Impact of Higher Order Impairments on QoS Aware Connection Provisioning in 10 Gbps NRZ Optical Networks

  • Karamjit KaurEmail author
  • Hardeep Singh
  • Anil Kumar
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 712)


Invent of the optical amplifier has increased the data traffic being carried by each fiber such that even a brief disruption could result in enormous data loss. As we are moving towards transparent networks, connection provisioning is becoming quite challenging task due to additive nature of physical layer impairments and decreased O-E-O conversions taking place inside the routes. In static connection provisioning, the cost function representing the signal quality must consider not only the linear impairments but also, the effect of higher order impairments as they significantly influence the quality of transmission. Present work describes the design of a system with capability to consider the effect of higher order impairments on OSNR (optical signal to noise ratio) and BER (bit error rate) for connection provisioning in optical networks with the focus on comprehensiveness, transparency, and scalability of the system. The processing is carried out in time domain by offline digital signal processing using eye diagram analysis.


Lightpath Connection provisioning Propagation constant Eye diagram 


  1. 1.
    Saradhi, C.V., Subramaniam, S.: physical layer impairment aware routing (PLIAR) in WDM optical networks: issues and challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 11(4), 109–130 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Azodolmolky, S., Klinkowski, M., et al.: A survey on physical layer impairments aware routing and wavelength assignment algorithms in optical networks. Comput. Netw. 53, 926–944 (2009)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Georgakilas, K.N., Katrinis, K., et al.: Performance evaluation of impairment-aware routing under single- and double-link failures. IEEE J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 2(8), 633–641 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Martnez, R., et al.: Challenges and requirements for introducing impairment-awareness into the management and control planes of ASON/GMPLS WDM networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 44(12), 76–85 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berthold, J., Saleh, A.A.M., et al.: Optical networking: past, present, and future. IEEE J. Lightwave Technol. 26(9), 1104–1118 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Manousakis, K., Christodoulopoulos, K., et al.: Offline impairment-aware routing and wavelength assignment algorithms in translucent WDM optical networks. IEEE J. Lightwave Technol. 27(12), 1866–1877 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ramamurthy, B., Datta, D., et al.: Impact of transmission impairments on the teletraffic performance of wavelength-routed optical networks. J. Lightwave Technol. 17(10), 1713–1723 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rangnekar, A., Sivalingam, K.M.: QoS aware multi-channel scheduling for IEEE 802.15.3 networks. J. Mob. Netw. Appl. 11, 47–62 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mohan, G., Siva Ram Murthy, C., Somani, A.K.: Efficient algorithms for routing dependable connections in WDM optical networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 9(5), 553–566 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zang, H., Jue, J.B., Mukherjee, B.: A review of routing and wavelength assignment approaches for wavelength-routed optical WDM networks. Opt. Netw. Mag. 1(1), 47–60 (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tomkos, I., Sygletos, S., et al.: Impairment constraint based routing in mesh optical networks. In: OSA Conference on Optical Fiber Communication and National Fiber Optic Engineers, March 2007, paper OWR1 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zulkifli, N., Okonkwo, C., Guild, K.: Dispersion optimised impairment constraint based routing and wavelength assignment algorithms for all-optical networks. In: Proceedings of ICTON 2006, paper We.A3.5 (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huang, Y., Heritage, J.P., Mukherjee, B.: Connection provisioning with transmission impairment consideration in optical WDM networks with high-speed channels. J. Lightwave Technol. 23(3), 982–993 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pavani, G.S., Zuliani, L.G., et al.: Distributed approaches for impairment-aware routing and wavelength assignment algorithms in GMPLS networks. Comput. Netw. 52, 1905–1915 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Monoyios, D., Vlachos, K.: Multiobjective genetic algorithms for solving the impairment-aware routing and wavelength assignment problem. IEEE J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 3(1), 40–47 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nelson, L.E., Jopson, R.M.: Introduction to polarized mode dispersion in optical networks. J. Opt. Fiber Commun. Rep. 1(4), 312–344 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kaur, K., Singh, H.: An algorithm of impairment aware routing for wavelength division multiplexed optical networks. Microwave Opt. Technol. Lett. 57(7), 1632–1636 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EIEDThapar UniversityPatialaIndia
  2. 2.ECEDThapar UniversityPatialaIndia
  3. 3.Amity University HaryanaGurgaonIndia

Personalised recommendations