Skip to main content

Health-Care Provisions and Responses in Practice Settings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 438 Accesses

Abstract

Health system has a key role in a multi-sector response in addressing domestic violence. This chapter reviews the evidence for clinical intervention models and discusses components of comprehensive health system approach that helps health-care providers to identify and support women subjected to domestic violence. Additionally, the chapter focuses on multiple level barriers at individual and institutional level. Further, it elaborates the behavioural and attitudinal barriers, interactional barriers system approach and implementation barriers. Some countries have guidelines and protocols articulating the role of health-care providers and implemented in the health system. A variety of tools have been developed to aid the professionals to meet the needs of victims to promote health and well-being of the women. In this chapter, the tools are organized into four categories such as identification through screening, assessment, safety planning and documentation. In addition, the chapter discusses methods of strengthening the health system through case studies especially India, including capacity building, effective coordination between agencies and referral networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  1. Shipway L. Domestic violence—a handbook for health professionals. London and New York: Routledge; 2004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Feder GS, Hutson M, Ramsay J, Taket AR. Women exposed to intimate partner violence: expectations and experiences when they encounter health care professionals: a meta-analysis of qualitative studies. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:22–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. The Gazette of India. The protection of women from Domestic Violence Act. September 14. Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India. New Delhi: Authority; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Planning Commission. Twelfth five year plan 2012–17. New Delhi: Planning Commission, Government of India; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  5. British Medical Association (BMA). Domestic violence: a health care issue?. London: British Medical Association; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bartels SA, Scott JA, Leaning J, et al. Demographics and care-seeking behaviors of sexual violence survivors in south Kivu province. Demographic Republic of Congo. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2012;6:393–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tiwari A, Fong DY, Yuen KH, et al. Effect of an advocacy intervention on mental health in Chinese women survivors of intimate partner violence: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;304:536–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bonomi AE, Thompson RS, Anderson M, Reid RJ, Carrell D, Dimer JA, et al. Intimate partner violence and women’s physical, mental, and social functioning. Am J Prev Med. 2006;30(6):458–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ansara DL, Hindin MJ. Formal and informal help seeking associated with women’s and men’s experiences of intimate partner violence in Canada. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70:1011–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hanson RF, Sawyer GK, Begle AM, Hubel GS. The impact of crime victimization on quality of life. J Trauma Stress. 1010;23(2):189–97.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Campbell J, Laughton K, Woods A. Impact of intimate partner abuse on physical and mental health: how does it present in clinical practice? In: Roberts G, Hegarty K, Feder G, editors. Intimate partner abuse and health professionals: new approaches to domestic violence. London: Elsevier; 2006. p. 43–60.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Beynon CE, Gutmanis AI, Tutty LM, Wathen CN, MacMillan HL. Why physicians and nurses ask (or don’t) about partner violence: a qualitative analysis. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:473.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Zakar R, Zakar MZ, Kraemer A. Primary health care physicians’ response to the victims of spousal violence against women in Pakistan. Health Care Women Int. 2011;32(9):811–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Carlson EB, Dutton MA. Assessing experiences and responses of crime victims. J Trauma Stress. 2003;16:133–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rivara FP, Anderson ML, Fishman P, Bonomi AE, Reid RJ, Carrell D, Thompson RS. Health-care utilization and costs for women with a history of intimate partner violence. Am J Prev Med. 2007;32(2):89–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. United Nations Population Fund Asia Pacific (UNFPA), Regional Office. Health sector response to gender-based violence: an assessment of the Asia Pacific region. Bangkok: UNFPA Asia Pacific Regional Office; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Choi SY, Ting KF. Wife beating in South Africa: an imbalance theory of resources and power. J Interpers Violence. 2008;23:834–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Umubyeyi A, Persson M, Mogren I, Krantz G. Gender inequality prevents abused women from seeking care despite protection given in gender-based violence legislation: a qualitative study from Rwanda. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(5):e0154540.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Usta J, Feder G, Antoun J. Attitudes towards domestic violence in Lebanon: a qualitative study of primary care practitioners. Br J Gen Pract. 2014;64(623):313–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Feder GS, Hutson M, Ramsay J, Taket AR. Women exposed to intimate partner violence: expectations and experiences when they encounter health care professionals: a meta-analysis of qualitative studies. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(1):22–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rose D, Trevillion K, Woodall A, Morgan C, Feder G, Howard L. Barriers and facilitators of disclosures of domestic violence by mental health service users: qualitative study. Br J Psychiatry. 2011;198:189–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR). A study of health consequences of domestic violence in India. A report. New Delhi: ICMR; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wathen CN, Tanaka M, Catallo C, Lebner AC, Friedman MK, Hanson MD, et al. Are clinicians being prepared to care for abused women? A survey of health professional education in Ontario, Canada. BMC Med Educ. 2009;9:34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Aksan HA, Aksu F. The training needs of Turkish emergency department personnel regarding intimate partner violence. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:350.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. O’Doherty LJ, Taft A, Hegarty K, Ramsay J, Davidson LL, Feder G. Screening women for intimate partner violence in health-care settings: abridged Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2014;348:g2913.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim J, Motsei M. “Women enjoy punishment”: attitudes and experiences of gender-based violence among PHC nurses in rural South Africa. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54(8):1243–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Djikanovic B, Celik H, Simic S, Matejic B, Cucic V. Health professionals’ perceptions of intimate partner violence against women in Serbia: opportunities and barriers for response improvement. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;80(1):88–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. García-Moreno C, Hegarty K, D’Oliveira AFL, Koziol-McLain J, Colombini M, Feder G. The health-systems response to violence against women. Lancet. 2014;385(9977):1567–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mahapatro M. Training on gender violence, health and human rights for health-care professionals—a training manual. New Delhi: NIHFW; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Williamson E. Domestic violence and health: the response of the medical profession. London: Policy Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mahapatro M, Prasad S, Dhar N. Impact of behavioral intervention package on the health status of married abused pregnant women attending antenatal clinic of LN hospital, New Delhi—a randomized controlled trial. Report. New Delhi, India: NIHFW; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Odero M, Hatcher AM, Bryant C, Onono M, Romito P, et al. Responses to and resources for intimate partner violence: qualitative findings from women, men, and service providers in rural Kenya. J Interpers Violence. 2014;29:783–805.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Beydoun HA, Williams M, Beydoun MA, Eid SM, Zonderman AB. Relationship of physical intimate partner violence with mental health diagnoses in the nationwide emergency department sample. J Women’s Health. 2017;26(2):141–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Calvete E, Corral S, Estevez A. Coping as a mediator and moderator between intimate partner violence and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Violence Against Women. 2008;14(8):886–904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Howard LM, Trevillion K, Khalifeh H, Woodall A, Agnew-Davies R, Feder G. Domestic violence and severe psychiatric disorders: prevalence and interventions. Psychol Med. 2009;40:1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Iverson KM, Resick PA, Suvak MK, Walling S, Taft CT. Intimate partner violence exposure predicts PTSD treatment engagement and outcome in cognitive processing therapy. Behav Ther. 2011;42(2):236–48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Cohen LR, Field C, Campbell AN, Hien DA. Intimate partner violence outcomes in women with PTSD and substance use: a secondary analysis of NIDA clinical trials network “women and trauma” multi-site study. Addict Behav. 2013;38(7):2325–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Wiist WH, McFarlane J. The effectiveness of an abuse assessment protocol in public health prenatal clinics. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(8):1217–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. O’Campoa P, Kirstd M, Tsamisa C, Chambersa C, Ahmadb F. Implementing successful intimate partner violence screening programs in health care settings: Evidence generated from a realist-informed systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(6):855–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Deosthali PB, Ravindran TKS, Vindhya U. Addressing domestic violence within health-care settings the Dilassa model. Econ Polit Wkly. 2012;47(17):66–75.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Thurston WE, Eisener A. Successful integration and maintenance of screening for domestic violence in the health care sector. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2006;7:83–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kiely M, El-Mohandes AA, El-Khorazaty MN, Blake SM, Gantz MG. An integrated intervention to reduce intimate partner violence in pregnancy: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(2):273–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Warshaw C, Taft A. Educating health professionals: changing attitudes and overcoming barriers. In: Roberts G, Hegarty K, Feder G, editors. Intimate partner abuse and health professionals: new approaches to domestic violence. London: Elsevier; 2006. p. 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ministry of Women and Child Development (MWCD). One stop centre. Implementation guidelines for States, UT Administration. New Delhi: MWCD; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Feder G, Ramsay J, Dunne D, Rose M, Arsene C, Norman R, et al. How far does screening women for domestic (partner) violence in different health-care settings meet criteria for a screening programme? Systematic reviews of nine UK National Screening Committee criteria. Health Technol Assess 2009;13(16):iii–iv, xi–xiii, 1–113, 137–347.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Gregory A, Ramsay J, Agnew-Davies R, Baird K, Devine A, Dunne D, Eldridge S, Howell A, Johnson M, Rutherford C, Sharp D, Feder G. Primary care Identification and Referral to Improve Safety of women experiencing domestic violence (IRIS): protocol for a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Tiwari A, Leung WC, Leung TW, Humphreys J, Parker B, Ho PC. A randomised controlled trial of empowerment training for Chinese abused pregnant women in Hong Kong. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;112(9):1165–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Katz KS, Blake SM, Milligan RA, Sharps PW, White DB, Rodan MP, Rossi M, Murray KB. The design, implementation and acceptability of an integrated intervention to address multiple behavioral and psychosocial risk factors among pregnant African American women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008;8:22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Tiwari A, Fong DY, Yuen KH, Yuk H, Pang P, Humphreys J, Bullock L. Effect of an advocacy intervention on mental health in Chinese women survivors of intimate partner violence: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;304(5):536–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. El-Mohandes AA, Kielt M, Joseph JG, Subramanian S, Johnson AA, Blake SM, Gantz MG, El-Khorazaty MN. An intervention to improve postpartum outcomes in African-American Mothers: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(3):611–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Daugherty JD, Houry DE. Intimate partner violence screening in the emergency department. J Postgrad Med. 2008;54:30–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Bergman B, Brismar B. Battered wives-measured by the social and medical services. Postgrad Med J. 1990;66:28–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Houry D, Kaslow NJ, Kembell RS, McNutt L, Cerulli C, Stras H, et al. Does screening in the emergency department hurt or help victim of intimate partner violence. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;51:433–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Schorstein S. Domestic violence and health care. London: Sage; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Taft A, O’Doherty L, Hegarty K, Ramsay J, Davidson L, Feder G. Screening women for intimate partner violence in health-care settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;30(4):CD007007.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Rishal P, Joshi SK, Lukasse M, Schei B, Swanberg K. ‘They just walk away’—women’s perception of being silenced by antenatal health workers: a qualitative study on women survivors of domestic violence in Nepal. Glob Health Action. 2016;9. 10.3402/gha.v9.31838.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Gielen AC, Campbell J, Garza MA, Ocampo P, Dienemann J, Kub J, Jones AS, Lloyd DW. Domestic violence in the military: women’s policy preferences and beliefs concerning routine screening and mandatory reporting. Mil Med. 2006;171(8):729–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Mezey G, King M, MacClintock T. Victims of violence and the general practitioner. Br J Gen Pract. 1998;48:906–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Gerbert B, Moe J, Caspers N, Salber P, Feldman M, Herzig K, Bronstone A. Simplifying physicians’ response to domestic violence. West J Med. 2000;172(5):329–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Gottlieb AS. Domestic violence: a clinical guide for women’s health-care providers. Obstetrician Gynaecologist. 2012;14:197–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Bohn DK. Domestic violence and pregnancy: implications for practice. J Nurse Midwifery. 1990;35:86–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Gielen AC, O’Campo PJ, Faden RR, Kass NE, Xue X. Interpersonal conflict and physical violence during the childbearing year. Soc Sci Med. 1994;39:781–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Erickson MJ, Hill TD, Siegel RM. Barriers to domestic violence screening in the pediatric setting. Pediatrics. 2001;108(1):98–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Chamberlain L, Levenson R. Futures without violence and American congress of obstetricians and gynecologists. In: Addressing intimate partner violence, reproductive and sexual coercion: a guide for obstetric, gynecologic and reproductive health care settings. San Francisco, CA: Futures Without Violence; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Reichenheim ME, Moraes CL. Comparison between the abuse assessment screen and the revised conflict tactics scales for measuring physical violence during pregnancy. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58:523–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Mahapatro M, Gupta RN, Gupta VK. Risk factor of domestic violence in India. Indian J Community Med. 2012;37(3):153–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Ormon K, Sunnqvist C, Bahtsevani C, Levander MT. Disclosure of abuse among female patients within general psychiatric care—a cross sectional study. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;12.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Haggblom AME, Moller AR. On a life-saving mission: nurses willingness to encounter with intimate partner abuse. Qual Health Res. 2006;16(8):1075–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Hendler TJ, Sutherland SE. Domestic violence and its relation to dentistry: a call for change in canadian dental practice. JCDA. 2007;73(7):617e.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Nelms AP, Gutmann ME, Solomon ES, Dewald JP, Campbell PR. What victims of domestic violence need from the dental profession. J Dent Educ. 2009;73(4):490–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Mullender A. Rethinking domestic violence: the social work and probation response. London: Routledge; 1996.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  72. Bacchus L, Mezey G, Bewley S. Experiences of seeking help from health professionals in a sample of women who experienced domestic violence. Health Soc Care Community. 2003;11(1):10–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. General Medical Council. Duties of a doctor. London: General Medical Council; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Emma C. Disclosure of confidential information to protect the patient: the role of legal capacity in the evolution of professional guidance. J Med Law Ethics. 2015;3(1–2):7–23.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Rabin RF, Jennings JM, Campbell JC, Bair-Merritt MH. Intimate partner violence screening tools: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(5):439–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Basile KC, Hertz MF, Back SE. Intimate partner violence and sexual violence victimization assessment instruments for use in health-care settings, Version 1. Atlanta, GA: Centre for Disease Control and Prevention; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Wathen CN, MacMillan HL, Jamieson E. Screening for intimate partner violence. Am J Prev Med. 2006;31(5):453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Hamby S, Cook SL. Assessing violence against women in practice settings; processes and tools practitioners can use. In: Renzetti CM, Edleson JL, Bergen RK, editors. Sourcebook on violence against women. 2nd ed. USA: Sage Publication, Inc.; 2011. p. 49–71.

    Google Scholar 

  79. McFarlane J, Parker B, Soeken K, Bullock L. Assessing for abuse during pregnancy: severity and frequency of injuries and associated entry in prenatal care. J Am Med Assoc. 1992;267:3176–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Straus MA, Hamby SL, Boney-McCoy S, Sugarman DB. The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2): development and preliminary psychometric data. J Fam Issues. 1996;17(3):283–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Feldhaus KM, Kozoil-McLain J, Amsbury HL, Norton IM, Lowenstein SR, Abbott JT. Accuracy of 3 brief screening questions for detecting partner violence in the emergency department. JAMA. 1997;277(17):1357–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Sherin KM, Sinacore JM, Li XQ, Zitter RE, Shakil A. HITS: a short domestic violence screening tool for use in a family practice setting. Fam Med. 1998;30(7):508–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Ernst AA, Weiss SJ, Cham E, Marquez M. Comparison of three instruments for assessing ongoing intimate partner violence. Med Sci Monit. 2002;8(3):CR197–201.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Houry D, Kaslow NJ, Kemball RS, McNutt L, Cerulli C, Straus H, et al. Does screen ing in the emergency department hurt or help victims of intimate partner violence? Ann Emergency Med. 2008;521:433–442.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Rhodes KV, Drum M, Anliker E, Franket RM, Howes DS, Levinson W. Lowering the threshold for discussions of domestic violence: a randomized controlled trial of computer screen. 2006;166:1107–1114.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Waller AE, Hohenhaus SM, Shah PJ, Stern EA. Development and validation of an emergency department screening and referral protocol for victims of domestic violence. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;27:754–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Ambuel B, Hamberger LK, Lahti J. Partner violence: a systematic approach to identification and intervention in outpatient health-care. Wis Med J. 1996;95:292–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Family Violence Prevention Fund. National consensus guidelines on identifying and responding to domestic violence victimization in health care setting San Francisco: Family Violence Prevention Fund; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Betancourt JR, Green AR, Carrillo JE, Ananeh-Firempong O. Defining cultural competence: a practical framework for addressing racial/ethnic disparities in health and health-care. Public Health Rep. 2003;118:293–302.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Nelson HD, Bougatsos C, Blazina I. Screening women for intimate partner violence: a systematic review to update the U.S. preventive services task force recommendation. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(11):796–808.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. American Medical Association (AMA). Diagnostic and treatment guidelines on domestic violence. AMA, Chicago; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Stevens L. Screening for sexual violence: gaps in research and recommendation fr change. 2007. Retrieved 12 Oct 2009, from http://www.vawnet.org.

  93. Daugherty JD, Houry DE. Intimate partner violence screening in the emergency department. J Postgrad Med. 2008;54:301–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Royal College of Midwives. Domestic abuse in pregnancy’, position paper no. 19a. London: Royal College of Midwives.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Morgan J. Conference news from the royal college of midwives. Bournemouth Bull. Wednesday 1 May 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Department of Health. Conference report: domestic violence. A health response: working in a wider partnership. DoH, London; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Kalra N, Tanna GLD, Garcia-Moreno C. Training health-care providers to respond to intimate partner violence against women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2:Art. No.: CD012423.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Taket A, Wathen CN, MacMillan H. Should health professionals screen all women for domestic violence? PLoS Med. 2004;1(1):e4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Rhodes KV, Drum M, Anliker E, Frankel RM, Howes DS, Levinson W. Lowering the threshold for discussions of domestic violence—a randomized controlled trial of computer screen. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1107–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. British Association for Accident and Emergency Medicine (BAAEM). Domestic violence: recognition and management in accident and emergency. London: BAAEM at the Royal College of Surgeons of England; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Laing l. Risk assessment in domestic violence. Sydney: Australian Domestic and Family Violence Clearing House; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Campbell JC. Nursing assessment for risk of homicide with attired women. Adv Nurs Sci. 1986;8:36–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Kropp PR, Hart SD. The development of the brief spousal assault form for the evaluation of risk (b-SAFFER)—a tool for criminal justice professionals. Ottawa: Department of Justice Canada; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Kropp PR, Hart SD. The spousal assault risk assessment (SARA) guide: reliability and validity in adult male offenders. Law Hum Behav. 2000;24:101–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Au A, Cheg G, Kropp PR, Yk-Chung C, Laam G, Sung P. A preliminary validation of the brief spousal assault form for the evaluation risk (B-saffer) in Hong Kong. J Fam Violence. 2008;23:727–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Goodkind JR, Sullivan CM, Bybee DI, et al. A contextual analysis of battered women’s safety planning. Violence Against Women. 2004;10(5):514–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Hart BJ, Struehling J. Personalized safety plan, Barbara J. Harts collected writings. 1992. Retrieved 7 Feb 2013, from http:/www.mincava.umaa.educ/documents/har/hart.html#d237565.

    Google Scholar 

  108. National Coalition against Domestic Violence. Safety plane. 2009. Retrieved 9 Sept 2013, from http://www.ncadv.org/protectorself/plan.php.

  109. National Center for Victims of Crime. Safety plan guidelines. 1998. Retrieved 11 May 2014, from http://www.ndvh.org/help/safety%20planning.

  110. Davenport DD, Richey J, Westbrook L. E-government access to social service information: state web resources for domestic violence survivors. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2008;59(6):903–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Ministry of Women and Child Development (MWCD) and UNICEF. Manual for medical officers dealing with medico-legal cases of victims of trafficking for commercial sexual exploitation and child sexual abuse. New Delhi: MWCD; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Isaac NE, Enos VP. Documenting domestic violence: how health care providers can help victims. U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice: Policy Brief; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Jina R, Jewkes R, Munjaja SP, Mariscal JD, Dartnall E, Gebrehiwot Y, The FIGO working Group. Report of the FIGO working group on sexual violence/HIV: guidelines for the management of female survivors of sexual assault. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;109(2):85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Rybarczyk M, Tosha M, Mbika B, et al. Evaluation of medical supplies essential for the care of survivors of sex, and gender-based violence in post-conflict Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Med Conft Surviv. 2011;27:91–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. The Gazette of India. The protection of children from sexual offense. Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India. New Delhi: Authority; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  116. National Commission for Protection of Child Rights, Government of India. 2015. Retrieved on 17 Aug 2014 from http://ncpcr.gov.in/.

  117. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW). Guidelines & protocols—medico-legal care for survivors/victims of sexual violence. New Delhi: MOHFW, Government of India; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  118. NNEDV’s Safety Net Project. Victim confidentiality considerations for domestic violence and sexual assault programs when responding to rare or emergency situations, p. 1–5. The Confidentiality Institute and National Network to End Domestic Violence. 2010. www.nnedv.org/safetynet.

  119. Muller L, Spitz E. Multidimensional assessment of coping: validation of the Brief COPE among French population. Encephale. 2003;29:507–18.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Selye H. The stress of life. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  121. Waldrop AE, Resick PA. Coping among adult female victims of domestic violence. J Fam Violence. 2004;19(5):291–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Lazarus RS. Coping theory and research: past, present, and future. J Psychosom Med. 1993;55:224–34.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Itimi K, Dienye PO, Gbeneol PK. Intimate partner violence and associated coping strategies among women in a primary care clinic in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. J Family Med Prim Care. 2014;3(3):193–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. Kearney MH. Enduring love: a grounded formal theory of women’s experience of domestic violence. Res Nurs Health. 2001;24(4):270–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Landenburger K. A process of entrapment in and recovery from an abusive relationship. Issues Mental Health Nurs. 1989;10:209–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. Geller PA. Pregnancy as a stressful life event. CNS Spectr. 2004;9:188–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Chrousos GP, Torpy MB, Gold PW. Interactions between the hypothalamic-pituitary- adrenal axis and the female reproductive system: clinical implications. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:229–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Glynn LM, Dunkel-Schetter C, Wadhwa PD, Sandman CA. Pregnancy affects appraisal of negative life events. J Psychosom Res. 2002;56:47–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Barnyard VL, Graham-Berman SA. Can women hope? A gender analysis of theories of coping with stress. Psychol Women Q. 1993;17:303–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Myors K, Johnson L, Langdon R. Coping styles of pregnancy adolescents. Public Health Nurs. 2001;18:24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  131. Huizink AC, De Medina PG, Mulder EJ, Visser GH, Buitelaar JK. Coping in normal pregnancy. Ann Behav Med. 2002;4:132–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. McCaw B, Berman W, Syme S, Hunkeler E. Beyond screening for domestic violence: a systems model approach in a managed care setting. Am J Prev Med. 2001;21(3):170–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Colombini M, Dockerty C, Mayhew SH. Barriers and facilitators to integrating health service responses to intimate partner violence in low- and middle-income countries: a comparative health systems and service analysis. Stud Fam Plann. 2017;48(2):179–200.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety Limited (ANROWS). Meta-evaluation of existing interagency partnerships, collaboration, coordination and/or integrated interventions and service responses to violence against women: state of knowledge paper. Sydney: ANROWS; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Armstrong R, Doyle J, Lamb C, Waters E. Multi-sectoral health promotion and public health: the role of evidence. J Public Health. 2006;28(2):168–172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Nowell B, Froster-Fishman P. Examining multi-sector community collaborative as vehicles for building organizational capacity. Am J Community Psychol. 2011;48:193–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Buffardi AL, Cabello R, Garcia PJ. Toward greater inclusion: lessons from Peru in confronting challenges of multi-sector collaboration. Pan Am J Public Health. 2012;32(3):245–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Report. Multisector interagency initiatives addressing commercial sexual exploitation and sex trafficking of minors. In: Confronting commercial sexual exploitation and sex trafficking of minors in the United States: a guide for the legal sector. USA: Institute of Medicine/National Research Council, The National Academies of Science; 2014. p. 31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Ministry of Women and Child Development (MWCD). One stop centre scheme. Implementation guidelines for State Governments/UT Administrations. New Delhi: MWCD, Government of India; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  140. Deosthali P, Maghnani P, Malik S. Establishing Dilassa: documenting the challenges. Mumbai: Centre for Enquiry into Health and Allied Themes (CEHAT); 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  141. Kerala Women. Health & family welfare. 2012. Retrieved on 23 Sept 2016, from http://www.keralawomen.gov.in/index.php/government-departments/122-health-family-welfare.

  142. National Rural Health Mission. Meeting people’s health needs in rural areas. Framework of implementation 2005–2012. New Delhi: GOI; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meerambika Mahapatro .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mahapatro, M. (2018). Health-Care Provisions and Responses in Practice Settings. In: Domestic Violence and Health Care in India. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6159-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6159-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6158-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6159-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics