Skip to main content

Abstract

Thermal insulation is one of the main factors considered for the energy efficiency in buildings. It is a requirement to insulate the walls, roofs and floor according to the necessary standards. The thermal insulation is given in Total R-Values and required R-Values are obtained through changing the insulation material, sarking material, air films and roof covering. Therefore there are many options available to obtain the required total R-Value. This research focused on developing life cycle costs for each of these different types of roofing solutions in pitched roof structures. For each of these options, life cycle cost is calculated and reported. Finally an analysis is done based on the life cycle cost figures. According to the research the maintenance cost of the pitched roofs amounts of 20% of the life cycle cost. Tiled roof has a higher disposal costs compared to metal roofs. Life cycle cost increases with the increment of the Total R-Value of the roof structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Australia Building Codes Board (2016) National construction code 2016; Building code of Australia. The Australian Building Codes Board, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian National Audit Office, “Life cycle costing—better practice guide,” 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Goussous J, Al-Refaie A (2014) Evaluation of a green building design using LCC and AHP techniques. Life Sci J 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Green Building Council Australia, “Green Star-Design & as built v1.1,” 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Insulation Council of Australia and New Zealand (2014) Insulation handbook, in Part 1: Thermal performance. Insulation Council of Australia and New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankovic L (2013) Designing zero carbon buildings using dynamic simulation methods: Taylor and Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawlinsons (2015) Rawlinson construction cost guide, vol 33. Rawlinson Publishing, Perth, Western Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Roels SM (2011) The effect of a reflective underlay on the global thermal behaviour of pitched roofs. Build Environ 46:134–143, 1/2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Roels S, Langmans J (2016) Highly insulated pitched roofs resilient to air flow patterns: guidelines based on a literature review. Energy Build 120:10–18, 5/15/2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Roofing Contractor (2016 Aug 15). Available: http://www.roofingcontractor.com/articles/89106-making-a-case-for-roof-maintenance

  • Zhang H (2011) Building materials in civil engineering, 1st edn. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support from the Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Project under grant number DP150101015.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vivian W. Y. Tam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Illankoon, I.M.C.S., Tam, V.W.Y., Le, K.N. (2018). Life Cycle Costing for Insulated Pitched Roof Structures. In: Chau, K., Chan, I., Lu, W., Webster, C. (eds) Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6190-5_88

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics