Skip to main content

Evaluating the Critical Risk Factors of Reconstruction Urban Renewal Projects: The Developer’s Perspective in China

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate
  • 3706 Accesses

Abstract

The reconstruction urban renewal projects has been confronted with the problems such as social conflict and half-way project. If these problems cannot be addressed properly, not only will the developer suffer a great economic loss, but it may also threat the safety and stability of society. In order to manage project risks more properly, based on the literature review and experts interview, this paper identified 29 potential risk factors and adopted questionnaire survey and factor analysis to extract 6 clusters and 22 critical factors altogether. The research indicated that the critical risk factors of reconstructing urban renewal projects can be reflected by 6 clusters, among which project management risk and social and policy risk, weighting over 40%, were identified as the most critical risk factors. In general, the developer can boost the possibility of project success by emphasizing the control of project management risk and social and policy risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ayres AD, Thomas MP (1998) Environmental risk perception and urban renewal in the West Midlands. J Environ 18(3):139–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai JG, Sai YX (2014) An analysis of influencing of risk factors in shantytowns renovation project based on interpretative structural modeling. J Sci Technol Manag Res 34(6):240–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Field A (2005) Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage Publications Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu JL, Zhang JK (2010) Risk management on urban retrofitting projects. J Eng Manag 24(1):33–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser H (1970) A second generation little jiffy. J Psychometr 35(4):401–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khumpaisal S, Chen Z, Mulliner E (2012) Applying the analytical risk assessment method for an urban regeneration project, In: Built environment research associate conference

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo YC, Ji NC (2011) Exploring risks for urban renewal projects. In: Isarc proceedings

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu YF, Xu XW (2005) Risk identification of old city reconstruction project. J Urban Rural Dev 2:31–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Norusis MJ (2008) SPSS16.0 advanced statistical procedures companion. Prentice Hall Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian YP (2009) Old city reconstruction and reconstruction of urban social space-with Wuhan City as an example. Peking University Press (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia NK, Song HY (2007) Trains of thoughts and methods of study on risk issues for large scale urban development projects. J Urban Plann Forum 6:84–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu JH, Lee CK (2012) A conflict-risk assessment model for urban regeneration projects using Fuzzy-FMEA. J KSCE J Civ Eng 16(7):1093–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu YJ, Li H, Wang W (2015) Research on evolving characteristics and trend of urban renewal. J Urban Prob (9):30–35 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. D. Wu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wu, W., Liu, G., Cai, Z., Zheng, S. (2018). Evaluating the Critical Risk Factors of Reconstruction Urban Renewal Projects: The Developer’s Perspective in China. In: Chau, K., Chan, I., Lu, W., Webster, C. (eds) Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6190-5_61

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics