Numerical Study on Hydrodynamic Characteristics

  • Siming ZhengEmail author
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)


This chapter presents a dynamic analysis of a two-raft wave-powered desalination device based on the three-dimensional wave radiation-diffraction method. The device consists of two hinged cylindrical rafts of elliptical cross section and a Power Take-Off (PTO) system at the joint, which is used to represent a simplified desalination module of the device.


Elliptical Cross Section Raft Length Coulomb Damping Dimensionless Damping Coefficients Pitch Velocity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Babarit A, Clément AH (2006) Optimal latching control of a wave energy device in regular and irregular waves. Appl Ocean Res 28(2):77–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babarit A, Hals J, Muliawan MJ et al (2012) Numerical benchmarking study of a selection of wave energy converters. Renewable Energy 41:44–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen W, Zhang Y, Zheng S (2014) Advance in the study of wave energy dissipation of floating bodies. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Asian Wave and Tidal Energy ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  4. Cummins WE (1962) The impulse response function and ship motions. Schiffstechnik 9(1661):101–109Google Scholar
  5. Drew B, Plummer AR, Sahinkaya MN (2009) A review of wave energy converter technology. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part A: J Power Energy 223:887–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Falnes J (2002) Ocean waves and oscillating systems: linear interactions including wave-energy extraction, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Greco M, Colicchio G, Faltinsen OM (2009a) Bottom slamming for a very large floating structure: uncoupled global and slamming analyses. J Fluids Struct 25(2):406–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Greco M, Colicchio G, Faltinsen OM (2009b) Bottom slamming for a very large floating structure: coupled global and slamming analyses. J Fluids Struct 25(2):420–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kraemer DRB (2001) The motions of hinged-barge systems in regular seas. Dissertation, Johns Hopkins UniversityGoogle Scholar
  10. Loukogeorgaki E, Michailides C, Angelides DC (2012) Hydroelastic analysis of a flexible mat-shaped floating breakwater under oblique wave action. J Fluids Struct 31:103–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Michailides C, Angelides DC (2012) Modeling of energy extraction and behavior of a flexible floating breakwater. Appl Ocean Res 35:77–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Michailides C, Angelides DC (2015) Optimization of a flexible floating structure for wave energy production and protection effectiveness. Eng Struct 85:249–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Newman JN (1994) Wave effects on deformable bodies. Appl Ocean Res 16(59):47–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nolan G, Catháin MÓ, Murtagh J et al (2003) Modelling and simulation of the power take-off system for a hinge-barge wave-energy converter. In: Proceedings of the 5th European Wave Energy ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  15. Retzler C, Pizer D, Henderson R et al (2003) Pelamis: advances in the numerical and experimental modelling programme. In: Proceedings of the 5th European Wave Energy ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  16. Sheng W, Alcorn R, Lewis A (2014) On improving wave energy conversion, part I: optimal and control technologies. Renew Energy 75:922–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stansby P, Moreno EC, Stallard T (2015a) Capture width of the three-float multi-mode multi-resonance broadband wave energy line absorber M4 from laboratory studies with irregular waves of different spectral shape and directional spread. J Ocean Eng Mar Energy 1(3):287–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stansby P, Moreno EC, Stallard T et al (2015b) Three-float broad-band resonant line absorber with surge for wave energy conversion. Renew Energy 78:132–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sumer BM, Fredsøe J (2006) Hydrodynamics around cylindrical structures. Revised edn. World Scientific, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  20. Sun L, Eatock Taylor R, Choo YS (2011) Responses of interconnected floating bodies. The IES J Part A: Civ Struct Eng 4(3):143–156Google Scholar
  21. Wan Nik WB, Sulaiman OO, Rosliza R et al (2011) Wave energy resource assessment and review of the technologies. Int J Energy Environ 2(6):1101–1112Google Scholar
  22. Wooley M, Platts J (1975) Energy on the crest of a wave. New Sci 66(947):241–243Google Scholar
  23. Yang C (2015) Study on operating characteristics of oscillating-buoy wave energy converter. Dissertation, Tsinghua University (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  24. Zhang YL (2010) Fluid-structure dynamic interaction. Academy Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhang YL, Zheng SM (2014) Development of experimental teaching platform based on utilization of ocean wave energy. Exp Tech Manag 31(9):69–71 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  26. Zheng SM, Zhang YL (2014) Study on the wave power absorption of a raft-typed wave energy collector. J Eng Heilongjiang University, 5(2):7–13, 42 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  27. Zheng SM, Zhang YL, Chen WC (2014) Optimization of the power take-off system in oscillating wave surge converter. In: Zhang YL, Lin BL. Research Progress of Ocean Energy Technology in 2014. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  28. Zheng S, Zhang Y, Sheng W (2015a) Numerical study on the dynamics of a novel two-raft wave energy absorption device. In: Proceedings of the 11th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference, 07C1-3Google Scholar
  29. Zheng SM, Zhang YH, Zhang YL et al (2015b) Numerical study on the dynamics of a two-raft wave energy conversion device. J Fluids Struct 58:271–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations