Military Airworthiness and Certification Procedures: Global Scenario

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


Military aircraft being state aircraft is not under the purview of ICAO. Therefore, each government self-certifies their military aircraft as per their own standard and compliant to controlled airspace performance requirement. As military aircraft does not satisfy ICAO norms, it may be denied access to national/international airspace. Further, there is no unified procedure across the globe for military aircraft certification and operation. This paper discusses the differences in civil and military certification concepts and the airworthiness and certification processes being followed for military aircraft in some of the advanced countries and India.


Airworthiness Civil Military Certification Flight safety DDPMAS CEMILAC 


  1. 1.
    FAA Order 8130.2H dated 02/04/2015, Airworthiness Certification of Products and Articles—National policyGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gratton G (2015) Initial airworthiness, determining the acceptability of new airborne systems. Springer International Publishing, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Florio F (2006) Airworthiness: an introduction to aircraft certification. Elsevier Publication, UKGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Biswas K et al (2015) Comparison and unification of civil and military aircraft certification procedures. SP-CAD/2015/1000, Dec 2015, CSIR, NAL BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    SAE ARP 4761 Guidelines and methods for conduction safety assessment process on civil airborne systems and equipment. SAE, 1996-12Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mil–Std–882D: Standard practice for system safety assessment. DoD, USA, 10 Feb 2000Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    PS Langford, The principles and practice of airworthiness control. Aeronautical Journal, January 1976Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Airworthiness Manual: International Civil Aviation Organisation. Doc 9760, 3rd Ed 2013Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kundu AJ (2010) Aircraft design. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roskam J (1985) Airplane design, vols I–VII. Roskam Aviation and Engineering Corporation, Ottawa, KansasGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    MAA 01 (2012) Military Authority regulatory policy, military aviation authority. Govt of UK, Issue 2, 23 Feb 2012Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    RA 1500: Certification of UK military registered air system. Regulatory Article, Initial Issue, Military Aviation Authority, Govt of UKGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    DME 5000: Design, modification engineering regulatory articles. Military Aviation Authority, Govt of UKGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Def-Stan–00 970: Design and airworthiness requirement for service aircraft. Military Aviation Authority, Govt of UKGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Air Force Policy Directive 62—6 Developmental Engineering, USAF Airworthiness. DoD, USAF, 11 June 2010Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Air Force Instruction 62—601 Developmental Engineering, USAF Airworthiness. DoD, USAF, 12 May 2011Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mil Std-516B: Airworthiness Certification Criteria. US DoD, 26 Sept 2005Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    FAA order no. 8100.101: Type Certification process for military commercial derivative Aircraft. US Department of Transportation National Policy, 09 July 2007Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Australian Air Publication 7001.048. Defence Aviation Safety Program Manual. Department of Defence, Government of Australia, 04 Sept 2012Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aircraft Industry in Russia—Wikipedia, free encyclopaediaGoogle Scholar
  21. 21. European Defence Agency, Military Airworthiness Recommendations (MAWA). Brussels, January 08, 2013
  22. 22.
    EASA and EDA strengthen civil and military cooperation in Aviation Safety, Press release, Paris 18 June 2013Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nagraj K et al (2005) Reference book on airworthiness and certification of military fixed wing aircraft. CEMILAC, Min of Defence, DRDO, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    DDPMAS—2002: Design, development and production of military aircraft and airborne stores. Department of Defence Production and Supplies, Ministry of Defence, Government of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Raheja DG (2006) Assurance technologies: principles and practices. McGraw-Hill Engineering and Technology Management Series, IncGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CSIR-NALBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Jain UniversityBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations