Abstract
This chapter summarized the major results of the Longitudinal Survey of Psychoactive Drug Abusers in Hong Kong conducted during 2009–2012, which collected data at six time points from a sample of active or former psychoactive drug abusers. Qualitative data obtained from several focus group sessions were also used to interpret some of the significant relationships among the variables. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings were examined. The findings were also compared to those of another longitudinal study, entitled “Longitudinal Study of Chronic Drug Abusers in Hong Kong”, conducted in 2000–2003, thereby highlighting some of the characteristics of the changes of the Hong Kong drug scene over two generations of drug abusers. Several major limitations of the study were also discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Other weaknesses of the normalization thesis include (i) failure to consider the influence of social structural factors, such as socioeconomic and cultural conditions, social networks, and law enforcement, on the extent and patterns of normalization among different youth groups and (ii) tendency to exaggerate the extent of social and cultural accommodation of recreational drug use (Fitzgerald et al. 2013; Williams 2016). As normalization varies in terms of extent and with the types of drugs used by different youth groups, some scholars preferred the term “differentiated normalization ” (Shildrick 2002; Shiner and Newburn 1997) to the simplistic and uniform view of normalization in youth drug use. MacDonald and Marsh’s (2002) study of youth in a socially exclude neighbourhood in Northeast England showed that abstinence, recreational use, and problematic use coexisted. In Hong Kong, Cheung and Cheung’s (2006) finding that normalization was limited to marginal youths rather than a widespread phenomenon in the whole youth population is another example of differentiated normalization.
References
Aldridge, J., Measham, F., & Willams, L. (2011). Illegal leisure revisited: Changing patterns of alcohol and drug use in adolescents and young adults. New York: Routledge.
Asbridge, M., Valleriani, J., Kwok, J., & Erickson, P. G. (2016). Normalization and denormalization in different legal contexts: Comparing cannabis and tobacco. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 23(3), 212–223.
Alexander, B. (2008). The globalization of addiction: A study in poverty of the spirit. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Becker, H. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free Press.
Cheung, N. W. T., & Cheung, Y. W. (2006). Is Hong Kong experiencing normalization of adolescent drug use? Some reflections on the normalization thesis. Substance Use & Misuse, 41(14), 1967–1990.
Cheung, Y. W. (1997). Family, school, peer and media predictors of adolescent deviant behavior in Hong Kong. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26(5), 569–596.
Cheung, Y. W. (2009). A brighter side: Protective and risk factors in the rehabilitation of chronic drug abusers in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
Cheung, Y. W. (2012). A longitudinal survey of psychoactive drug abusers in Hong Kong. Report submitted to Beat Drugs Fund, Narcotics Division, Security Bureau, Government of the Hong Kong SAR. In website of Narcotics Division: http://www.nd.gov.hk/pdf/Longitudinal%20Survey%20of%20Psychoactive%20Drug%20Abusers%20in%20Hong%20Kong%20-%20report.pdf. Access date: April 9, 2017.
Cheung, Y. W., & Zhong, S. H. (2014). Official reactions to crime and drug problems in Hong Kong. In C. Liqun, I. Sun, & B. Hebenton (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Chinese Criminology (pp. 295–308). Oxon: Routledge.
Fitzgerald, R., Mazerolle, L., & Mazerolle, P. (2013). Drug normalization and Australian youth: Group differences in the social accommodation of drug use. Journal of Youth Studies, 16, 901–915.
Hathaway, A., Comeau, N., & Erickson, P. (2011). Cannabis normalization and stigma: Contemporary practices of moral regulation. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 11, 451–469.
Hser, Y. I., Longshore, D., & Anglin, M. D. (2007). The life course perspective on drug use: A conceptual framework for understanding drug use trajectories. Evaluation Review, 31(6), 515–547.
Hunt, G., Moloney, M., & Evans, K. (2007). Drug use and meanings of risk and pleasure. Journal of Youth Studies, 10(1), 73–96.
Johnson, R. E. (1979). Juvenile delinquency and its origins: An integrated theoretical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jones, S. P., & Heaven, P. C. L. (1998). Psychosocial correlates of adolescent drug-taking behaviour. Journal of Adolescence, 21(2), 127–134.
MacDonald, R., & Marsh, J. (2002). Crossing the Rubicon: Youth transitions, poverty, drugs and social exclusion. International Journal of Drug Policy, 13, 27–38.
Maggs, J. L., Wray-Lake, L., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2013). Developmental risk taking and the natural history of alcohol and drug use among youth. In P. M. Miller (Ed.), Principles of addiction: Comprehensive addictive behaviors and disorders (pp. 535–544). New York: Elsevier.
Matza, D. (1964). Delinquency and drift. New York: Wiley.
Moore, S., Laflin, M. T., & Weis, D. L. (1996). The role of cultural norms in the self-esteem and drug use relationship. Adolescence, 31, 523–542.
Parker, H., Aldridge, J., & Measham, F. (1998). Illegal leisure: The normalization of adolescent recreational drug use. London: Routledge.
Pennay, A. E., & Moore, D. (2010). Exploring the micro-politics of normalization: Narratives of pleasure, self-control and desire in a sample of young Australian ‘party drug’ users. Addiction Research and Theory, 18, 557–571.
Shildrick, T. (2002). Young people, illicit drug use and the question of normalization. Journal of Youth Studies, 5, 35–48.
Shiner, M., & Newburn, T. (1997). Definitely, maybe not? The normalization of recreational drug use amongst young people. Sociology, 31, 511–529.
Singer, E. O., & Schensul, J. J. (2011). Negotiating ecstasy risk, reward, and control: A qualitative analysis of drug management patterns among ecstasy-using urban young adults. Substance Use & Misuse, 46, 1675–1689.
Sykes, G., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization. American Sociological Review, 22, 664–670.
Sznitman, S. R. (2008). Drug normalization and the case of Sweden. Contemporary Drug Problems, 35, 447–580.
Thio, A. (2010). Deviant behavior (10th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Williams, L. (2016). Muddy waters?: Reassessing the dimensions of the normalization thesis in twenty-first century Britain. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 23(3), 190–201.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cheung, Y.W., Cheung, N.Wt. (2018). Summary and Discussion. In: Psychoactive Drug Abuse in Hong Kong. Quality of Life in Asia, vol 11. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6154-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6154-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6152-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6154-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)