Skip to main content

Abstract

5D-BIM, a well-acknowledged innovation in construction, has been recognized to have positive influence on project performance and organizational effectiveness by both academic scholars and industry practitioners. In spite of such awareness and recognition, its adoption is still in the early stage in Hong Kong quantity surveying due to various challenges. Therefore, this research aims at investigating how 5D-BIM can be fostered by providing an overview of innovation in Hong Kong quantity surveying firstly, then exploring the impacts of various management strategies on 5D-BIM adoption and followed by giving some implementation strategies finally. The results of the questionnaire survey study indicate that innovation (5D-BIM) adoption is positively predicted by innovation climate and learning transfer climate and that 5D-BIM adoption in heterogeneous construction parties are motivated by different factors of innovation and learning transfer climates (e.g., support for innovation, performance self-efficacy, openness to change are essential management strategy factors for innovation in client developers’ organizations; factors of support for innovation and openness to change are important to innovation in contractors’ organizations; and factors of resource supply and performance-outcome expectation are essential to innovation in consultants’ organizations). Then cases of 5D-BIM adoption in Hong Kong are offered to validate the survey findings and to serve as the basis for proposing 5D-BIM implementation strategies for major construction parties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahire SL, Ravichandran T (2001) An innovation diffusion model of TQM implementation. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 48(4):445–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong A, Foley P (2003) Foundations for a learning organization: organization learning mechanisms. Learn Organ 10(2):74–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Expert Group in Industry Studies (1999) Mapping the building and construction product system in Australia. ISR, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Azhar S (2011) Building information modeling (BIM): trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry. Leadersh Manage Eng 11(3):241–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates R, Khasawneh S (2005) Organizational learning culture, learning transfer climate and perceived innovation in Jordanian organizations. Int J Training Dev 9(2):96–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birchall D, Chanaron JJ, Tovstiga G, Hillenbrand C (2011) Innovation performance measurement: current practices, issues and management challenges. Int J Technol Manage 56(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boland RJ Jr, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y (2007) Wakes of innovation in project networks: the case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organ Sci 18(4):631–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broad ML, Newstrom JW (1992) Transfer of training: action-packed strategies to ensure high payoff from training investments. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerinšek G, Dolinšek S (2009) Identifying employees’ innovation competency in organisations. Int J Innov Learn 6(2):164–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour F (1991) Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad Manag J 34(3):555–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dulaimi MF, Nepal MP, Park M (2005) A hierarchical structural model of assessing innovation and project performance. Constr Manage Econ 23(6):565–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao J, Fischer M, Tollefsen T, Haugen T (2005) Experiences with 3D and 4D CAD on building construction projects: benefits for project success and controllable implementation factors. Construction Informatics Digital Library, w78

    Google Scholar 

  • Green S (2011) Making sense of construction improvement. Wiley-Blackwell Publications, Oxford, p 148

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grilo A, Jardim-Goncalves R (2010) Value proposition on interoperability of BIM and collaborative working environments. Autom Constr 19(5):522–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumusluoglu L, Ilsev A (2009) Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation. J Bus Res 62(4):461–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JFJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis (5th edn), New Jersey, Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampson KD, Manley K (2001) Construction innovation and public policy in Australia. Innovation in construction: an international review of public policies pp 31–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins JM (1994) Innovate or evaporate: test and improve your organization’s IQ. New Management Publishing Company Inc, Winter Park, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton EF, Bates RA (2002) The learning transfer systems inventory, Louisiana State University, Office of HRD Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton EF, Bates RA, Ruona WEA (2000) Development of a generalized learning transfer system inventory. Human Resour Dev Q 11(4):333–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu AG (2003) R&D organization, monitoring intensity, and innovation performance in Chinese industry. Econ Innov New Technol 12(2):117–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James LR, Sells SB (1981) Psychological climate: theoretical perspectives and empirical research. Toward a psychology of situations: an interactional perspective pp 275–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser S, Holton E (1998) The learning organization as a performance improvement strategy. In: R. Torraco (ed), Proceedings of the Academy of Human Resource Development Conference pp 75–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesting P, Ulhoi JP (2010) Employee-driven innovation: extending the license to foster innovation. Manag Decis 48(1):65–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kissi J, Dainty A, Liu A (2012) Examining middle managers’ influence on innovation in construction professional services firms: a tale of three innovations. Constr Innov: Inf, Process, Manage 12(1):11–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubba S (2012) Building information modelling, Handbook of Green Building Design and Construction: LEED, BREE and Green Globes, in S Kubba edn, Butterworth-Heinemann

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzarotti V, Manzini R, Mari L (2011) A model for R&D performance measurement. Int J Prod Econ 134(1):212–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins EC, Terblanche F (2003) Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. Eur J Innov Manage 6(1):64–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford MD, Gustafson SB (1988) Creativity syndrome: integration, application, and innovation. Psychol Bull 103(1):27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NESTA (2008) Total innovation. NESTA, National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts. Retrieved at http://www.nesta.org.uk/publications/reports/assets/features/total_innovation, on 24 August 2010

  • Pedersen DO (1996) The economics of innovation in construction. In: Katavic M (ed) Economics management of innovation, productivity and quality in construction: CIB W55 building economics 7th international symposium, Zagreb, Croatia, 4–7 September, pp 158–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott SG, Bruce RA (1994) Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Acad Manag J 37(3):580–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S, Kaemmerer W (1978) Measuring the perceived support for innovation in organizations. J Appl Psychol 63:553–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter ES (1998) Models of construction innovation. J Constr Eng Manage 124(3):226–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian A, Nilakanta S (1996) Organizational innovativeness: exploring the relationship between organizational determinants of innovation, types of innovations, and measures of organizational performance. Omega 24(6):631–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Research Grants Council under the General Research Fund (Project No. HKU 715111).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chan, I.Y.S., Liu, A.M.M., Chen, B. (2018). Management Strategies for 5D-BIM Adoption in Hong Kong. In: Chau, K., Chan, I., Lu, W., Webster, C. (eds) Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6190-5_91

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics