, then very little would remain available to finance investment and growth; this cannel is also known as the crowding out effect” of ED.

  5. 5.

    GDP at the current price at market price is used as a proxy for economic growth. Because all other variables such as TPD, DD, ED are expressed in current price.

  6. 6.

    The vibrant concept ‘public debt’ plays a pivotal role in the traditional as well as modern or contemporary public finance. Literarily, public debt demonstrates the loans or liabilities raised by the government with a corresponding commitment to the repayment within a stipulated time period. Total Public Debt (TPD) is the combination of Domestic Debt (DD) and External Debt (ED).

  7. 7.

    Domestic Debt (DD), otherwise termed as National Debt, refers to the loans or borrowings raised by the public authorities within the legal jurisdiction of the economy. DD is not only composed of internal debt but also of small savings, provident funds & other accounts and reserve funds & deposits. The main internal sources from which the government can amass funds are individuals, non-banking financial institutions, commercial banks and central banks of the concerned economy.

  8. 8.

    A debt is said to be external debt (ED) if/when a loan is floated outside the country. Its main sources are foreign financial institutions, foreign governments, and foreign multinationals and international organization such as IMF, IBRD, and ADB etc.

References

  • Ahmed Q, Butt M, Sabihuddin M, Shaista A (2000) Economic growth, export and external debt causality: the case of Asian countries. Pak Dev Rev 34(4):591–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Akram Naeem (2011) Impact of public debt on the economic growth of Pakistan. Pak Dev Rev (Pakistan Institute of Development Economics) 50(4):599–615

    Google Scholar 

  • Amoateng K, Amoako-Adu B (1996) Economic growth, export and external debt causality: the case of African countries, Appl Econ 28(1):21–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Bal DP, Rath BN (2014) Public debt and economic growth in India: a reassessment. Econ Anal Policy 44(3):292–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balassone F, Francese M, Pace A (2010) Public debt and economic growth in Italy, Preliminary version

    Google Scholar 

  • Barik A (2012) Government debt and economic growth in India, Punjab University Paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ (1979) On the determination of the public debt. J Polit Econ 87(5, Part 1):940–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan JM (1955) Public Principles of Public Debt: a Defense and Restatement. vol 2. Homewood Ill, Richard D. Irwin

    Google Scholar 

  • Butts HC (2009) Short-term external debt and economic growth—Granger causality: evidence from latin America and the Caribbean. Rev Black Polit Econ 36:93–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cecchetti SG, Mohanty MS, Zampolli F (2011) The real effect of debt, BIS working paper 352. Basel, Switzerland: Bank for International Settlement

    Google Scholar 

  • Checherita C, Rother P (2010) The impact of high and growing government debt on economic growth: an empirical investigation for the Euro area, European Central Bank working paper series no. 1237

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury K (1994) A structural analysis of external debt and economic growth: some evidence from selected countries in Asia and the Pacific. Appl Econ 26(12):1121–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond P (1965) National debt in a neoclassical growth model, Am Econ Rev 55(5):1126–1150

    Google Scholar 

  • Dritsaki C (2013) Causal nexus between economic growth, exports and government debt: the case of Greece. Procedia Econ Finance 5:251–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egbetunde T (2012) Public debt and economic growth in Nigeria: evidence from Granger causality, Am J Econ 2(6):101–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmendorf D, Mankiw N (1999) Government debt. In: Taylor J, Woodford M (eds) Handbook of macroeconomics, vol 1C. North-Holland, pp 1615–1669

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira C (2009) Public debt and economic growth: a Granger causality panel data approach, working paper (ISEG-UTL), ISSN no. 0874-4548

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincke B, Greiner A (2014) Public debt and economic growth in emerging market economies, working paper in economics and management, no. 08–2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgiev B (2012) Implications of public debt on economic growth and development: a European study, Bachelor thesis, department of economics and business, Aarhus University

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaraman TK, Lau E (2008) Does external debt lead to economic growth in Pacific Island countries. J Policy Model 31:272–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Karagöl (2000) The causality analysis of external debt service and GNP: the case of Turkey. Cent Bank Rev 2(1):39–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur B, Mukherjee A (2012) Threshold level of debt and public debt sustainability: the Indian experience, Reserve Bank of India occasional papers, vol 33, no. 1&2

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar MS, Woo J (2010) Public debt and growth, International Monetary Fund working paper, 174: 1–45 Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner AP (1948) The Burden of the National Debt. In: Lloyd A. Metzler et al. (eds) Income, employment and public policy, Essays in Honour of Alvin Hanson, W. W. Norton, New York, 255–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Liew VKS (2004) Which lag length selection criteria should we employ? Econ Bull 3(33):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin S (2000) Government debt and economic growth in an overlapping generations model. South Econ J 66(3):754–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon JG (1996) Numerical distribution functions for unit root and cointegration tests. J Appl Econ 11:601–618

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon JG, Haug AA, Michelis L (1999) Numerical distribution functions of likelihood ratio tests for cointegration. J Appl Econ 14:563–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani F (1961) Long-run implications of alternative fiscal policies and the burden of the national debt. Econ J 71(284):730–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed MAA (2005) The impact of external debt on economic growth: an empirical assessment of the Sudan 1978–2001. Eastern Afr Soc Sci Res Rev 21(1):53–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Putunai GK, Mutukh CM (2013) Domestic debt and economic growth nexus in Kenya. Curr Res J Econ Theory 5(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao N, Govinda R, Rao K (2006) Trends and issues in tax policy and reform in India, India Policy Forum, NCAER

    Google Scholar 

  • Rais SI, Anwar S (2012) Public debt and economic growth in Pakistan: a time series analysis from 1972 to 2010. Acad Res Int 2(1):535–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart C, Rogoff K (2010) Growth in a time of debt. Am Econ Rev: Pap Proc 100(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schclarek A (2004) Debt and economic growth in developing and industrial countries, working papers 2005:34, Lund University, Department of Economics

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh C (1999) Domestic debt and economic growth in India. Econ Polit Wkly 34(23):1445–1453

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasos S (2014) Debt and economic growth: is there any causal effect? An empirical analysis with structural breaks and Granger causality for Greece, Theor Appl Econ XXI 1(590):51–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadad S (2012) Causality between economic growth, export, and external debt servicing: the case of Lebanon. Int J Econ Finance 4(11):134–143

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nityasundar Manik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

See Figure 10.2 and Table 10.6.

Fig. 10.2
figure 2

Share of TPD, DD and ED in GDP, Source Author’s estimation

Table 10.6 Result of compound annual growth rate

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Manik, N., Khan, N.A. (2018). Public Debt and Economic Growth in India: Evidence from Granger Causality Test. In: Khan, N. (eds) Challenges and Issues in Indian Fiscal Federalism. India Studies in Business and Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6217-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6217-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6216-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6217-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics