Skip to main content

Weight Reduction of Structural Members for Ground Vehicles by the Introduction of FRP Composite and Its Implications

Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The dependency of human beings on the automotive industries has risen to large extent and so is the fuel consumption. Vehicular lightweighting is featured in the present paper as an appropriate strategy to address growing concerns about greenhouse gas emissions and fuel consumption by passenger ground vehicles. For every 10% reduction in vehicle weight, the fuel consumption is reduced by about 4–7%. The current demand these days is the vehicles must not only become lighter, but should have power improvements. Vehicular lightweighting can be achieved by substituting some of the iron and steel alloys used in vehicles with other substitutional materials such as aluminum and fiber composites. The composite materials have exceptional properties such as lightweight, high-strength-to-weight ratio, low thermal conductivity, corrosion resistance, considering which the main emphasis has being given to carbon fiber composite materials (FRP) as the prime alternative material for fuel pipes of automobiles. A comparative analysis has been performed among steel 4340, aluminum 6061 alloy, and CFRP fuel pipe. It is observed that the use of aluminum 6061 and CFRP fuel pipe can lead to about 65 and 83% weight reduction of the fuel pipe. The cost associated with the manufacturing and the substitution of alternative materials is also discussed. The cost of substitution with composite materials is, however, the highest, but its implications on fuel saving are extremely beneficial.

Keywords

  • Vehicular lightweighting
  • Fuel consumption
  • CFRP
  • Structural members

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Data source [14]

Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Data source [15]

Fig. 4

Data source [16]

Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Data source [18]

Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

References

  1. Tyagi RK, Sharma SK, Chandra A, Maheshawari S, Goyal P (2015) Improved intake manifold design for I.C. engine emission control. J Eng Sci Technol 10:1188–1202

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thandavamoorthy TS (2009) Analysis of structures. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  3. EPA (2010) Joint technical support document: rulemaking to establish light-duty vehicle greenhouse gas emission standards and corporate average fuel economy standards. US Environmental Protection Agency and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

    Google Scholar 

  4. Knittel CR (2009) Automobiles on steroids: product attribute trade-offs and technological progress in the automobile sector. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. Feychting M, Svensson D, Ahlbom A (1998) Exposure to motor vehicle exhaust and childhood cancer. Scand J Work Environ Health 8–11

    Google Scholar 

  6. Guibet JC, Faure-Birchem E (1999) Fuels and engines: technology, energy, environment, vol 1. Paris: Editions Technip, pp 1–385

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ganesan V (1996) Internal combustion engines (4th edn). McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rudd CD (2001) Composites for automotive applications. iSmithers Rapra Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  9. Xu Z, Huang Y, Song Y, Zhang C, Liu L (2007) Surface characteristics of rare earth treated carbon fibers and interfacial properties of composites. J Rare Earth 25(4):462–468

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Stickel MJ, Nagarajan M (2012) Glass fiber-reinforced composites: from formulation to application. Int J Appl Glass Sci 3(2):122–136

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zafer G, Haftka RT, Hajela P (1999) Design and optimization of laminated composite materials. Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bakaiyan H, Hosseini H, Ameri E (2009) Analysis of multi-layered filament-wound composite pipes under combined internal pressure and thermomechanical loading with thermal variations. Compos Struct 88:532–541

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu W, Jacobs E, Verpoest I (2006) Experimental evaluation of interphase region of carbon fiber composites with plasma polymer polymerized coating. In: ECCM-7 seventh european conference on composite materials, realizing their commercial potential, composites: testing & standardization, vol 2, pp 153–158

    Google Scholar 

  14. EPA (2009) Light-duty automotive technology, carbon dioxide emissions, and fuel economy trends: 1975 through 2009. US Environmental Protection Agency

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ward’s Communications (2006–2008) Model Light vehicle US specifications and prices. Prism Business Media Inc

    Google Scholar 

  16. Volkswagen AG (2009) In: Proceedings on the international conference on innovative developments for lightweight vehicle structures, Wolfsburg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  17. Introduction to composites (1990) Reference handbook (4th edn). Composites Institute, NY

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vasiliev V, Morozov EV (2001) Mechanics and analysis of composite materials (1st edn). Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fritz Larsson, Lars S (2001) Carbon polyethylene and PBO hybrid fiber composites for structural light weight armour. Compos A 33:221–231

    Google Scholar 

  20. Marianna TR (2008) Evaluation of effect of thermal stresses on results obtained from single fiber fragmentation test. Master’s Thesis, Lulea University of Technology, Department of Applied Physics and Mechanical Engineering

    Google Scholar 

  21. Powers WF (2000) Automotive materials in the 21st century. In: Advanced materials and processes. ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio, pp 38–41

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Medhavi Sinha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sinha, M., Tyagi, R.K., Bajpai, P.K. (2018). Weight Reduction of Structural Members for Ground Vehicles by the Introduction of FRP Composite and Its Implications. In: Singh, S., Raj, P., Tambe, S. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Modern Research in Aerospace Engineering. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5849-3_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5849-3_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5848-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5849-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)