Skip to main content

Addictive Manufacturing, Prosumption and Construction Safety

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
An Economic Analysis on Automated Construction Safety
  • 1826 Accesses

Abstract

Construction safety is one of the most important issues on-sites. In recent years, as the costs of construction accident compensation increased, there has also been a growth in the number of the research studies that shed light on the possible solution to lower the likelihood of accidents. Whilst many of the previous research showed that modular construction reduces the construction accident rates due to higher level of certainty in factory-like environment, we conjecture that the new additive manufacturing (AM) technology may serve a similar purpose. We wish to explore the possibility of using additive manufacturing to reduce construction accidents on-sites. We first provide a brief introduction about additive manufacturing. After that, we provide a detailed description about the working principle of additive manufacturing. Third, we study various different factors that affect the quality of additive manufacturing. Fourth, the pros and cons of additive manufacturing in the construction industry will be explained. Additionally, the application of additive manufacturing in the construction industries will be illustrated. Last, but not least, some case studies will be included to illustrate the application of additive manufacturing in the construction industry to ensure safety on-sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Autodesk. Autocad Lt 2017 [cited 24 April 2017]. Available from http://www.autodesk.com/store.

  • Bassoli, E., A. Gatto, L. Iuliano, and M. Grazia Violante. 2007. 3D printing technique applied to rapid casting. Rapid Prototyping Journal 13 (3): 148–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, Barry. 2012. 3-D printing: The new industrial revolution. Business Horizons 55: 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogers, Marcel, Ian P. McCarthy, and Leyland Pitt. 2015. Leveraging users as innovators: Managing the creative potential of individual consumers. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 37: 3–5. doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2015.09.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buswell, R.A., R.C. Soar, A.G.F. Gibb, and A. Thorpe. 2007. Freeform construction: Mega-scale rapid manufacturing for construction. Automation In Construction 16 (2): 224–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Thomas, Christopher Williams, Olga Ivanova, and Banning Garrett. 2011. Could 3D printing change the world?. Atlantic Council Strategic Foresight Report: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cesaretti, G., E. Dini, X. De Kestelier, V. Colla, and L. Pambaguian. 2014. Building components for an outpost on the Lunar soil by means of a novel 3D printing technology. Acta Astronautica 93: 430–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Q. Gao, X. Wang, and X. Li. 2016. Experimental design and parameter optimization for laser three-dimensional (3-D) printing. Lasers In Engineering (Old City Publishing) 33 (1–3): 189–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, Kaylie. 2015. 3D printing a functional steel bridge. Engineering Answers: 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enshassi, Adnan, and Sobhi Shakalaih. 2015. Construction workers fall accidents from Scaffolding in Gaza Strip. The 6th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management (ICCEPM 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Google. Google Trend 2016 [cited 2 August 2016. Available from https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=3D%20printing.

  • Griffey, Jason. 2014. The types of 3-D printing. Library Technology Reports: 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hague, R.J.M., and P.E. Reeves. 2000. Rapid prototyping, tooling and manufacturing. Rapra Review Report 10(9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Henke, K., and S. Treml. 2013. Wood based bulk material in 3D printing processes for applications in construction. 71(1): 139–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • HKSAR Labour Department. 2015. Occupational safety and health statistics bulletin. Issue No. 15. http://www.labour.gov.hk.

  • Hwang, Dooil, and Behrokh Khoshnevis. 2005. An innovative construction process-contour crafting (CC). 22nd International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction ISARC 2005: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, Yuan, Yong He, Fu Guoqiang, Aibing Zhang, and Du Jianke. 2017. A non-retraction path planning approach for extrusion-based additive manufacturing. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 48: 132–144. doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2017.03.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamali, Mohammad, and Kasun Hewage. 2017. Development of performance criteria for sustainability evaluation of modular versus conventional construction methods 142. Journal of Cleaner Production 142 (4): 3592–3606. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoshnevis, Behrokh. 2004. Automated construction by contour crafting—related robotics and information technologies. Automation in Construction 13 (1): 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, An-Sheng. 2010. A study of the application of the Koch curve and Fuzzy theory on the computer aided design of furniture. International Journal of Organizational Innovation 3 (2): 438–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Rita Yi Man, and Sun Wah Poon. 2013a. Construction Safety. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Rita Yi Man, and Sun Wah Poon, eds. 2013b. A literature review on the causes of construction accidents. Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Rita Yi Man, and Sun Wah Poon. 2011. Using Web 2.0 to share the knowledge of construction safety as a public good in nature among researchers: The fable of economic animals. Economic Affair 31(1): 73–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, Sungwoo, R.A. Buswell, T.T. Le, S.A. Austin, A.G.F. Gibb, and T. Thorpe. 2012. Developments in construction-scale additive manufacturing processes. Automation In Construction 21: 262–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manocher, Djassemi. 2012. A computer-aided approach to material selection and environmental auditing. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 23 (6): 704–716. doi:10.1108/17410381211253290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchand, Alex. 2014. Accessible 3-D printing. Model Railroader 81 (11): 63–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsunaga, Y.T., Y. Morimoto, and S. Takeuchi. 2011. Molding cell beads for rapid construction of macroscopic 3D tissue architecture. Advanced materials 23 (12): H90–H94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, K. Lalit, K. Mallikarjuna Rao, and M.M.M. Sarcar. 2008. Computer aided design and manufacturing. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India: 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, W., and R. Sidwell. 2011. Demystifying the cost barriers to offsite construction in the UK. Construction Management and Economics 29: 1081–1099

    Google Scholar 

  • Pei, Eujin, Jinsong Shen, and Jennifer Watling. 2015. Direct additive manufacturing of polymers onto textiles: Experimental studies and applications. Rapid Prototyping Journal 21 (5): 556–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, Isaac, and Martin Skitmore. 2015a. Three-dimensional printing in the construction industry: A review. Journal: International Journal of Construction Management 15(1): 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, Isaac, and Martin Skitmore. 2015b. Three-Dimensional printing in the construction industry: A review. International Journal of Construction Management 15(1): 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, A., R. Landers, A. Laib, U. Hübner, R. Schmelzeisen, and R. Mülhaupt. 2004. Biofunctional rapid prototyping for tissue-engineering applications: 3D bioplotting versus 3D printing. Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry 42 (3): 624–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinkercad. 2016. Tinkercad is a simple, online 3D design and 3D printing app for everyone https://www.tinkercad.com/.

  • Tuteski, Ognen, Atanas Kočov, and Taško Rizov. 2015. New product design development based on additive manufacturing & rapid prototyping methodology. Journal For Technology of Plasticity 40 (2): 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, David, and Peter Nawara. 2015. Determining the applicability of 3D concrete construction (Contour Crafting) of low income houses in select countries. Cornell Real Estate Review 13: 94–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, Rupert, Bernhard Steyrer, Josef Woess, Tim Koddenberg, and Norbert Mundigler. 2015. 3D printing and wood. Pro Ligno 11 (4): 144–149.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Tang, B’s contribution in this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rita Yi Man Li .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Li, R.Y.M. (2018). Addictive Manufacturing, Prosumption and Construction Safety. In: An Economic Analysis on Automated Construction Safety. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5771-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5771-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5770-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5771-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics