Ontology-Based Narratives of the Girija Kalyana

Chapter

Abstract

The important aspect of intangible heritage are the classical stories and folklores which have been passed down over the ages through classical texts, scriptures and word of mouth. The story of Girija Kalyana, which describes various events linked to the marriage of Indian goddess Parvati to God Shiva, is one of such stories from the intangible heritage of India. Every such story has numerous manifestations in tangible heritage artefacts such as statues depicting story characters; mural paintings depicting events in the story; monuments and locations related to aspects of the storyline. Similar depictions of the story are found in intangibles like dance performances, theatre, folk-art and living traditions. In this chapter, we discuss a new paradigm in digital heritage preservation which engages semantic web techniques to offer an immersive and experiential exploration of a heritage theme. A story can have different narratives, each of which, offers a different perspective with reflections in mythology, art and architecture, literature, rituals and crafts, and social and geographical linkages. These narratives can be presented to users with the help of a reasoning framework, based on a domain ontology which provides the means to encode the rich, scholarly knowledge existing with cultural heritage experts. The ontology also enables semantic linkages between digital artefacts in various media formats through curated, semantic annotation. Multimedia Web Ontology Language (MOWL) representation of the heritage ontology permits perceptual modelling of domain concepts in terms of their observable media properties. The language has media propagation rules which allow specification of a semantic concept to be extended to its related concepts in the ontology, and thus helps to widen the scope of concept recognition in media. The ontology-based framework provides a digital infrastructure for a virtual user interface offering an intellectual exploration of the heritage theme in space and time with ontology-guided navigation.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the help extended to us in this work, by renowned cultural anthropologist Dr. Uma V. Chandru of the Indian Institute for Art, Culture and Democracy (IIACD), Bengaluru and by Hampi folklore scholar Dr. Chaluvaraju, Associate Professor at the Department of Tribal Studies, Kannada University, Hampi. They contributed greatly by helping us compile and fine-tune the domain ontology of the Girija Kalyana theme, and also contributed most of the cultural content for the research prototype demo of the same. Visual content for the demo was also provided by National Institute of Design (NID), Bangalore, and IDH team from National Institute for Advanced Studies (NIAS), Bengaluru.

References

  1. 1.
    Aliaga DG, Bertino E, Valtolina S (2011) Decho—a framework for the digital exploration of cultural heritage objects. J Comput Cult Herit 3:12:1–12:26. https://doi.org/10.1145/1921614.1921619
  2. 2.
    Belmonte NG Javascript infovis toolkit. http://philogb.github.io/jit/index.html
  3. 3.
    Ghosh H, Chaudhury S, Mallik A (2013) Ontology for multimedia applications. IEEE Intell Inf Bull 14(1):21–30Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ikeuchi K, Oishi T, Kagesawa M, Banno A, Kawakami R, Kakuta T, Okamoto Y, Lu BV (2010) Outdoor gallery and its photometric issues. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGGRAPH conference on virtual-reality continuum and its applications in industry, VRCAI ’10, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 361–364. https://doi.org/10.1145/1900179.1900254
  5. 5.
    Louvre: Museum website. http://www.louvre.fr/en/homepage
  6. 6.
    Mallik A, Chaudhury S, Dinesh TB, Chaluvaraju: An intellectual journey in history: preserving Indian cultural heritage ICIAP 2013 international workshops, Naples, Italy. LNCS Proceedings, 9–13 Sept 2013. Springer, New York, Inc, pp 298–307Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mallik A, Chaudhury S, Ghosh H (2011) Nrityakosha: preserving the intangible heritage of Indian classical dance. JOCCH 4(3):11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Petridis P, Pletinckx D, Mania K, White M (2006) The EPOCH multimodal interface for interacting with digital heritage artefacts. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference interactive technologies and sociotechnical systems, VSMM 2006, Xi’an, China, 18–20 Oct 2006, pp 408–417 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Recommendation, Owl 2 web ontology language primer. https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-primer/
  10. 10.
    Salembier P, Sikora B, Manjunath BS (2002) Introduction to MPEG-7: multimedia content description interface. Wiley Inc., New York, NY, USA. ISBN 0471486787Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Verghese A, Dallapiccola AL (eds) (2011) South India under Vijayanagara: art and archaeology. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Technology DelhiHauz KhasIndia

Personalised recommendations