Skip to main content

Preliminary Investigations on Localized Rainfall Interception Losses Under Real Field Observations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Hydrologic Modeling

Part of the book series: Water Science and Technology Library ((WSTL,volume 81))

  • 1915 Accesses

Abstract

Even under prevailing advanced science era, hydrological loss functions remain the weakest link and thus governs the ultimate success of any rainfall-runoff modeling on natural catchments. Among various such loss functions, interception happens to be the first and foremost element, on which research efforts are almost negligible, being truer for India and particularly middle Gujarat region. Present study is a preliminary effort, where field-based experimentations were conceived and conducted during rainy season of 2014, by adopting natural trees of different varieties and equipping them with certain low-cost alternative simple gauging setups to record daily magnitudes of stemflows, throughfalls and rainfalls. Two diverse sites were earmarked at newly developed College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology (CAET) Godhra in Gujarat, encompassing about 40 trees of 13 different types/varieties at 2 different sites. Simplified standard protocols and methodological steps were adhered, for measuring the stemflows, throughfalls, and actual rainfalls during active monsoon. Canopy interception (daily) was determined along with stemflow, by equipping the tree barks with reused half-cut tires and flexible plastic pipes and containers beneath it. Appropriately measured tree canopy area and rainfall were utilized in computations. Preliminary results as obtained and communicated herein are indeed an effort to visualize and attempt gap filling for this mistreated hydrological component. The observed range of average values of stemflows and throughfalls was found extremely heterogeneous depending upon rainstorms as well as physiological attributes of trees (8–20 and 5–35%, respectively). Though the individual observed values of intercepted rains remained small, but their cumulative magnitudes had visible hydrological impacts (soil moisture patterns, infiltration patter, overland flows, and re-distribution of raindrops) on land surface located beneath the tree canopy. Results revealed significant influences of vegetative physiognomies on several such impacts from intercepted rainfall, owing to heterogeneous trees and their physiological architecture (canopy area, tree height, types and shape of leaves, bark/branches). The qualitative analysis of intercepted rainwater was also performed and reported herein. Larger trees such as azadirachta indica (neem), mangifera indica (mango), tamarind (emlee), Saraca asoca (ashoka) showed higher interception magnitudes, even for identical rains, showing influence of their high aerodynamic roughness. The observed magnitudes and patterns of rainfall interception from this study are expected to be of vital utilities for futuristic hydrological modeling efforts in study region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmadi MT, Attarod, P, Marvi-Mohadjer MR, Rahmani R, Fathi J (2009) Partitioning rainfall into throughfall, stemflow and interception loss in an oriental beech (fagus orientalis lipsky) forest during the growing season. Turk J Agric 33:557–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfiansyah Y, Rizalihadi MBC, Benara R (2012) Preliminary study on rainfall interception loss and water yield analysis on Arabica coffee plants in central Aceh regency, Indonesia. Aceh Int J Sci and Technol 1(3):94–97. ISSN:2088-9860

    Google Scholar 

  • Asdak C (2010) Hydrology and watershed management. Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta (The fifth print (revision)

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder IR (1986) A stochastic model of rainfall interception. J Hydrol 89:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldier IR (1979) Do trees use more water than grass? Water Serv 83:11–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Casartelli MR, Mirlean N, Peralba MC Barrionuevo S, Gomezrey MX, Madeira M (2008) An assessment of the chemical composition of precipitation and throughfall in rural-industrial gradient in wet subtropics (southern Brazil). Environ Monit Assess 144:105–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9949-y

  • Crockford RH, Richardson DP (2000) Partitioning of rainfall into throughfall, stemflow and interception: effect of forest type, ground cover and climate. Hydrol Process 14:2903–2920

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards KA, Classen GA, Schroten EHJ (1983) The water resource in tropical Africa and its exploitation. ILCA research report No. 6. International Livestock Centre for Africa

    Google Scholar 

  • Fathizadeh1 O, Attarod P, Pypker TG, Darvishsefat1 AA, Zahedi Amiri G (2013) Seasonal variability of rainfall interception and canopy storage capacity measured under individual oak (quercus brantii) trees in Western Iran. J Agri Sci Tech 15:175–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen J, van Beek C, Selker J, Savenije HHG, van de Giesen N (2008) Tree rainfall interception measured by stem compression. Water Resour 44:W00D15. doi:10.1029/2008WR007074

  • Gash JHC (1979) An analytical model of rainfall interception by forests. Quarter J R Meteorol Soc 105:43–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Gash JHC, Wright IR, Llyod CR (1980) Comparative estimates of interception loss from three coniferous forests in Great Britain. J Hydrol 48:89–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gash JHC, Lloyd CR, Lauchaud G (1995) Estimation sparse forest rainfall interception with an analytical model. J Hydrol 170:79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaurav M, Sachin Kumar MD, Kushalappa CG, Vaast P (2012) Throughfall and interception loss in relation to different canopy levels of coffee agroforestry systems. Int J Environ Sci 1(3):145–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Hormann G, Branding A, Clemen T, Herbst M, Hinrichs A, Thamm F (1996) Calculation and simulation of wind controlled canopy interception loss of a beech forest in Northern Germany. Agric Forest Meteorol 79:131–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton RI (1938) Interpretation and application of runoff plot experiments with reference to soil erosion problems. J Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 3:340–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jetten VG (1996) Interception of tropical rain forest performance of a canopy water balance model. Hydrol Process 10:671–685. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199605)10:5

  • Levia DF, Frost EE (2010) A review and evaluation of stemflow literature in the hydrologic and biogeochemical cycles of forested and agricultural ecosystems. J Hydrol 274:1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Okonski B (2007) Hydrological response to land use changes in central European lowland forest catchments. J Environ Eng Landscape Manag 15(1):3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens MK, Lyons RK, Alejandro CL (2005) Rainfall partitioning within semiarid Juniper communities: effects of event size and canopy cover. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Panwar P, Bhatt VK, Pal S, Prasad R (2012) Rainfall interception and runoff in Terminalia, Chebula and Embilica Officinalis based system in sandy-loam soils of lower Himalayas. Central Soil and Water Conservation Research and Training Institute Research Center, Chandigarh-160019, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GG (1983) Throughfall and stemflow in forest nutrient cycle. Adv Ecol Res 13:55–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60108-7

  • Rao AS (1987) Interception losses of rainfall from cashew trees. J Hydrol 90:293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao BK, Kurothe RS, Pande VC, Kumar G (2012) Throughfall and stemflow measurement in bamboo (Dendrocalmus strictus) plantation Indian. J Soil Conserv 40(1):60–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter AJ, Kershaw KA, Robins PC, Morton AJ (1971) A predictive model of rainfall interception in forests. I. Derivation of the model and comparison with observations in a plantation of Corsican pine. Agric Meteorol 9:367–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telkehaimanot Z, Jarvis PG, Ledger DC (1991) Rainfall interception and boundary layer conductance in relation to tree spacing. J Hydrol 123:261–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang A, Diao Y, Pei T, Jin C, Zhu J (2007) A semi-theoretical model of canopy rainfall interception for a broad-leaved tree. Hydrol Process 21(18):2458–2463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wani MA, Manhas RK (2012) Rainfall interception in relation to the tree architecture of Pinus wallichiana. Curr Sci 103(7):821–827

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida H, Hashino, M, Kajita H (1996) A simple method for estimating rainfall interception loss by linear regression model. Ann Proc J Jpn Soc Hydrol Water Resour, 112–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Li XR, Dong XJ, Jia XH, He MZ, Tan, HJ (2009) Rainfall interception by sand-stabilizing shrubs related to crown structure. Sci Cold Arid Reg 1(2):0107–0119

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. L. Gaur .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gaur, M.L., Kumar, S. (2018). Preliminary Investigations on Localized Rainfall Interception Losses Under Real Field Observations. In: Singh, V., Yadav, S., Yadava, R. (eds) Hydrologic Modeling. Water Science and Technology Library, vol 81. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5801-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics