Pyrolytic Characterization and Kinetic Analysis of Camellia sinensis (Tea) Seed Deoiled Cake

  • Nabajit Dev ChoudhuryEmail author
  • Bichitra Bikash
  • Rupam Kataki
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Energy book series (SPE)


The knowledge of kinetic parameters is essential for modeling of the reactor and for optimization of the process conditions. In the present work, the first attempt was made to investigate the thermal behavior and to calculate the kinetic parameters of Camellia sinensis deoiled cake (CSDC) using thermogravimetric analysis. The pyrolysis experiments were conducted in temperatures ranging from 298 to 1273 K under inert atmosphere utilizing two different heating rates of 10 and 40 K min−1, respectively. On the basis of thermogravimetric analysis, activation energy (E), pre-exponential factor (A) for the active pyrolysis zone of the deoiled cake were calculated, respectively, by Arrhenius, Coast–Redfern and Flynn-Wall-Ozawa methods for the heating rates of 10 and 40 K min−1. These results can provide useful information to predict kinetic model of CSDC pyrolysis and optimization of the process conditions. The activation energy was found in the range of 54–77 kJ mol−1 for heating rates of 10 and 40 K min−1, respectively. The results derived are useful for preliminary assessment of C. sinensis seed deoiled cake as potential feedstock for thermal conversion.


Pyrolysis Deoiled cake TGA Kinetics 


  1. 1.
    Gottipati R, Mishra S (2011) A kinetic study on pyrolysis and combustion characteristics of oil cakes: effect of cellulose and lignin content. J Fuel Chem Technol 39:265–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chutia RS, Phukan MM, Kataki R, Bhaskar T, Konwar BK (2016) Exploitation of Pongamia glabra deoiled cake for alternate energy: physico-chemical characterization and thermogravimetric studies. Energy Source Part A: Recovery Util Environ Eff 38:29–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vlaev LT, Markovska IG, Lyubchev LA (2003) Non-isothermal kinetics of pyrolysis of rice husk. Thermochim Acta 406:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hu S, Jess A, Xu M (2007) Kinetic study of Chinese biomass slow pyrolysis: comparison of different kinetic models. Fuel 86:2778–2788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morris KW, Johnson WL (2000) In: 1st world conference on biomass for energy and industry, James and James (Science publishers), Sevilla, pp 1519–1524Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McKendry P (2002) Energy production from biomass: overview of biomass. Bioresour Technol 83:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Quan C, Li A, Gao N (2009) Thermogravimetric analysis and kinetic study on large particles of printed circuit board wastes. Waste Manag 29:2353–2360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Di Blasi C (2008) Modeling chemical and physical processes of wood and biomass pyrolysis. Prog Energy Combust Sci 34:47–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nabajit Dev Choudhury
    • 1
    Email author
  • Bichitra Bikash
    • 1
  • Rupam Kataki
    • 2
  1. 1.Assam Down Town UniversityGuwahatiIndia
  2. 2.Department of EnergyTezpur UniversityTezpurIndia

Personalised recommendations