Advertisement

Partial Replacement of Aggregates Using Agricultural Waste in Concrete Manufacturing

  • Ranjeet SinghEmail author
  • Amit Arora
  • Gurmit Singh
  • Anand K. Tyagi
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Energy book series (SPE)

Abstract

The environmental waste management practices are picking up across the world day by day. The present work deals with scientific disposal of the Agriculture waste material (rice straws) by utilizing them as coarse aggregate in conventional concrete mix. In order to reduce the alarmingly adverse effects of this waste material on the environment, it has become utmost necessary to get rid of it wisely so that the disposal may not affect the environment. The incorporation of this solid wastes in M15 grade concrete mix as partial replacements to coarse aggregate is found to yield an alternative lightweight eco-friendly concrete. The compressive strength of rice straws reinforced concrete sample with 10% replacement found out to be 10.2 N/mm2 which is 68% as compared to conventional concrete i.e., M15 (15 N/mm2). This waste utilization cum management practice makes the possibility of embedding the agriculture waste material into concrete, providing us a good sustainable, economical and lightweight alternative environment friendly construction material.

Keywords

Compressive strength Agriculture waste Rice straws Reinforced concrete 

References

  1. 1.
    Adam B, Richard G, Robert B (2005) A tale of two market failure; technology and environmental policy. TCE 54:164–174Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bedi R, Chanda R (2013) Mechanical properties of polymer concrete. J Compos 17:42–61Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Darji A, Patel I, Shah J (2014) Effects of green supplementary material on engineering properties of recycled aggregate concrete. JCEET 1(4):1–4Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ganesan K, Rajgopal K, Thangavel K (2007) Evaluation of bagasse ash as supplementary cementious material, ecological economics. Cement Concr Compos, JCCC 29:515–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kumar RS (2012) Experimental study of the properties of concrete made with alternate construction materials. IJMER 2(5):3006–3012Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Poveda CA, Young R (2015) Potential benefits of developing and implementing environmental and sustainability rating system; making the case for the need for diversification. IJSBE 4(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sarath Chandra Kumar B et al (2004) Sustainable development using supplementary cementitious materials and recycled aggregates. IJMER 2:165–171Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tomas U, Jr Ganiron (2015) Recycling concrete debris from construction and demolition waste. IJAST 77:7–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ranjeet Singh
    • 1
    Email author
  • Amit Arora
    • 2
  • Gurmit Singh
    • 3
  • Anand K. Tyagi
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Agriculture EngineeringGovernment Polytechnic SirsaSirsaIndia
  2. 2.Department of Chemical EngineeringShaheed Bhagat Singh State Technical CampusFerozepurIndia
  3. 3.Punjab Pollution Control Board, Regional OfficeFaridkotIndia
  4. 4.Department of Applied Science & HumanitiesShaheed Bhagat Singh State Technical CampusFerozepurIndia

Personalised recommendations