Abstract
Employing robots on building sites may have been considered an unattainable fantasy in the past or simply a futuristic dream. Many construction practitioners are fiercely opposed to the use of robots and are wary of losing their jobs when such creations are intelligent enough to replace human resources. In contrast, the prohibitively high costs of manufacturing, producing and using robots on-site, in comparison to the costs of hiring labourers, is a major concern thwarting the ideas of many construction practitioners who wish to try something new and innovatory. Hence, hiring a robot to work on-site is not an imminent threat to the workers. Nevertheless, the recent technological breakthrough has caused waves in the industry and excited interest. It is reasonable to foresee that robots will usher in a new era in the construction industry. In this chapter, we adopt the data and method triangulation approach to study the construction practitioners’, academics’ and tool providers’ viewpoints with regard to the costs and benefits of robots on construction safety and the construction industry. The interview results show that academics and construction practitioners in different parts of the world worry that robots may take jobs away from manual labourers. Wearable robotics have recently been introduced to one of the companies in Hong Kong’s construction industry, yet most workers and even safety officers have no knowledge of this advance. A focus group interview has been conducted with a PowerPoint presentation and some research participants have worn the wearable robotics and commented on the tools’ usefulness and efficacy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acemoglu, D., and P. Restrepo. 2017. Robots and jobs: Evidence from us labor markets. NBER Working Paper No 23285:1–91.
Bloss, R. 2014. Robots have come to architecture to model, construct, fabricate and offer new approaches to create innovative designs, elements and structures. Industrial Robot: An International Journal 41: 403–407.
Candelas, F.A., G.J. García, S. Puente, J. Pomares, C.A. Jara, J. Pérez, et al. 2015. Experiences on using arduino for laboratory experiments of automatic control and robotics. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48: 105–110.
Google. 2017. Google trend. Available: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?q=robot,robotic%20arm,wearable%20robotics. Accessed April 30, 2017.
Haidegger, T., M. Barreto, P. Gonçalves, M.K. Habib, S.K.V. Ragavan, H. Li, et al. 2013. Applied ontologies and standards for service robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 61: 1215–1223.
Jung, K., B. Chu, and D. Hong. 2013. Robot-based construction automation: An application to steel beam assembly (part ii). Automation in Construction 32: 62–79.
Kahane, B., and Y. Rosenfeld. 2004. Real-time “sense-and-act” operation for construction robots. Automation in Construction 13: 751–764.
Li, R.Y.M. 2015. Generation x and y’s demand for homeownership in hong kong. Pacific Rim Real Estate Journal 21: 15–36.
Li, R.Y.M., H.C.Y. Li, C.K. Mak, T. Tang, and Beiqi. 2016. Sustainable smart home and home automation: Big data analytics approach. International Journal of Smart Home 10: 177–187.
Li, R.Y.M., and P.L. Ng. 2017. Wearable robotics and construction workers safety and health. In: 8th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics Los Angeles.
Li, R.Y.M. 2017. Forthcoming. Smart construction safety in road repairing works. Procedia Computer Science 103.
Mitka, E., A. Gasteratos, N. Kyriakoulis, and S.G. Mouroutsos. 2012. Safety certification requirements for domestic robots. Safety Science 50: 1888–1897.
PN Safety Indutries. 2017. Pn safety indutries. Available: http://www.pnsafetyind.com/. Accessed April 2, 2017.
van Osch, M., D. Bera, K. van Hee, Y. Koks, and H. Zeegers. 2014. Tele-operated service robots: Rose. Automation in Construction 39: 152–160.
Yu, C.T. 2016. The construction institute association mentioned that the abovementioned items are daily wage of the workers. Available: http://www.hk01.com/sns/article/48907?utm_content=buffer99389&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=facebook%20hk01&utm_campaign=buffer. Accessed October 18, 2016.
Yu, S.-N., B.-G. Ryu, S.-J. Lim, C.-J. Kim, M.-K. Kang, and C.-S. Han. 2009. Feasibility verification of brick-laying robot using manipulation trajectory and the laying pattern optimization. Automation in Construction 18: 644–655.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Miss H. Siu, Mr. H. Li, F. Zeng, D. Ng and D.K.F. Ng’s contributions to this book chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Li, R.Y.M. (2018). Robots for the Construction Industry. In: An Economic Analysis on Automated Construction Safety. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5771-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5771-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5770-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5771-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)