Advertisement

Zaps and Taps: Solar Storms, Electricity and Water Supply Disasters, and Governance

  • Robert James Wasson
Chapter

Abstract

Large geomagnetic storms originate in the sun and have disrupted satellite operations and shut down electricity grids with impacts on communications, transportation, financial services, navigation, emergency services, hospitals, and water supply. So far these impacts have been localized and did not last for more than a few days. However, when the 1859 Carrington storm (or a larger storm) is repeated the impacts could be global and last for many months to years. Failure of electricity grids will impact water supply and quality leading to impacts on households, agriculture and industry. Cross-border issues will arise where power lines move electricity between countries, such as in mainland SE Asia and China, and increasingly in S Asia. A major storm could lead to social disruption and migration across borders as food and water supplies dwindle, and also nuclear reactor meltdowns with widespread fallout. The calculated return period of a Carrington-scale event is 150 years and for smaller storms 35–70 years. An existing global monitoring system can provide some hours of warning that will allow vital facilities to be protected, but the monitoring system needs to be improved. Transformers will be destroyed without “hardening” by installing line series capacitors on transmission lines connecting at least critical facilities; but this will be financially challenging in less developed nations. Vulnerability assessments are lacking, as are operational management strategies. Less national and international interconnectedness of grids may also be required. These and other governance challenges will be emphasized.

Keywords

Geomagnetic storms Electricity distribution Cross-border disaster governance Global monitoring systems Vulnerability assessments 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank my wife Merrilyn for inadvertently alerting me to the threat of solar storms, Michael Douglass and Michelle Miller for the invitation to write this chapter and their patience with my slowness, Karl Kim for encouraging my approach, and Sarah Starkweather for excellent editing. David Nott is thanked for advice on probability calculations. The project benefited from the financial support of a Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 2 grant entitled ‘Governing Compound Disasters in Urbanising Asia’ (MOE2014-T2–1-017).

References

  1. Akasofu, S. I. (2002). Exploring the secrets of the Aurora. New York: Kluwer Academic Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alekseev, D., Kuvshinov, A., & Palshin, N. (2015). Compilation of 3D global conductivity model of the earth for space weather applications. Earth, Planets and Space, 67(7), 108–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews-Speed, P. (2016). Connecting ASEAN through the power grid: Next steps. Policy Brief 11, Energy Studies Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore, viewed 30 Apr 2016, http://esi.nus.edu.sg/docs/default-source/doc/esi-policy-brief-11---connecting-asean-through-the-power-grid-next-steps.pdf?sfvrsn=0.
  4. Anthony, S. (2014). The solar storm of 2012 that almost sent us back to a post-apocalyptic Stone Age. Extreme Technology, viewed 25 Apr 2016, http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/186805-the-solar-storm-of-2012-that-almost-sent-us-back-to-a-post-apocalyptic-stone-age.
  5. ASEAN Power Grid Consultative Committee (2015). Energy regulatory commission ERC forum: ASEAN Power Grid, Road to Multilateral Power Trading. Retrieved 30 Apr 2016, http://www.energyforum2015.com/download/Session1-1present.pdf.
  6. Barabási, A. L. (2002). Linked: The new science of networks. New York: Perseus Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Barbosa, C. S., Hartmann, G. A., & Pinhheiro, K. J. (2015). Numerical modeling of geomagnetically induced currents in a Brazilian transmission line. Advances in Space Research, 55(4), 1168–1179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barnard, L., Lockwood, M., Hapgood, M. A., Owens, M. J., Davis, C. J., & Steinhilber, F. (2011). Predicting space climate change. Geophysical Research Letters, 38(16). doi: 10.1029/2011GL048489.
  9. Bartley, W.H. (2002). Life cycle management of utility transformer assets. (http://www.imia.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/EP14-2003-LifeCycleManagement-Utility-Transformers.pdf; retrieved 1/09/2016).
  10. Beer, J., McCracken, K., & von Steiger, R. (2012). Cosmogenic radionuclides. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Benfield, A. (2013). Geomagnetic storms. Sydney: Aon Benfield Analytics.Google Scholar
  12. Bolduc, L. (2002). GIC observations and studies in the Hydro-Québec power system. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar – Terrestrial Physics, 64(16), 1793–1802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boteler, D. H., Pirjola, R. J., & Nevanlinna, H. (1998). The effects of geomagnetic disturbances on electrical systems at the Earth’s surface. Advances in Space Research, 22(1), 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Byrd, D. (2013). Proposed step to help society prepare for a solar storm disaster. EarthSky, viewed 25 Apr 2016, http://earthsky.org/space/can-the-july-2012-solar-storm-help-society-prepare-for-disaster.
  15. Caraballo, R., Bettucci, L. S., & Tancredi, G. (2013). Geomagnetically induced currents in the Uruguayan high-voltage power grid. Geophysics Journal International, 195(2), 844–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carter, B. A., Yizengaw, E., Pradipta, R., Halford, A. J., Norman, R., & Zhang, K. (2015). Interplanetary shocks and the resulting geomagnetically induced currents at the equator. Geophysical Research Letters, 42(16), 6554–6559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clark, S. (2007). The sun kings: The unexpected tragedy of Richard Carrington and the tale of how modern astronomy began. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Corbin, R.B. (2012). The challenges of replacing a failed transformer. Fast Track Power, 26 Feb, viewed 18 Apr 2016, http://fasttrackpower.com/the-challenges-of-replacing-a-failed-transformer/.
  19. CRO Forum (2011). Power blackout risks: Risk management options. Emerging Risk Initiative—Position Paper, CRO Forum, Amstelveen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  20. Dhakal, S., Shrestha, S., Shrestha, A., Kansal, A., Kaneko, S. (2015). Towards a better water-energy-carbon nexus in cities. APN Global Change Perspectives Policy Brief No. LCD-01, Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change Research, Kobe.Google Scholar
  21. Eather, R. H. (1980). Majestic lights: The aurora in science, history and the arts. Washington, DC: The American Geophysical Union.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Economic Consulting Associates. (2010). The potential of regional power sector integration. London: Economic Consulting Associates. retrieved 30 April 2016, http://www.esmap.org/sites/esmap.org/files/BN004-10_REISP-CD_The%20Potential%20of%20Regional%20Power%20Sector%20Integration-Literature%20Review.pdf.Google Scholar
  23. Gaunt, C. T. (2014). Reducing uncertainties—responses for electricity utilities to severe solar storms. Journal Space Weather Space Climate, 4(A01), 1–7. doi: 10.1051/swsc/2013058.Google Scholar
  24. Glachant, J. M., & Lévêque, F. (2009). Electricity reform in Europe: Towards a single market. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Helbing, D. (2013). Globally networked risks and how to respond. Nature, 497, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heylen, E., Van Hertem, D. (2014). Importance and difficulties of comparing reliability criteria and the assessment of reliability. IEEE Young Researchers Symposium, Gent, 24–25 Apr, retrieved 27 Apr 2016, https://lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/123456789/451702/1/YRS2014_EH_DVH.pdf.
  27. Hines, P., Balasubramaniam, K., & Sanchez, E. C. (2009). Cascading failures in power grids. IEEE Potentials, 28(5), 24–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). (2015). Guide for establishing power transformer capability while under geomagnetic disturbances. Piscataway: IEEE Standard C57.163–2015, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Standards Association.Google Scholar
  29. International Telecommunications Union (1992). World Atlas of ground conductivities. Retrieved 26 Apr 2016, https://www.itu.int/dms_pubrec/itu-r/rec/p/R-REC-P.832-2-199907-S!!PDF-E.pdf.
  30. Kappenman, J. (2010). Geomagnetic storms and their impacts on the U.S. Power Grid. Meta-R-319, Metatech Corporation, retrieved 27 Apr 2016, http://fas.org/irp/eprint/geomag.pdf.
  31. Kataoka, R. (2013). Probability of occurrence of extreme solar storms. Space Weather, 11(5), 214–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kenway, S.J., Priestley, A., Cook, S., Seo, S., Inman, M., Gregory, A., Hall, M. (2008). Energy use in the provision and consumption of urban water in Australia and New Zealand, water for a healthy Country Flagship Report Series, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and Water Services Association of Australia, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  33. Kovaltsov, G. A., & Usoskin, I. G. (2014). Occurrence probability of large solar energetic particle events: Assessment from data on cosmogenic radionuclides in lunar rocks. Solar Physics, 289(1), 211–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lakhina, G. S., & Tsurutani, B. T. (2016). Geomagnetic storms: Historical perspective to modern view. Geoscience Letters, 3(5), 1–11. doi: 10.1186/s40562-016-0037-4.Google Scholar
  35. Langbein, F. (2014). Natural catastrophe: A solar superstorm—what if? Asia Insurance Review, October, viewed 26 Apr 2016, http://www.asiainsurancereview.com/Magazine/ReadMagazineArticle?aid=35552.
  36. Little, R. G. (2002). Controlling cascading failure: Understanding the vulnerabilities of interconnected infrastructures. Journal of Urban Technology, 9(1), 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liu, Y. D., Li, Y., & Pirjola, R. (2014a). Observations and modeling of GIC in the Chinese large-scale high-voltage power networks. Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate, 4(A03), 1–7. doi: 10.1051/swsc/2013057.Google Scholar
  38. Liu, Y. D., Luhmann, J. G., Kajdic, P., Kilpua, E. K. J., Lugaz, N., Nitta, N. V., Mösti, C., Lavraud, B., Bale, S. D., Farrugia, C. J., & Galvin, A. B. (2014b). Observations of an extreme storm in interplanetary space caused by successive coronal mass ejections. Nature Communications, 5, 1–8. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4481.Google Scholar
  39. Lloyd’s. (2013). Solar storm risk to the north American electric grid. London: Lloyd’s.Google Scholar
  40. Lorenz, J., Battiston, S., & Schweitzer, F. (2009). Systemic risk in a unifying framework for cascading processes on networks. European Physical Journal B, 71, 441–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Love, J. J. (2012). Credible occurrence probabilities for extreme geophysical events: Earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, magnetic storms. Geophysical Research Letters, 39(10), 1–6. doi: 10.1029/2012GLO51431.Google Scholar
  42. Lühr, H., Maus, S., & Rother, M. (2004). Noon-time equatorial electrojet: Its spatial features as determined by the CHAMP satellite. Journal of Geophysical Research, 109(A1), 01306. doi: 10.1029/2002JA009656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marusek, J.A. (2007). Solar storm threat analysis. Unpublished white paper. Impact. Retrieved 25 Apr 2016, http://projectcamelot.org/Solar_Storm_Threat_Analysis_James_Marusek_Impact_2007.pdf.
  44. Menck, P. J., Heitzig, J., Kurths, J., & Schellnhuber, H. J. (2014). How dead ends undermine power grid stability. Nature Communications, 5, 1–8. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mitchell, M. (2009). Complexity: A guided tour. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Mukherjee. (2015). Northern India power grid failure due to extraterrestrial changes. Earth Science and Climatic Change, 6, 261–262.Google Scholar
  47. National Academy of Sciences. (2004). Severe space weather storms October 19–November 7, 2003. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  48. National Research Council. (2008). Severe space weather events: Understanding societal and economic impacts. A workshop Repor. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  49. Newell, B., Marsh, D. M., & Sharma, D. (2011). Enhancing the resilience of the Australian national electricity market: Taking a systems approach in policy development. Ecology and Society, 16(2), 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ngwira, C. M., Pulkkinen, A., Mays, M. L., Kuznetsova, M. M., Galvin, A. B., Simunac, K., Baker, D. N., Li, X., Zheng, Y., & Glocer, A. (2013). Simulation of the 23 July 2012 extreme space weather event: What if this extremely rare CME was earth directed? Space Weather, 11(12), 671–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. North American Electric Reliability Corporation. (2012). Special reliability assessment. Interim report. Effects of geomagnetic disturbances on the bulk power system. Atlanta: NERC. 137 pp.Google Scholar
  52. Novotny, V. (2012). Water and energy link in the cities of the future-achieving net zero carbon and pollution emissions footprint. In V. Lazarova, K. H. Choo, & P. Cornel (Eds.), Water-energy interactions in water reuse. London: IWA Publishing.Google Scholar
  53. Office of Energy Delivery and Electric Reliability. (2012). Large power transformers and the U.S. electric grid. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy. http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/Large%20Power%20Transformer%20Study%20-%20June%202012_0.pdf.Google Scholar
  54. Omatola, K. M., & Okeme, I. C. (2012). Impacts of solar storms on energy and communications technologies. Archives of Applied Science Research, 4(4), 1825–1832.Google Scholar
  55. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/International Futures Programme [OECD/IFP] (2011). Geomagnetic Storms, OECD/IFP Futures Project on ‘Future Global Shocks’, retrieved 30 Apr 2016, http://www.oecd.org/gov/risk/46891645.pdf.
  56. Pulkkinen, A., Bernabeu, E., Eichner, J., Beggan, C., & Thomson, A. W. P. (2012). Generation of 100-year geomagnetically induced current scenarios. Space Weather, 10(4), 1–19. doi: 10.1029/2011SW000750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pulkkinen, A., Hesse, M., Habib, S., Van der Zel, L., Damsky, B., Policelli, F., Fugate, D., Jacobs, W., & Creamer, E. (2010). Solar shield: Forecasting and mitigating space weather effects on high-voltage power transmission systems. Natural Hazards, 53(2), 333–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pulkkinen, A., Pirjola, R., & Viljanen, A. (2007). Determination of ground conductivity and system parameters for optimal modeling of geomagnetically induced current flow in technological systems. Earth, Planets and Space, 59(9), 999–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Riley, P. (2012). On the probability of occurrence of extreme space weather events. Space Weather, 10(2), 1–12. doi: 10.1029/2011SW000734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shea, M. A., Smart, D. F., McCracken, K. G., Dreschoff, G. A. A. M., & Spence, H. E. (2006). Solar proton events for 450 years: The Carrington event in perspective. Advances in Space Research, 38(2), 232–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Singh, A., Jamash, T., Nepal, R., & Toman, M. (2015). Cross-border electricity cooperation in South Asia, Policy Research Working Paper 7328. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: SystemsTthinking and modeling for a complex world. Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  63. Stothers, R. (1979). Magnetic Cepheids. The Astrophysical Journal, 234, 257–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Townsend, L. W., Stephens, D. L., Jr., Zapp, E. N., Hoff, J. L., Moussa, H. M., Miller, T. M., Campbell, C. E., & Nichols, T. F. (2006). The Carrington event: Possible doses to crews in space from a comparable event. Advances in Space Research, 38(2), 226–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. United States International Trade Commission. (2012). Large power transformers in Korea: Investigation no. 731-TA-1189 (preliminary)., Publication 4346. Washington, DC: USITC.Google Scholar
  66. Usoskin, I. G., & Kovalstsov, G. A. (2012). Occurrence of extreme solar particle events: Assessment from historical proxy data. The Astronomical Journal, 757(1), 1–6.Google Scholar
  67. Vasyliunas, V. M. (2011). The largest imaginable magnetic storm. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 73(11–12), 1444–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vergetis, B. (2016). Dire, dire hair on fire: read this for the real risks GIC poses to the grid. SmartGridNews, 7 Mar, viewed, 30 April 2016, http://www.smartgridnews.com/story/dire-dire-hair-fire-read-real-risks-gic-poses-grid/2016-03-07.
  69. Water Innovations Alliance (2012). White Paper: The Water Smart Grid Initiative. Retrieved 29 Apr 2016, http://www.waterinnovations.org/PDF/WP_water_smart_grid.pdf.
  70. Wilkinson, R. (2011). The water-energy nexus: Methodologies, challenges and opportunities. In D. S. Kenney & R. Wilkinson (Eds.), The water-energy nexus in the American west (pp. 3–17). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  71. Zheng, K., Boteler, D., Pirjola, R. J., Liu, L. G., Becker, R., Marti, L., Boutilier, S., & Guillon, S. (2014). Effects of system characteristics on geomagnetically induced currents. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 29(2), 890–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Water Policy, Lee Kuan Yew School of Public PolicyNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations