Structural Repair and Strengthening of RC Elements with Concrete Jacketing

  • H. Rodrigues
  • P. M. Pradhan
  • A. Furtado
  • P. Rocha
  • N. Vila-Pouca
Chapter
Part of the Building Pathology and Rehabilitation book series (BUILDING, volume 9)

Abstract

Extensive investigations on repair and retrofitting of reinforced concrete elements have been undertaken in recent years and many methods have been developed, tested and reported in the literature. The reinforced concrete jacketing has been considered as one of the important and used methods to correct design errors, deficient concrete production and execution processes, repair damage after earthquake, accidents or in the cases where it is needed to proceed with the change in the functionality of the structure etc. In this chapter is performed a brief review of the literature concerning the numerical and experimental research performed as well as the detailing recommendation and general criteria and procedures used in the concrete jacketing. In the end it is presented an example of an application of RC jacketing to correct a soft-storey mechanism in an existent RC building and it is presented the recent experience in the use of reinforced concrete jacketing in the Kathmandu University after the 2015 Gorkha Earthquake.

Keywords

RC jacketing Repair procedures Reliability Strengthening 

References

  1. 1.
    Júlio E, Branco F, Silva V. Structural rehabilitation of columns with reinforced concrete jacketing. Prog Struct Mat Eng. 2003;5:29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Martinola G, Meda A, Plizzari G, Rinaldi Z. Strengthening and repair of RC beams with fiber reinforced concrete. Cement Concr Compos. 2010;32:731–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rodriguez M, Park R. Seismic load tests on reinforced contrete columns strengthened by jacketing. ACI Struct J. 1994;91:150–9.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ten Ramírez J. concrete column repair methods. Constr Build Mater. 1996;10:195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Júlio E, Branco F. Reinforced concrete jacketing—interface influence on cyclic loading response. ACI Struct J. 2008; 105(4):1–7. https://www.concrete.org/publications/internationalconcreteabstractsportal.aspx?m=details&ID=19861.
  6. 6.
    Júlio E, Branco F, Silva V. Reinforced concrete jacketing—interface influence on monotonic loading response. ACI Struct J. 2005; 252–57.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Konstantinos G, Vandoros S, Dritsos E. Concrete jacket construction detail effectiveness when strengthening RC columns. Constr Build Mater. 2008;22:264–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krainskyi P, Blikharskiy Z, Khmil R. Experimental investigation of reinforced concrete columns strengthened by jacketing. J Multidiscip Eng Sci Technol (JMEST). 2015; 2:1959–1963.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bindhu K, Mohana N, Sivakumar S. New reinforcement detailing for concrete jacketing of nonductile exterior beam column joints. J Perform Constr Facil. 2014; 30(1) (February 2016). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000700.
  10. 10.
    Alcocer S. RC frame connections rehabilitated by jacketing. J Struct Eng. 1993; 119(5) (May 1993). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:5(1413).
  11. 11.
    Cheong H, MacAlevey N. Experimental behavior of jacketed reinforced concrete beams. J Struct Eng. 2000; 126.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tsonos A. Effectiveness of CFRP-jackets and RC-jackets in post-earthquake and pre-earthquake retrofitting of beam-column subassemblages. Eng Struct. 2008;30:777–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ruiz-Pinilla J, Pallarés F, Gimenez P, Calderón P. Experimental tests on retrofitted RC beam-column joints underdesigned to seismic loads. General approach. Eng Struct. 2014;59:702–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Altun F. An experimental study of the jacketed reinforced-concrete beams under bending. Constr Build Mater. 2004;18:611–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tahsiri H, Sedehi O, Khaloo A, Raisi E. Experimental study of RC jacketed and CFRP strengthened RC beams. Constr Build Mater. 2015;95:476–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chalioris C, Pourzitidis C. Rehabilitation of shear-damaged reinforced concrete beams using self-compacting concrete jacketing. International Scholarly Research Network. 2012.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thermou G, Papanikolaou V, Kappos A. Cyclic response of R/C jacketed columns including modelling of the interface behaviour. Presented at the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisboa, 2012.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nishad C, Anto J. Non linear analysis of jacketed reinforced concrete column. Int J Eng Trends Technol (IJETT). 2015; 28:369–373.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Siddappa KYG, Chandra S, Anushree. Finite element analysis of jacketed reinforced concrete columns subjected to axial and uniaxial load. Int J Res Eng Technol. 2015; 4:132–138.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lampropoulos A, Dristsos S. Modeling of RC columns strengthened with RC jackets. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2011;40:1689–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chaulagain H, Rodrigues H, Spacone E, Varum H. Assessment of seismic strengthening solutions for existing low-rise RC buildings in Nepal. Earthq Struct. 2015;8:511–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Furtado A, Rodrigues H, Varum H, Costa A. Evaluation of different strengthening techniques’ efficiency for a soft storey building. Eur J Environ Civ Eng. 2015; 1–18.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    SeismoSoft. SeismoStruc—a computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures; 2004. http://www.seismosoft.com.
  24. 24.
    Varum H. Seismic assessment, strengthening and repair of existing buildings. Aveiro: Departamento de Engenharia Civil, Universidade de Aveiro; 2003.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    EC2. Design of concrete structure, part 1-1: general rules and rules for buildings. European standard EN 1992-1-1. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels; 2004.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Eurocode 8. Design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 1–3: Strengthening and repair of buildings—European prEN 1998-1-3, B. European Committee for Standardization, Belgium; 2003.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rodrigues H, Varum H, Costa A. A non-linear masonry infill macro-model to represent the global behaviour of buildings under cyclic loading. Int J Mech Mater Des. 2008;4:123–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    SEAOC-Vision2000. Performance based seismic engineering of buildings, vols. I and II: Conceptual framework. Ed: Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento (CA); 1995.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    FEMA356. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Ed: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington (DC); 2000.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gobarah A. On drift limits associated with different damage levels. In: Proceedings of the international workshop Bled Slovenia; 2004, pp 321–332.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Magenes G, Pampanin S. Seismic response for gravity-load designed frame systems with masonry infills. Presented at the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (13WCEE), Vancouver, BC, Canada; 2004.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Evaluation of Earthquake Damage Concrete and Masonry Wall Buildings—Basic Procedures Manual Federal Emergency Management Agency; 1999.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Evaluation of Earthquake Damage Concrete and Masonry Wall Buildings—Technical Resources Federal Emergency Management Agency; 1999.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
  35. 35.
    IS 15988. Seismic Evaluation and Strengthening of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings — Guidelines, Bureau of Indain Standards, New Delhi; 2013.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pradhan PM, Adhikari R, Dahal A, Shrestha A, Subedi DL, Thapa S, Kharel P. Retrofitting Design of Kathmandu University Library Building after Gorkha Earthquake 2015. Lowland Technology International (Accepted for Special Issue on “Nepal Earthquake and Disasters”), vol 18, No 2; 2016.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Rodrigues
    • 1
  • P. M. Pradhan
    • 2
  • A. Furtado
    • 3
  • P. Rocha
    • 4
    • 5
  • N. Vila-Pouca
    • 3
  1. 1.RISCO, School of Technology and ManagementPolytechnic Institute of LeiriaLeiriaPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Geomatics Engineering, School of EngineeringKathmandu UniversityDhulikhelNepal
  3. 3.CONSTRUCT-LESE, Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
  4. 4.Department of Civil Engineering, School of Technology and ManagementPolytechnic Institute of Viana do CasteloViana do CasteloPortugal
  5. 5.CONSTRUCT-LESE, Faculty of Engineering (FEUP)University of PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations