Advertisement

Analytical Study on Hydrodynamic Characteristics

  • Siming ZhengEmail author
Chapter
  • 179 Downloads
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)

Abstract

In this chapter, an analytical model is developed for the motion response and wave attenuation of a raft-type wave-powered desalination device. The desalination module of the device is simplified as a Power Take-Off (PTO) system. The analytical solution of diffraction and radiation problem of multiple two-dimensional rectangular bodies floating on a layer of water of finite depth is obtained using a linearized potential flow theory. Wave excitation forces, added masses and wave damping coefficients for these bodies are calculated from incident, diffracted and radiated potentials. Upon solving the motion equation, response, power absorption and wave attenuation of a raft-type wave power device are obtained. The model is validated by comparison of the present results with the existing ones, and energy conservation is checked. The validated model is then utilized to examine the effect of PTO damping coefficient, raft draft, spacing between two rafts, water depth, and raft numbers on power absorption and wave transmission coefficient of raft-type wave power device. The influence of structure length ratio is also discussed. It is found that the same wave transmission coefficient can be obtained by any certain raft-type wave power device, regardless of wave propagation direction.

Keywords

Wave Excitation Forces Linear Damping Coefficient Linearized Potential Flow Theory Power Absorption Efficiency Raft Length 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Falnes J (2002) Ocean waves and oscillating systems: linear interactions including wave-energy extraction, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Haren P (1978) Optimal design of Hagen-Cockerell raft. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  3. Koutandos E, Prinos P, Gironella X (2005) Floating breakwater under regular and irregular wave forcing: reflection and transmission characteristics. J Hydraul Res 43(2):174–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lamas-Pardo M, Iglesias G, Carral L (2015) A review of Very Large Floating Structures (VLFS) for coastal and offshore uses. Ocean Eng 109:677–690Google Scholar
  5. Li B, Cheng L, Deeks AJ et al (2005) A modified scaled boundary finite-element method for problems with parallel side-faces. Part II. Application and evaluation. Appl Ocean Res 27(4–5):224–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Liu Y, Li HJ (2014) A new semi-analytical solution for gap resonance between twin rectangular boxes. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part M: J Eng Marit Environ 228(1):3–16Google Scholar
  7. Lu L, Teng B, Sun L et al (2011) Modelling of multi-bodies in close proximity under water waves—fluid forces on floating bodies. Ocean Eng 38(13):1403–1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. McIver P (1986) Wave forces on adjacent floating bridges. Appl Ocean Res 8(2):67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Miao G, Ishida H, Saitoh T (2000) Influence of gaps between multiple floating bodies on wave forces. China Ocean Eng 14(4):407–422Google Scholar
  10. Williams AN, Abul-Azm AG (1997) Dual pontoon floating breakwater. Ocean Eng 24(5):465–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Williams AN, Lee HS, Huang Z (2000) Floating pontoon breakwaters. Ocean Eng 27(3):221–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhang YL (2010) Fluid-structure dynamic interaction. Academy Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  13. Zheng S, Zhang Y (2016) Wave diffraction and radiation by multiple rectangular floats. J Hydraul Res 54(1):102–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Zheng S, Zhang Y (2017) Analytical study on hydrodynamic performance of a raft-type wave power device. J Mar Sci Technol, 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s00773-017-0436-z
  15. Zheng YH, You YG, Shen YM (2004) On the radiation and diffraction of water waves by a rectangular buoy. Ocean Eng 31(8–9):1063–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zheng S, Zhang Y, Sheng W (2015a) Numerical study on the dynamics of a novel two-raft wave energy absorption device. In: Proceedings of the 11th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference, 07C1-3Google Scholar
  17. Zheng SM, Zhang YH, Zhang YL et al (2015b) Numerical study on the dynamics of a two-raft wave energy conversion device. J Fluids Struct 58:271–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations