Skip to main content

Ontology-Based Vaccine Adverse Event Representation and Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Healthcare and Big Data Management

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 1028))

Abstract

Vaccine is the one of the greatest inventions of modern medicine that has contributed most to the relief of human misery and the exciting increase in life expectancy. In 1796, an English country physician, Edward Jenner, discovered that inoculating mankind with cowpox can protect them from smallpox (Riedel S, Edward Jenner and the history of smallpox and vaccination. Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) 18(1):21, 2005). Based on the vaccination worldwide, we finally succeeded in the eradication of smallpox in 1977 (Henderson, Vaccine 29:D7–D9, 2011). Other disabling and lethal diseases, like poliomyelitis and measles, are targeted for eradication (Bonanni, Vaccine 17:S120–S125, 1999).

Although vaccine development and administration are tremendously successful and cost-effective practices to human health, no vaccine is 100% safe for everyone because each person reacts to vaccinations differently given different genetic background and health conditions. Although all licensed vaccines are generally safe for the majority of people, vaccinees may still suffer adverse events (AEs) in reaction to various vaccines, some of which can be serious or even fatal (Haber et al., Drug Saf 32(4):309–323, 2009). Hence, the double-edged sword of vaccination remains a concern.

To support integrative AE data collection and analysis, it is critical to adopt an AE normalization strategy. In the past decades, different controlled terminologies, including the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) (Brown EG, Wood L, Wood S, et al., Drug Saf 20(2):109–117, 1999), the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) (NCI, The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Available from: http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/About.html. Access on 7 Oct 2015), and the World Health Organization (WHO) Adverse Reactions Terminology (WHO-ART) (WHO, The WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology – WHO-ART. Available from: https://www.umc-products.com/graphics/28010.pdf), have been developed with a specific aim to standardize AE categorization. However, these controlled terminologies have many drawbacks, such as lack of textual definitions, poorly defined hierarchies, and lack of semantic axioms that provide logical relations among terms. A biomedical ontology is a set of consensus-based and computer and human interpretable terms and relations that represent entities in a specific biomedical domain and how they relate each other. To represent and analyze vaccine adverse events (VAEs), our research group has initiated and led the development of a community-based ontology: the Ontology of Adverse Events (OAE) (He et al., J Biomed Semant 5:29, 2014). The OAE has been found to have advantages to overcome the drawbacks of those controlled terminologies (He et al., Curr Pharmacol Rep :1–16. doi:10.1007/s40495-016-0055-0, 2014). By expanding the OAE and the community-based Vaccine Ontology (VO) (He et al., VO: vaccine ontology. In The 1st International Conference on Biomedical Ontology (ICBO-2009). Nature Precedings, Buffalo. http://precedings.nature.com/documents/3552/version/1; J Biomed Semant 2(Suppl 2):S8; J Biomed Semant 3(1):17, 2009; Ozgur et al., J Biomed Semant 2(2):S8, 2011; Lin Y, He Y, J Biomed Semant 3(1):17, 2012), we have also developed the Ontology of Vaccine Adverse Events (OVAE) to represent known VAEs associated with licensed vaccines (Marcos E, Zhao B, He Y, J Biomed Semant 4:40, 2013).

In this book chapter, we will first introduce the basic information of VAEs, VAE safety surveillance systems, and how to specifically query and analyze VAEs using the US VAE database VAERS (Chen et al., Vaccine 12(10):960–960, 1994). In the second half of the chapter, we will introduce the development and applications of the OAE and OVAE. Throughout this chapter, we will use the influenza vaccine Flublok as the vaccine example to launch the corresponding elaboration (Huber VC, McCullers JA, Curr Opin Mol Ther 10(1):75–85, 2008). Flublok is a recombinant hemagglutinin influenza vaccine indicated for active immunization against disease caused by influenza virus subtypes A and type B. On January 16, 2013, Flublok was approved by the FDA for the prevention of seasonal influenza in people 18 years and older in the USA. Now, more than 3 years later, an exploration of the reported AEs associated with this vaccine is urgently needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Riedel S (2005) Edward Jenner and the history of smallpox and vaccination. Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) 18(1):21

    Google Scholar 

  2. Henderson DA (2011) The eradication of smallpox – an overview of the past, present, and future. Vaccine 29:D7–D9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonanni P (1999) Demographic impact of vaccination: a review. Vaccine 17:S120–S125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Haber P et al (2009) Vaccines and Guillain-Barre syndrome. Drug Saf 32(4):309–323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown EG, Wood L, Wood S (1999) The medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA). Drug Saf 20(2):109–117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. NCI. The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Available from: http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/About.html. Access on 7 Oct 2015

  7. WHO. The WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology – WHO-ART. Available from: https://www.umc-products.com/graphics/28010.pdf

  8. He YQ et al (2014) OAE: the ontology of adverse events. J Biomed Semant 5:29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. He Y (2016) Ontology-based vaccine and drug adverse event representation and theory-guided systematic causal network analysis toward integrative pharmacovigilance research. Curr Pharmacol Rep :1–16. doi:10.1007/s40495-016-0055-0). In press

  10. He Y, et al (2009) VO: vaccine ontology. In The 1st International Conference on Biomedical Ontology (ICBO-2009). Nature Precedings, Buffalo. http://precedings.nature.com/documents/3552/version/1

  11. Ozgur A et al (2011) Mining of vaccine-associated IFN-gamma gene interaction networks using the vaccine ontology. J Biomed Semant 2(2):S8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin Y, He Y (2012) Ontology representation and analysis of vaccine formulation and administration and their effects on vaccine immune responses. J Biomed Semant 3(1):17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Marcos E, Zhao B, He Y (2013) The Ontology of Vaccine Adverse Events (OVAE) and its usage in representing and analyzing adverse events associated with US-licensed human vaccines. J Biomed Semant 4:40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen RT et al (1994) The vaccine adverse event reporting system (Vaers) (Vol 12, Pg 542, 1994). Vaccine 12(10):960–960

    Google Scholar 

  15. Huber VC, McCullers JA (2008) FluBlok, a recombinant influenza vaccine. Curr Opin Mol Ther 10(1):75–85

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Varricchio F et al (2004) Understanding vaccine safety information from the vaccine adverse event reporting system. Pediatr Infect Dis J 23(4):287–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sarntivijai S et al (2012) Ontology-based combinatorial comparative analysis of adverse events associated with killed and live influenza vaccines. PLoS One 7(11):e49941

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sarntivijai S et al (2016) Linking MedDRA®-coded clinical phenotypes to biological mechanisms by the ontology of adverse events: a pilot study on tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Drug Saf:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  19. Evans SJW, Waller PC, Davis S (2001) Use of proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) for signal generation from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 10(6):483–486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Banks D et al (2005) Comparing data mining methods on the VAERS database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 14(9):601–609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Woo EJ et al (2008) Effects of stratification on data mining in the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). Drug Saf 31(8):667–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pearson K (1900) X. on the criterion that a given system of deviations from the probable in the case of a correlated system of variables is such that it can be reasonably supposed to have arisen from random sampling. Lond, Edinb Dublin Philos Mag J Sci 50(302):157–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fisher RA (1922) On the interpretation of χ 2 from contingency tables, and the calculation of P. J R Stat Soc 85(1):87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yates F (1934) Contingency tables involving small numbers and the χ2 test. Suppl J R Stat Soc 1:217–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xie J et al (2016) Differential adverse event profiles associated with BCG as a preventive tuberculosis vaccine or therapeutic bladder cancer vaccine identified by comparative ontology-based VAERS and literature meta-analysis. PLoS One 11(10):e0164792

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Xie J et al (2016) Statistical and ontological analysis of adverse events associated with monovalent and combination vaccines against hepatitis A and B diseases. Sci Rep 6

    Google Scholar 

  27. Brown EG (2003) Methods and pitfalls in searching drug safety databases utilising the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). Drug Saf 26(3):145–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Xiang Z, et al (2011) Ontobee: a linked data server and browser for ontology terms. In the 2nd International Conference on Biomedical Ontologies (ICBO). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, New York

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cox MM et al (2015) Safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of Flublok in the prevention of seasonal influenza in adults. Ther Adv Vaccines 3(4):97–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Poland GA et al (2007) Heterogeneity in vaccine immune response: the role of immunogenetics and the emerging field of vaccinomics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 82(6):653–664

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Poland GA, Ovsyannikova IG, Jacobson RM (2009) Application of pharmacogenomics to vaccines. Pharmacogenomics 10(5):837–852

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. He Y (2014) Ontology-supported research on vaccine efficacy, safety and integrative biological networks. Expert Rev Vaccines 13(7):825–841

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Xiang Z et al (2010) OntoFox: web-based support for ontology reuse. BMC Res Notes 3(1):175

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We appreciate Mr. Jordan Rinder’s editorial review and comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongqun He .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Xie, J., He, Y. (2017). Ontology-Based Vaccine Adverse Event Representation and Analysis. In: Shen, B. (eds) Healthcare and Big Data Management. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1028. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6041-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics