Skip to main content

Migration and Development: Rural-to-Urban Temporary Migration to Gujarat

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rural Labour Mobility in Times of Structural Transformation

Abstract

Gujarat is one of the major migrant-receiving states. This chapter is based on a study of migrant workers in two Gujarat cities, namely migrant workers in construction and textiles in Ahmadabad and in the diamond cutting industry in Surat. The catchment of migrant labor varies with the industry. Most of the textile workers in Ahmadabad are from three states, namely Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, and Bihar, whereas most of the diamond cutting workers are from Gujarat. The skill requirements, and along with that the remuneration and conditions, of work vary. Among construction workers with low skills, one-third end up with accident insurance and social security. This study also put forward how distress migration could be turned into healthy mobility of labor and how to use it for forging linkages between migration and development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This paper is based on our large study on “migration and Development: A Study of Rural to Urban Temporary Migration to Gujarat State” sponsored by Sankaran Chair at NIRD, Hyderabad.

  2. 2.

    Earlier studies on migration have also found similar observations (Deshingkar and Start 2003, for example, found that the scheduled tribes had higher migration rates in Andhra Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh. Revealed same observation in their study in Chhattisgarh. Devi, Geetha and Gomathi (2009) have found higher ratio of migration in backward community is because of having limited income opportunity at their origin state.

  3. 3.

    A total of 47% migrant workers are landless and majority of workers in each caste category belong to same land owning class. About 48% of the migrant workers are landless which confirm that about half of total population move towards cities due to the less opportunity in agriculture sector.

  4. 4.

    These are the payment of wages act, the minimum wages act, the workmen’s (employee’s) compensation act, the contract labour act, the maternity benefit act, the interstate migrant workers’ act, the building construction workers’ social security act as well as social security schemes and right based acts and services.

  5. 5.

    The only social security available to some is provident fund: 2% of workers in construction work and 11% of migrant workers in textile get provident fund. Group insurance scheme provides insurance to 28% diamond workers, but this insurance is available to only 5% workers in textile units and less than 1% in construction industry. Any form of health insurance is not accessible to construction workers while it is available to 3–5% to other sector workers.

References

  • The Associated Chambers of Commerce & Industry of India (ASSOCHAM) report. (2013). http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/realty-trends/gujarat-attracts-41-investment-in-real-estate-assocham/articleshow/19912636.cms

  • Baran, P. (1993). On the Political Economy of Backwardness. In C. K. Wilber (Ed.), The Political Economy of Development and Underdevelopment (pp. 82–93). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, T., & Zimmermann, K. F. (1998). Causes of International Migration: A Survey. In C. Gorter, P. Nijkamp, & J. Poot (Eds.), Crossing Borders: Regional and Urban Perspectives on International Migration (pp. 95–127). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breman, J. (1994). Wage Hunters and Gathers: Search for Work in the Urban and Rural Economy of So. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, S., de Hass, H., & Miller, M. J. (2003). The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshingkar, P., & Akter, S. (2009). Migration and Human Development in India (Human Development Research Paper 2009/13). UNDP, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshingkar, P., & Farrington, J. (2009). Circular Migration and Multilocational Livelihood Strategies in Rural India. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshingkar, P., & Start, D. (2003). Seasonal Migration for Livelihood in India: Coping, Accumulation and Exclusion (Working Paper 220). Overseas Devlopment Institute, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devi, A. P., Geetha, K. T., & Gomathi, K. R. (2009). Rural Out- Migration: Two Group Discriminant Analysis. Social Change, 39(1), 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of Gujarat. (2009). https://labour.gujarat.gov.in/

  • Harris, J. R., & Todaro, M. P. (1969). Migration, Unemployment and Development: A Two-Sector Analysis. American Economic Review, 60(1), 126–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirway, I. (2009). Losing the Sparkle: Impact of the Global Crisis on the Diamond Cutting and Polishing Industry in India. New Delhi: United Nations Development Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirway, I., & Shah, N. (2011a). Labor and Employment Under Globalisation: The Case of Gujarat. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(22), 57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirway, I., & Shah, N. (2011b). Labor and Employment in Gujarat. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(44 & 45), 62–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirway, I., Sharma, R., & Batabyal, S. (2014, April). Quick Evaluation of Migration Project of PRAYAS. Centre for Development Alternatives Ahmedabad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, W. A. (1954). Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labor. The Manchester School, 22(2), 139–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. E. (1984). Differential Migration, Networks, Information and Risk (Migration and Development Programme Discussion Paper No. 11). Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This chapter is based on our large study on “Migration and Development: A Study of Rural to Urban Temporary Migration to Gujarat State” sponsored by the Sankaran Chair at the National Institute of Rural Development and Panchayati Raj (NIRD&PR), Hyderabad. The authors are grateful to the NIRD&PR for financial support. The authors thank the respondents for their support during the field work. This chapter is a revised version of the paper presented at the International Conference on Labor and Employment Issues in the Context of Emerging Rural-Urban Continuum: Dimensions, Processes and Policies organized by the NIRD&PR, Hyderabad, under the S. R. Sankaran Chair (Rural Labor), March 12–14, 2015.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hirway, I., Singh, U.B. (2017). Migration and Development: Rural-to-Urban Temporary Migration to Gujarat. In: Reddy, D., Sarap, K. (eds) Rural Labour Mobility in Times of Structural Transformation. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5628-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5628-4_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5627-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5628-4

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics