Skip to main content

Evolutionary Game Analysis on the Low-Carbon City Construction Between Central and Local Government in China

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate
  • 3709 Accesses

Abstract

Global warming caused by carbon emission has been recognized as a big threat to the sustainability of the world. Developing low-carbon city has become an important strategy in China in response to increasingly serious global warming and the international pressure of reducing carbon emissions. In order to facilitate the strategy of building low-carbon city can be effectively carried out, it is very important to conduct a deep analysis on how to guide local government to thoroughly complete the low-carbon city construction policies. In this study, the central government and local government are selected as the main research body of the evolutionary game. Then the optimal strategies decision of both sides has been discussed comprehensively based on Replicated Dynamic Equation by employing the evolutionary game model. It is found that the benefits and costs of local government in promoting and developing the low-carbon city, subsidies and punishments from central government should be given with the highest priority for decision making in implementing low-carbon city in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Becky H (2012) A low-carbon London now and beyond. In: Paul W (ed) Base London 2012 report, London, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Betsill M, Bulkeley H (2007) Looking back and thinking ahead: a decade of cities and climate change research. Local Environ 12:447–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng H, Li C (2014) On the experiences of foreign low carbon city construction with the perspective of good governance. Chin Pub Adm 32–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Du D, Zhuang G, Xie H (2015) Study on the evaluation of low-carbon cities from “promoting construction by evaluation” to “the combination of evaluation and construction”. Urban Dev Stud 22:7–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavin N (2004) Climate action plan for San Francisco local actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. San Francisco Department of the Environment San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou F, Li M (2016) The development path research of energy low-carbon transformation of the Changzhutan City group. Spec Zone Econ 94–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna N, Fridley D, Hong L (2014) China’s pilot low-carbon city initiative: a comparative assessment of national goals and local plans. Sustain Cities Soc 12:110–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, He Y (2015) Decoupling analysis between the economic growth and carbon emissions in Chinese low-carbon cities pilots. Sci Technol Prog Policy 32:51–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Geng Y, Xue B, Dong H, Han H (2011a) Low-carbon city’s quantitative assessment indicator framework based on decoupling model. China Popul Resour Environ 21:19–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Geng Y, Xue B, Fu J, Tang X (2011b) Relationships between economic growth and CO2 emissions for low-carbon pilot provinces in China. Resour Sci 33:620–625

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishida Y, Hua Y (2011) Motivating stakeholders to deliver change: Tokyo’s cap-and-trade program. Build Res Inf 39:518–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Örjan L, Charlotta H, Adi M (2010) Stockholm action plan for climate and energy 2010–2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang H (2016) Research on the development path of national pilot low-carbon city (town) based on the perspective of carbon emission reduction. Urban Dev Stud 23:15–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Parzen J (2010) Lessons learned: creating the Chicago climate action plan: city of Chicago department of environment, Chicago. J Great Lakes Res 36(sp2):115–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Plan of Copenhagen Climate Adaptation (2011) Copenhagen carbon neutral by 2025, City of Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph S, Kawakatsu T (2012) Tokyo’s greenhouse gas emissions trading scheme: a model for sustainable megacity carbon markets. Market Based Instrum Nat Experiences Environ Sustain 77–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen L, Shuai C, Jiao L, Tan Y, Song X (2016a) A global perspective on the sustainable performance of urbanization. Sustainability 8:783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen L, Song X, Wu Y, Liao S, Zhang X (2016b) Interpretive structural modeling based factor analysis on the implementation of emission trading system in the Chinese building sector. J Clean Prod 127:214–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen L, Shuai C, Jiao L, Tan Y, Song X (2017) Dynamic sustainability performance during urbanization process between BRICS countries. Habitat Int 60:19–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng G (2016) Policy analysis of the low–carbon city construction in China. Ecol Econ 32:39–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenzhen’s Development and Reform Commission (2012) The mid-long term planning for Shenzhen low-carbon development

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuai C, Shen L, Jiao L, Wu Y, Tan Y (2017) Identifying key impact factors on carbon emission: evidences from panel and time-series data of 125 countries from 1990 to 2011. Appl Energy 187:310–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song W (2012) Appraisal of low-carbon development to 28 cities along the Yangtze River. Areal Res Dev 31:139–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan Y, Shuai C, Jiao L, Shen L (2017) An adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) approach for measuring country sustainability performance. Environ Impact Assess Rev 65:29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y (2012) Countermeasures study on Chinese low-carbon urban construction from the perspective of behavior subject theory. Sci Technol Manage Res

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang R, Wang J (2011) Searching for China’s low-carbon city development path: a landscape oriented perspective. Urban Dev Stud 18:53–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Ma Z (2014) The local government role and behavior of institutional innovation in low carbon city pilot: a case of Zhuhai City. Chin Pub Adm 353

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng H, Hu J, Wang W (2016) When will 100 Chinese cites reach peak carbon? China Popul Resour Environ 26:48–54

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is part of the research project sponsored by the Chinese National Social Science Program Fund, entitled “Assessment indicators for low-carbon city (15AZD025)”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiangnan Song .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lou, Y., Song, X., Yan, H. (2018). Evolutionary Game Analysis on the Low-Carbon City Construction Between Central and Local Government in China. In: Chau, K., Chan, I., Lu, W., Webster, C. (eds) Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6190-5_65

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics