Abstract
Water treatment technologies inherit the environmental, economic, and societal burdens either from polluted natural sources for potable water, or from domestic sewer water for municipal wastewater treatment plants, or from various industrial processing plants that produce highly contaminated wastewater. Application of various membrane technologies for wastewater has been growing because they enjoy relative advantage over other technologies in terms of sustainability. This advantage mainly emanates from economic benefits, ease of operation and safety. This chapter discusses what sustainability means for wastewater treatment and what specific sustainability advantages membrane processes can demonstrate. Applicable sustainability indicators are identified for various membrane technologies that can tackle a large number of wastewater problems.
Keywords
- Sustainability indicators
- Sustainability assessment
- Membrane technologies
- Wastewater treatment
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The required pressure for brakish water can be as high as 26 bar, and for seawater as high as 80 bar.
- 2.
According to the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change, climate change will affect the hydrological cycles of the earth, making some areas arid, others wetter [10].
- 3.
Software packages such as Simapro (http://simapro.com/business/?gclid=CLPpo834rcgCFdCPHwodTnQPQw), Gabi (http://www.gabi-software.com/america/index/) can be used. These packages provide various environmentally relevant impacts (such as acidification potential, ozone depletion potential, cancer causing potential, etc.) per unit mass of the toxics released. USA EPA has freely available package, TRACI, which also can be used for impact assessment.
- 4.
Such as Aspen Plus (http://www.aspentech.com/products/engineering/aspen-plus/).
References
Nickson R, McArthur J, Burgess W et al (1998) Arsenic poisoning in Bangladesh groundwater. Nature 395:338
Ötleş S, Çağındı Ö (2010) Health importance of arsenic in drinking water and food. Env Geochem Health 32:367–371
Flanagan SV, Johnston RB, Zheng Y (2012) Arsenic in tube well water in Bangladesh: health and economic impacts and implications for arsenic mitigation. Bull World Health Organ 90:839–846
EPA Report (2004) EPA 832-R-04-001: primer for municipal wastewater treatment systems. https://www3.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/primer.pdf
Asano T, Levine AD (1996) Wastewater reclamation, recycling and reuse: past, present, and future. Water Sci Techn 33(10–11):1–14
Sikdar SK, Atimtay A (2011) Security of industrial supply and management. Springer, Heidelberg
The World Bank (2015) http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ER.H2O.FWDM.ZS. Accessed 6 Oct 2015
Kumar S (2013) The looming treat of water scarcity. http://vitalsigns.worldwatch.org. Accessed 17 Mar 2016
AQUASTAT (2014) http://www.fao.org/nr/aquastat. Accessed 17 Mar 2016
Climate Institute (2015), http://www.climate.org/topics/water.html. Accessed 6 Oct 2015
WCED, Our Common Future (1987) Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf. Accessed 6 Oct 2015
Fet A (2003) Eco-efficiency reporting exemplified by case studies. Clean Techn Env Pol 5(5):232–237
Sikdar SK, Sengupta D, Harten P (2012) More on aggregating multiple indicators into a single index for sustainability analyses. Clean Techn Env Pol 14(5):765–773
Mukherjee R, Sengupta D, Sikdar S (2013) Parsimonious use of indicators for evaluating sustainability systems with multivariate statistical analyses. Clean Techn Env Pol 15(4):1–8
Santos SF, Brandi HS (2015) Application of the GUM approach to estimate uncertainties in sustainability systems. Clean Techn Env Pol 18(1). doi:10.1007/s10098-015-1029-3
Brandi HS, Daroda RJ, Olinto AC (2014) The use of the Canberra metrics to aggregate metrics to sustainability. Clean Techn Env Pol 16(5):911–920
Semiat R (2008) Energy demands in desalination processes. Env Sci & Techn 42(22):8193–8201
Wolf PH, Siverns S, Monti S (2005) UF membranes for RO desalination pretreatment. Desal 182:293–300
Pearce GK (2007) The case for UF/MF pretreatment to RO in seawater applications. Desal 203:286–295
Knops F, van Hoof S, Futselaar H et al (2007) Economic evaluation of a new ultrafiltration membrane for pretreatment of seawater reverse osmosis. Desal 203:300–306
Vedavyasan CV (2007) Pretreatment trends-an overview. Desal 203:296–299
Ben-Dov E, Ben-David E, Messalem R, Herzberg M, Kushmaro A (2014) Biofilm formation on RO membranes: the impact of seawater pretreatment. Desal Water Treat 1–8
Wisniewski C (2007) Membrane bioreactor for water reuse. Desalination 203:15–19
Zuthi MFR, Ngo HH, Guo WS (2012) Modelling bioprocesses and membrane fouling in membrane bioreactor (MBR): a review towards finding an integrated model framework. Biores Technol 122:119–129
Choi JH, Fukushi K, Yamamoto K (2007) A submerged nanofiltration membrane bioreactor for domestic wastewater treatment: the performance of cellulose acetate nanofiltration membranes for long-term operation. Sep Purif Techn 52(3):470–477
Leiknes T (2009) Wastewater treatment by membrane bioreactors. In: Drioli E, Giorno L (eds) Membrane operations: innovative separations and transformations. WILEY-VCH, Weinheim, pp 363–395
Figoli A, Hoinkis J, Bundschuh J (2016) Membrane technologies for water treatment. Removal of toxic trace elements with emphasys on arsenic, fluoride and uranium. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, London
Shih MC (2005) An overview of arsenic removal by pressure driven membrane processes. Desalination 172:85–97
Figoli A, Cassano A, Criscuoli A, Mozumder MSI, Uddin MT, Islam MA, Drioli E (2010) Influence of operating parameters on the arsenic removal by nanofiltration. Water Res 44:97–104
Cassano A, Conidi C, Ruby-Figuero R et al (2015) A two-step nanofiltration process for the production of phenolic-rich fractions from artichoke aqueous extracts. Int J Mol Sci 16(4):8968–8987
Russo C (2007) A new membrane process for the selective fractionation and total recovery of polyphenols, water and organic substances from vegetation waters (VW). J Membr Sci 288:239–246
Drioli E, Criscuoli A, Curcio E (2006) Membrane contactors: fundamentals, applications and potentialities. Membrane science and technology series, vol 11. Elsevier, Amsterdam
LiquiCel (2015) http://www.liquicel.com. Accessed 20 Nov 2015
Criscuoli A, Carnevale MC, Mahmoudi H et al (2011) Membrane contactors for the oxygen and pH control in desalination. J Membr Sci 376:207–213
Alkhudhiri A, Darwish N, Hilal N (2012) Membrane distillation: a comprehensive review. Desalination 287:2–18
Khayet M, Matsuura T (2011) Membrane distillation: principles and applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Qu D, Wang J, Hou D et al (2009) Experimental study of arsenic removal by direct contact membrane distillation. J Haz Mater 163:874–879
Pal P, Manna AK (2010) Removal of arsenic from contaminated groundwater by solar-driven membrane distillation using three different commercial membranes. Water Res 44:5750–5760
Criscuoli A, Bafaro P, Drioli E (2013) Vacuum membrane distillation for purifying waters containing arsenic. Desalination 323:17–21
Khan EU, Martin AR (2014) Water purification of arsenic-contaminated drinking water via air gap membrane distillation (AGMD). Period Polytech Mech Eng 58(1):47–53
Méricq J-P, Laborie S, Cabassud C (2010) Vacuum membrane distillation of seawater reverse osmosis Brines. Water Res 44:5260–5273
Drioli E, Di Profio G, Curcio E (2012) Progress in membrane crystallization. Current Opin Membr Eng 1:178–182
Redondo J, Busch M, De Witte J-P (2003) Boron removal from seawater using FILMTECHTM high rejection SWRO membranes. Desalination 156:229–238
Criscuoli A, Rossi E, Cofone F et al (2010) Boron removal by membrane contactors: the water that purifies water. Clean Techn Env Pol 12(1):53–61
Cassano A, Conidi C, Ruby-Figuero R (2014) Recovery of flavonoids from orange press liquor by an integrated membrane process. Membr (Basel) 4(3):509–524
Van der Bruggen B (2013) Integrated membrane separation processes for recycling of valuable wastewater streams: nanofiltration, membrane distillation and membrane crystallizers revisited. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:10335–10341
Criscuoli A, Drioli E (2007) New metrics for evaluating the performance of membrane operations in the logic of process intensification. Ind Eng Chem Res 46:2268–2271
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sikdar, S.K., Criscuoli, A. (2017). Sustainability and How Membrane Technologies in Water Treatment Can Be a Contributor. In: Figoli, A., Criscuoli, A. (eds) Sustainable Membrane Technology for Water and Wastewater Treatment. Green Chemistry and Sustainable Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5623-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5623-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-5621-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-5623-9
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)