Skip to main content

Pedagogical Approaches to Teaching and Learning English: Connections with Critical Numeracy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 9911 Accesses

Abstract

Together with literacy, numeracy has been acknowledged as a foundation of formal schooling. Once considered the domain of the mathematics and English classrooms respectively, numeracy and literacy—in all their forms—are increasingly recognised as important social practices pertinent to all subjects (Luke and Freebody in Practically Prim 4(2):5–8, 1999, Steen in J Singap Assoc Math Educators 6(1):10-16, 2001, Unsworth in Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice. Open University Press, Buckingham, 2001, Watson in Math Teach 69(1):34-40, 2009, Goos, Geiger, & Dole in Changing classroom practice through a rich model of numeracy across the curriculum, 2012). In the Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority’s [ACARA] in General Capabilities, (2015b), which lists skills required in order to ‘live and work successfully in the twenty-first century’, literacy and numeracy occupy prominent positions amid the seven general capabilities emphasised across all Key Learning Areas (KLAs). Increasingly, highly developed skills in multiple forms of literacies and numeracies are considered vital for citizens in the knowledge society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We use the word ‘literacy’ in the singular here to reflect the terminology of ACARA policy, however, we employ the plural ‘literacies’ or ‘multiliteracies’ elsewhere in this chapter, as recognition of the multiple semiotic systems at play in communication.

References

  • Andreae, G. (1999). Giraffes can’t dance. London: Orchard Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment, and Reporting Authority. (2015a). Australian curriculum: English. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/English.

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment, and Reporting Authority. (2015b). General capabilities. Retrieved from http://www.acara.edu.au/curriculum/general_capabilities.html.

  • Australian Curriculum Lessons. (2013). Jungle themed mini-unit for Foundation year 1: 2 weeks of lesson plans. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculumlessons.com.au/2013/11/09/jungle-themed-mini-unit-foundation-year-1–2-weeks-lessons/.

  • Booker, G. (2011). Building numeracy: Moving from diagnosis to intervention. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booker, G., Bond, D., Sparrow, L., & Swan, P. (2014). Teaching primary mathematics (5th ed.). Melbourne: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & Hirst, E. (2005). Mathematical literacy: Promoting literate practice in a Year 7 classroom. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 13(3), 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freebody, P., & Luke, A. (1990). Literacies programs: Debates and demands in cultural context. Prospect, 5, 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goos, M., Geiger, V., & Dole, S. (2012). Changing classroom practice through a rich model of numeracy across the curriculum. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Congress of Mathematics Education. International Commission on Mathematical Education (ICME): Chungcheongbuk-Do. Retrieved from https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:278741/UQ278741_fulltext.pdf.

  • Guberman, S. R. (1999). Cultural aspects of young children’s mathematics knowledge. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED438892.

  • Heath, S. (1983). Ways with words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, M., & Hogan, J. (2000). Planning for an emphasis on numeracy in the curriculum. Retrieved from aamt.edu.au/content/download/1251/25266/file/kemp-hog.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, M. J., & Whitin, D. J. (2010). Young children use graphs to build mathematical reasoning. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 38(3), 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • L’Engle, M. (1962). A wrinkle in time. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, A., & Freebody, P. (1999). A map of possible practices: Further notes on the four resources model. Practically Primary, 4(2), 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleter, C. E. (1997). Mathematics, multicultural education, and professional development. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 680–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack, S., Watson, J., Hindley, S., Samson, P., & Devlin, R. (2010). What’s average? The Australian Mathematics Teacher, 66(3), 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen, L. A. (2001). Mathematics and numeracy: Two literacies, one language. The Mathematics educator. Journal of the Singapore Association of Mathematics Educators, 6(1), 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, L. (2001). Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum. Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victorian Department of Education (n.d.). Numeracy teaching within domains. Retrieved from: https://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/teachlearn/student/numeracyteachdomains.pdf.

  • Watson, J. M. (2004). Quantitative literacy in the media: An arena for problem solving. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 69(1), 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. (2009). Critical numeracy in context. Retrieved from: http://www.nlnw.nsw.edu.au/videos08/critical_numeracy/pdf/jane_watson.pdf.

  • Watson. J. (2014). Four resource critical numeracy model. Retrieved from http://www.tas-education.org/numeracy/critical_numeracy/critical_numeracy.htm#The_Four_Resource_Model_for_Critical_Numeracy.

  • Watson, J. & Neal, D. (2012). Preparing students for decision-making in the twenty first century—Statistics and probability in the Australian curriculum: Mathematics. In B. Atweh, M. Goos, R. Jorgensen, & D. Siemon (Eds.). Engaging the Australian curriculum mathematics perspectives from the field. Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia: Online Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitlin, D. J., & Whitlin, P. (2003). Talk counts: Discussing graphs with young children. Teaching Children Mathematics, 10(3), 142–149.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel Burke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burke, R., Sharp, H., Field, C. (2018). Pedagogical Approaches to Teaching and Learning English: Connections with Critical Numeracy. In: Sellars, M. (eds) Numeracy in Authentic Contexts. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5736-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5736-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5734-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5736-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics