CrossBoss and Stingray System

  • Maoto Habara
  • Seung-Whan LeeEmail author
  • Etsuo Tsuchikane


Over the last decade, interventional cardiologists have globally made tremendous progress in understanding and overcoming conditions associated with chronically occluded coronary arteries. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusions (CTO) is a rapidly evolving field. The initial success rate is increasing with the improvements in technology and technique such as the retrograde approach [1]. Recently, antegrade dissection and reentry (ADR) for CTO PCI has also evolved to one of the techniques, especially in USA and Europe [2]. Although there are several ADR techniques including subintimal tracking and reentry (STAR) or the limited antegrade subintimal tracking (LAST) technique, recent ADR can be achieved with the CrossBoss catheter (Boston Scientific, Nattick, Massachusetts) and the Stingray system (Boston Scientific) [3]. In this section, we describe about the CrossBoss and Stingray system designed for CTO crossing and reentry.


  1. 1.
    Rathore S, Matsuo H, Terashima M, Kinoshita Y, Kimura M, Tsuchikane E, Nasu K, Ehara M, Asakura Y, Katoh O, Suzuki T. Procedural and in-hospital outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions of coronary arteries 2002 to 2008: impact of novel guidewire techniques. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2:489–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Michael TT, Papayannis AC, Banerjee S, Brilakis ES. Subintimal dissection/reentry strategies in coronary chronic total occlusion interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:729–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Whitlow PL, Burke MN, Lombardi WL, Wyman RM, Moses JW, Brilakis ES, Heuser RR, Rihal CS, Lansky AJ, Thompson CA, FAST-CTOs Trial Investigators. Use of a novel crossing and re-entry system in coronary chronic total occlusions that have failed standard crossing techniques: results of the FAST-CTOs (Facilitated Antegrade Steering Technique in Chronic Total Occlusions) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:393–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brilakis ES, Banerjee S, Karmpaliotis D, Lombardi WL, Tsai TT, Shunk KA, Kennedy KF, Spertus JA, Holmes DR Jr, Grantham JA. Procedural outcomes of chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the NCDR (National Cardiovascular Data Registry). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:245–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brilakis ES, Grantham JA, Rinfret S, Wyman RM, Burke MN, Karmpaliotis D, Lembo N, Pershad A, Kandzari DE, Buller CE, DeMartini T, Lombardi WL, Thompson CA. A percutaneous treatment algorithm for crossing coronary chronic total occlusions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:367–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rangan BV, Kotsia A, Christopoulos G, Spratt J, Rinfret S, Banerjee S, Brilakis ES. The hybrid approach for intervention of chronic total occlusions. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2015;11(4):299–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maeremans J, Walsh S, Knaapen P, Spratt JC, Avran A, Hanratty CG, Faurie B, Agostoni P, Bressollette E, Kayaert P, Bagnall AJ, Egred M, Smith D, Chase A, McEntegart MB, Smith WH, Harcombe A, Kelly P, Irving J, Smith EJ, Strange JW, Dens J. The hybrid algorithm for treating chronic total occlusions in Europe: The RECHARGE Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1958–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maeremans J, Dens J, Spratt JC, Bagnall AJ, Stuijfzand W, Nap A, Agostoni P, Wilson W, Hanratty CG, Wilson S, Faurie B, Avran A, Bressollette E, Egred M, Knaapen P, Walsh S, Investigators RECHARGE. Antegrade dissection and reentry as part of the hybrid chronic total occlusion revascularization strategy: a subanalysis of the RECHARGE Registry (Registry of CrossBoss and hybrid procedures in France, the Netherlands, Belgium and United Kingdom). Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(6)
  9. 9.
    Lee PH, Lee SW, Park HS, Kang SH, Bae BJ, Chang M, Roh JH, Yoon SH, Ahn JM, Park DW, Kang SJ, Kim YH, Lee CW, Park SW, Park SJ. Successful recanalization of native coronary chronic total occlusion is not associated with improved long-term survival. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:530–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Habara M, Tsuchikane E, Muramatsu T, Kashima Y, Okamura A, Mutoh M, Yamane M, Oida A, Oikawa Y, Hasegawa K, Retrograde Summit Investigators. Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion outcome according to operator experience from the Japanese retrograde summit registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;87:1027–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Suzuki Y, Tsuchikane E, Katoh O, et al. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions for chronic total occlusion performed by highly experienced Japanese specialists: the first report from the Japanese CTO-PCI Expert Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(21):2144–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee SW, Lee PH, Kang SH, Choi H, Chang M, Roh JH, Yoon SH, Ahn JM, Park DW, Kang SJ, Kim YH, Lee CW, Park SW, Park SJ. Determinants and prognostic significance of periprocedural myocardial injury in patients with successful percutaneous chronic total occlusion interventions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:2220–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harding SA, Wu EB, Lo S, et al. A new algorithm for crossing chronic total occlusions from the Asia Pacific Chronic Total Occlusion Club. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(21):2135–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wilson WM, Walsh S, Hanratty C, et al. A novel approach to the management of occlusive in-stent restenosis (ISR). EuroIntervention. 2014;9:1285–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maoto Habara
    • 1
  • Seung-Whan Lee
    • 2
    Email author
  • Etsuo Tsuchikane
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of CardiologyToyohashi Heart CenterToyohashiJapan
  2. 2.Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical CenterUniversity of Ulsan College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations