Heritage represents everything of the past for which we can be proud of today. In this chapter, we introduce the readers to the different categories of heritage as defined by UNESCO. The chapter then discusses the various techniques being developed and different research efforts going on in the world to digitally preserve cultural heritage—both its tangible and intangible aspects. The UNESCO World Heritage Site of Hampi in South India, with its historical and mythological significance, deserves preservation in physical and digital space. This book is an outcome of the India Digital Heritage project supported by the Department of Science and Technology of the government of India, focussing on the digital preservation of the heritage of Hampi. It attempts to show how multidisciplinary engagement across technology and humanities can provide significant impetus to the cause of documentation, showcasing and interpretation of cultural heritage and in some situations productive explorations of historical debates using digital tools.


  1. 1.
    UNESCO (2003) Convention for the safeguarding of intangible cultural heritage. In: 32nd session of the general conference Paris, 29 September–17 October 2003Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ikeuchi K, Oishi T, Takamatsu J, Sagawa R, Nakazawa A, Kurazume R, Nishino K, Kamakura M, Okamoto Y (2007) The great buddha project: digitally archiving, restoring, and analyzing cultural heritage objects. J Comput Vis 75(1):189–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gomes L, Bellon ORP, Silva L (2014) 3D reconstruction methods for digital preservation of cultural heritage: a survey. Pattern Recognit Lett 50:3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Levoy M, Pulli K, Curless B, Rusinkiewicz S, Koller D, Pereira L, Ginzton M, Anderson S, Davis J, Ginsberg J, Shade J, Fulk D (2000) The digital Michelangelo project: 3D scanning of large statues. In: Proceedings of the conference on computer graphics and interactive, techniques, pp 131–144Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fontana R, Greco M, Materazzi M, Pampaloni E, Pezzati L, Rocchini C, Scopigno R (2002) Three-dimensional modelling of statues: the minerva of arezzo. J Cult Herit 3(4):325–331Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bernardini F, Rushmeier H, Martin IM, Mittleman J, Taubin G (2002) Building a digital model of Michelangelo’s Florentine Pieta. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 22(1):59–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Allen PK, Troccoli A, Smith B, Stamos I, Murray S (2003) The Beauvais cathedral project, vol 1Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grün A, Remondino F, Zhang L, für Geodäsie I, Photogrammetrie (Zürich) (2002) Reconstruction of the Great Buddha of Bamiyan, Afghanistan, ETH, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Institute of Geodesy and PhotogrammetryGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rushmeier H (2006) Eternal Egypt: experiences and research directions. In: International workshop on recording, modeling and visualization of cultural heritage, pp 22–27Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sonnemann T, Sauerbier M, Remondino F, Schrotter G, Campana S, Forte M (2006) Reality based 3d modeling of the angkorian temples using aerial images. British Archaeol Rep Int Ser 1568:573–579Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lu M, Kamakura M, Zheng B, Takamatsu J, Nishino K, Ikeuchi K (2011) Clustering Bayon face towers using restored 3D shape models. Culture Comput 39–44Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koller D, Frischer B, Humphreys G (2009) Research challenges for digital archives of 3D cultural heritage models. ACM J Comput Cult Herit 2, 3, Article 7 (December 2009), 17 ppGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thompson S (1955) Motif-index of folk literature Central trykkeriet, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Laban R (1966) Choreutics. MacDonald and Evans, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kahol K, Tripathi P, Panchanathan S (2004) Automated gesture segmentation from dance sequence. In: 6th IEEE international conference: automatic face and gesture recognition, Seoul, Korea, pp 883–888, 17–19 May 2004Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Camurri A, Hashimoto S, Suzuki K, Trocca R (1999) KANSEI analysis of dance performance. IEEE system, man and cybernetics, Tokyo, Japan, 12–15 October 1999Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhao L, Badler N (2001) Synthesis and acquisition of laban movement analysis parameters for communicative gestures. PhD thesis, Department of Computer & Information Science, University of PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rett J, Dias J, Ahuactzin J (2010) Bayesian reasoning for laban movement analysis used in human machine interaction. Int J Reasoning-Based Intell Syst 2(1):13–35Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mallik A, Chaudhury S, Ghosh H (2011) Nrityakosha: preserving the intangible heritage of Indian classical dance. JOCCH 4(3):11:1–11:25Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Savage P, Merritt E, Rzeszutek T, Brown S (2012) Cantocore: a new cross-cultural song classification scheme. Anal Approaches World Music 2(1)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chen G-F (2014) Intangible cultural heritage preservation: an exploratory study of digitization of the historical literature of Chinese Kunqu opera librettos. ACM J Comput. Cult Herit 7, 1, Article 4 (March 2014), 16 ppGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IIT DelhiNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.IIACDBengaluruIndia
  3. 3.NIASBengaluruIndia

Personalised recommendations