Disasters Across Borders: Borderlands as Spaces of Hope and Innovation in the Geopolitics of Environmental Disasters

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter builds on Chris Rumford’s (Political Geography, 30, 67–8, 2011) proposal that we shift our emphasis from “seeing like a state” to “seeing like a border”. This entails thinking of borders as spaces in their own right (including “spaces of hope”); recognizing “bordering” activity as equally the business of state and non-state actors (NGOs, ordinary citizens); and treating “borderlands” as dynamic sites of discursive contestation and claims-making. Political geographers have identified a disjuncture between the notion of a borderless world in an age of globalization and the reality of state borders that are rapidly hardening due to economic protectionism, competition over new sources of petrochemical and mineral resources, anti-immigration sentiments, and concerns over terrorism. This is very much the case for the Asia Pacific region, which has become increasingly central to global commerce, politics and security. How then can inclusive and collaborative disaster governance networks and structures that extend across national borders be successfully created and sustained? To provide insight into the challenges of governing environmental disasters extending across national borders, the chapter draws upon recent research on sovereignty claims and clashes (especially in the Arctic, South China Sea and the Indian Ocean), transnational ocean governance, and escalating threats to deep sea and coastal ecosystems from overfishing, oil and gas drilling, underwater mining, and global climate change.

Keywords

Borderlands Cross-border disasters Environmental geopolitics Globalization Transboundary governance 

References

  1. Attinà, F. (2012). Disaster and emerging policies at the international and social systems levels. In F. Attinà (Ed.), The politics and policies of relief, aid and reconstruction (pp. 21–41). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barker, V (2016). Reflections on Dutch border practices. Border Criminologies blog, University of Oxford, Faculty of Law, 18 March, https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/research-subject-groups/centre-criminology/centreborder-criminologies/blog/2016/02/reflections-dutch.
  3. Basu, P. (2012). Aftermath of dams and displacement in India’s Narmada River Valley: Linking compensation policies with experiences of resettlement. In R. Ganguly-Scrase & K. Lahiri-Dutt (Eds.), Rethinking displacement: Asia Pacific perspectives (pp. 95–114). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  4. Chintraruck, A., & Walsh, J. (2016). Bangkok and the floods of 2011: Urban governance and the struggle for democratisation. In M. A. Miller & M. Douglass (Eds.), Disaster governance in urbanising Asia (pp. 195–209). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clifford, R. A. (1955). Informal group actions in the Rio Grande flood: A report to the committee on disaster studies. Washington DC: National Research Council.Google Scholar
  6. Cowen, D. (2010). Containing insecurity: Logistic space, U.S. port cities, and the ‘war on terror’. In S. Graham (Ed.), Disrupted cities: When infrastructure fails (pp. 69–83). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Cunningham, H. (2004). Nations rebound. Crossing borders in a gated globe. Identities, 11(3), 329–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cuny, F. C. (1983). Disasters and development. New York: Oxford University Press/Oxfam America.Google Scholar
  9. Douglass, M. (2016). The urban transition of disaster governance in Asia. In M. A. Miller & M. Douglass (Eds.), Disaster governance in urbanising Asia (pp. 13–43). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Edwards, F. L. (2009). Effective disaster response in cross-border events. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 17(4), 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fendt, L. (2010). Argentina revives longtime border dispute with Chile in the Patagonian ice fields. Santiago Times, 20 May.Google Scholar
  12. Forman, J. M., & White, S. (2011). The Dominican response to the Haiti earthquake: A neighbor’s journey. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic & International Studies.Google Scholar
  13. Ganguly-Scrase, R. (2012). Neoliberal development and displacement: Women’s experiences of flight and settlement in South Asia. In R. Ganguly-Scrase & K. Lahiri-Dutt (Eds.), Rethinking displacement: Asia Pacific perspectives. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  14. Ganguly-Scrase, R., & Lahiri-Dutt, K. (2012). Dispossession, placelessness, home and belonging: An outline of a research agenda. In R. Ganguly-Scrase & K. Lahiri-Dutt (Eds.), Rethinking displacement: Asia Pacific perspectives (pp. 3–29). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  15. Green, S. (1977). International disaster relief: Towards a responsive system. New York: McGraw Hill/Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar
  16. Haase, T. (2010). International disaster resilience: Preparing for transnational disaster. In L. K. Comfort, A. Boin, & C. C. Demchak (Eds.), Designing resilience: Preparing for extreme events (pp. 220–243). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hannigan, J. (2011). Implacable foes or strange bedfellows? The promise and pitfalls of econationalism in a globalized world. In T. W. Harrison & S. Drakulic (Eds.), Against orthodoxy: Studies in nationalism (pp. 314–332). Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hannigan, J. (2012). Disasters without borders: The international politics of natural disasters. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hannigan, J. (2016). The geopolitics of deep oceans. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hicks, E., & Pappas, G. (2006). Coordinating disaster relief after the south Asian earthquake. Society, 43(5), 42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Horstmann, A. (2002). Dual ethnic minorities and the local reworking of citizenship at the Thailand-Malaysian border. CIBR Working Papers in Border Studies, no. CIBR/WP02–3, http://www.qub.ac.uk/cibr/WPpdffiles/CIBRwp2002_3_rev.pdf.
  22. Hortsmann, A., & Wadley, R. L. (2006). Introduction. In A. Hortsmann & R. L. Wadley (Eds.), Centering the margin: Agency and narrative in Asian borderlands (pp. 1–26). New York: Bergdahn Books.Google Scholar
  23. Kalin, W & Schrepfer, N 2012, Protecting people crossing borders in the context of climate change. Normative gaps and possible approaches. United Nations High Commission for Refugees, Geneva. February, http://www.unher.org/protect.
  24. Kelly, P. M., & Adger, W. N. (2000). Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Climatic Change, 45, 5–17.Google Scholar
  25. Kelman, I. (2011). Disaster diplomacy: How disasters affect peace and conflict. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Kent, R. C. (1987). Anatomy of disaster relief: The international network in action. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. Kihato, C. W. (2017). The liminal city: Gender, mobility and governance in a twenty-first century African city. In J. Hannigan & G. Richards (Eds.), The handbook of new urban studies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Kolossov, V. (2005). Border studies: Changing perspectives and theoretical approaches. Geopolitics, 10(4), 606–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kristensen, K., & Wooding, B. (2013). Haiti/Dominican Republic: Upholding the rights of immigrants and their descendants. Oslo: Norwegian Peacebuilding Resource Centre.Google Scholar
  30. Lipschutz, R. (1999). Bioregionalism, civil society and global environmental governance. In M. V. McGinnis (Ed.), Bioregionalism (pp. 101–119). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Little, R. G. (2010). Managing the risk of cascading failure in complex urban infrastructures. In S. Graham (Ed.), Disrupted cities: When infrastructure fails (pp. 27–39). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Miller, M. A., & Douglass, M. (2015). Introduction: Decentralizing disaster governance in urbanizing Asia. Habitat International, 52, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller, M. A., & Douglass, M. (2016). Disaster governance in an urbanising world region. In M. A. Miller & M. Douglass (Eds.), Disaster governance in urbanising Asia (pp. 1–12). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mountz, A (2011). Border politics: Spatial provision and geographical precision. In: Johnson, C., Jones, R., Paasi, A., Amoore, L., Mountz, A., Salter, M., & Rumford, C. (eds.), Interve ntions on rethinking ‘the border’ in border studies. Political Geography, vol. 30, pp. 65–6.Google Scholar
  35. Paasi, A. (2011). Borders, theory and the challenge of relational thinking. In: Johnson, C., Jones, R., Paasi, A., Amoore, L., Mountz, A., Salter, M., & Rumford, C. (Eds.), Interventions on rethinking ‘the border’ in border studies. Political Geography, vol. 30, pp. 62–3.Google Scholar
  36. Palet, L.S. (2016) Giusy Nicolini: Governing at the world’s most dangerous border, OZY, 12 March, http://www.ozy.com/rising-stars/giusy-nicolini-governing-at-the-worlds-most-dangerous-border/60218.
  37. Rumford, C 2011, Seeing like a border. In: Johnson, C., Jones, R., Paasi, A., Amoore, L., Mountz, A., Salter, M., & Rumford, C., Interventions on rethinking ‘the border’ in border studies. Political Geography, vol. 30, 67–8.Google Scholar
  38. Stoddard, ER (1961). Catastrophe and crisis in a flooded border community: An analytical approach to disaster emergence. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  39. Stoddard, E. R. (1969). The U.S. Mexican border as a research laboratory. Journal of Inter-American Studies, 11(3), 477–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Susskind, L. E. (1994). Environmental diplomacy: Negotiating more effective global agreements. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Van Schendel, W., & De Maaker, E. (2014). Introduction to the special issue: Asian borderlands: Introducing their permeability, strategic uses and meanings. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 29(1), 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wachtendorf, T. (2009). Trans-system social ruptures: Exploring issues of vulnerability and resiliency. Review of Policy Research, 26(4), 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zen-Ruffinen, B. & Pfeifer, H.R. (2013) Coastal waters in arid climate: a ‘natural chemical risk’ for sustainable land management and public health. Paper delivered at the Workshop, Linking Sustainable Development, Global Migration, Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Reduction, Faculty of Geosciences and Environment, The University of Lausanne, Switzerland, http://www3.unil.ch/wpmu/dixansfgse/workshop.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations